Pingdu Qianmei Eyelash Factory Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Pingdu Qianmei Eyelash Factory is a China-based eyelash-related product supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 320+㎡ and 10+ staff. The company appears to be a small-scale manufacturer with verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 5 years, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including warranty availability, on-time delivery of 96.4%, response time within 1 hour, and full customization. Its product range in the provided data focuses on DIY lash bond, seal remover, waterproof DIY liquid, private label lash products, strip lash liquid, and strong-hold eyelash glue, with low MOQs suitable for trial orders, small wholesalers, beauty startups, and private-label buyers testing market demand. Business performance is moderate to solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥473.2K+ transaction value in the past six months. However, the factory size, workforce scale, review volume, and lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection data indicate that quality and capacity validation should be further confirmed before large-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory area: 320+㎡
• Employees: 10+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Location: Shandong, China
• Product scope provided: eyelash glue, bond and seal remover, waterproof DIY liquid, private label lash-related products

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical factory presence with a stated production area of over 320㎡ and more than 10 employees. This indicates basic manufacturing capability, but the available scale data suggests a relatively small factory rather than a large or mid-sized industrial supplier. The verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of its operational existence and provides some reassurance that the company has undergone a form of supplier or factory verification.

The product information shows a focused category around eyelash adhesive and related DIY lash products. The low minimum order quantities, such as 2 pieces, 3 units, and 10 pieces, suggest the supplier is commercially positioned to support small-batch buyers, testing orders, and private-label entry-level procurement rather than only large-scale wholesale production.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic production capability and has verification support, which prevents it from being classified as weak or unverifiable. However, the reported factory size of 320+㎡ and 10+ staff indicate limited production scale. There is no provided data on production lines, monthly capacity, equipment, R&D team, laboratory facilities, or large-scale manufacturing infrastructure. Therefore, the supplier fits the category of a small factory with foundational production ability rather than a medium or large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Platform/industry labels: Warranty available, On-time delivery 96.4%, Response time ≤1h, Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has several meaningful platform credibility indicators. A 5-year Gold Supplier history shows a certain level of continuity on the platform. Trade Assurance availability provides buyers with transaction protection, which is important for cross-border procurement risk control. The verified supplier status also supports platform-level credibility.

The certification and platform label set is commercially useful, especially the warranty availability, full customization, fast response, and on-time delivery indicators. However, the provided data does not include third-party product certifications, cosmetic safety certifications, chemical compliance documents, ISO certification, GMP certification, MSDS, or other regulatory documentation that may be relevant for eyelash glue or beauty adhesive products. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, but compliance documentation depth cannot be fully confirmed from the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, 5-year history, Trade Assurance, and verification. These are stronger than basic platform listings and suggest a relatively reliable trading profile. However, the Gold Supplier duration is moderate rather than very long, and the provided certification labels are platform/service-oriented rather than comprehensive product compliance certifications. Because compliance documentation beyond platform verification is not provided, the supplier should not receive a top-tier credibility score.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
• Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥473.2K+
• Store rating: 4.4
• Reviews: 50+

Elaboration

The supplier shows measurable transaction activity, with over 300 orders in the past six months and transaction value exceeding CN¥473.2K. This indicates that the supplier has active buyers and repeat marketplace exposure. The commercial performance is stronger than suppliers with very few visible transactions or limited order history.

The store rating of 4.4 is acceptable but not outstanding. The review count of 50+ provides some customer feedback base, though it is not large enough to be considered highly validated at scale. The transaction amount suggests steady business activity, but not necessarily high-volume enterprise-level purchasing. Overall, the supplier demonstrates moderate marketplace traction and a functioning sales operation.

Scoring Rationale

The 300+ orders and CN¥473.2K+ transaction value over six months indicate stable activity and a reasonable level of buyer acceptance. However, the rating of 4.4 is below the level typically considered excellent, and the 50+ reviews provide only a moderate feedback sample. This combination supports a mid-to-upper score for business performance, but not the highest band reserved for high order volume, high transaction value, high ratings, and large review pools.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Response time: ≤1 hour
• Full customization: Listed as available
• Warranty available: Listed as available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within one hour is a strong service indicator, especially for international procurement where rapid communication can directly affect quotation speed, sample confirmation, packaging approval, and order coordination. The availability of full customization is also relevant for private-label beauty buyers, particularly those seeking customized branding, packaging, or product presentation.

Warranty availability further supports the supplier’s service profile, although the specific warranty terms are not provided. The data does not include details such as English communication capability, sample lead time, design support, packaging customization scope, or after-sales claim handling process. Therefore, service capability appears strong based on response and customization labels, but cannot be fully validated beyond the platform-provided indicators.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤1 hour meets the highest service benchmark in the given scoring framework. Full customization is also explicitly provided, which is valuable for private-label and branded buyers. Because the data does not include deeper service process information, such as sample handling speed or dedicated account management, the score should be high but not treated as fully comprehensive.

Final Score

9 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 96.4%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 96.4% is a strong logistics and fulfillment indicator. It exceeds the 90% benchmark for the highest scoring band. This suggests that the supplier has been able to meet expected dispatch timelines for the majority of orders recorded on the platform.

However, the provided data does not include average lead time, production lead time for customized orders, shipping methods, peak-season performance, or large-order delivery records. Therefore, while the on-time shipment rate is clearly strong, buyers should still confirm delivery timelines for bulk or customized production before placing larger orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 96.4%, the supplier performs well above the threshold. The lack of further lead-time details prevents assigning a perfect score, but the available metric strongly supports a high delivery performance rating.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.4
• Reviews: 50+
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Warranty available: Listed as available
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.4 with more than 50 reviews, indicating that there is a visible customer feedback base. The rating is generally acceptable, though it does not represent an exceptional customer satisfaction level. The review count is useful but still moderate, meaning the quality reputation is not yet supported by a large volume of buyer evaluations.

The verified supplier status and warranty label provide some quality assurance support. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, internal QC processes, third-party inspection records, product safety testing, batch traceability, or compliance documents for lash adhesive products. Since beauty adhesive products may require careful quality and safety control, this missing information is an important procurement risk factor.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has reasonable customer feedback and some platform-based assurance, but the 4.4 rating is not high enough to indicate top-tier quality consistency. The 50+ reviews provide moderate validation but not extensive market proof. Most importantly, Finished Product Inspection information is not provided, and there is no detailed quality management or compliance data. Therefore, the supplier should receive a mid-level score rather than a high quality score.

Final Score

13 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Pingdu Qianmei Eyelash Factory is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ eyelash adhesive and DIY lash-related products, especially small wholesalers, e-commerce sellers, beauty startups, and private-label buyers conducting sample testing or early-stage product validation. The supplier’s strengths include 5 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, fast response within 1 hour, full customization availability, and strong on-time delivery performance of 96.4%.

The main risks are limited production scale, with only 320+㎡ factory area and 10+ staff reported, as well as incomplete quality system data. Finished Product Inspection is Insufficient Data, and no product compliance certificates or detailed QC procedures are provided. The store rating of 4.4 and 50+ reviews indicate acceptable but not outstanding customer validation.

For procurement, it is advisable to start with samples or small trial orders, verify product quality, packaging customization capability, ingredient/compliance documentation, and batch consistency before scaling to larger orders. The supplier has growth potential for private-label and small-batch beauty procurement, but large-volume buyers should conduct additional factory and quality due diligence.