zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Xinji Weiwei Textile Factory Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Xinji Weiwei Textile Factory is a China-based textile supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of 3,000+㎡ and 80+ staff. The supplier focuses on scarf, hijab, satin, chiffon, voile, and digitally printed fabric-related products, with relatively low MOQ options shown across several listed items. From a procurement perspective, the company demonstrates a solid mid-sized manufacturing profile supported by verified supplier status, 12 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection and Warranty Available. Its recent business performance is strong, with 400+ orders and CN¥6.7M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking textile accessories or fabric-related products with moderate customization needs, low MOQ flexibility, and reliable delivery performance. Key limitations are the lack of explicit data on full customization capability and detailed factory certification beyond platform verification.

Xinji Weiwei Textile Factory

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Hebei, China
  • Factory area: 3,000+㎡
  • Employees: 80+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

Xinji Weiwei Textile Factory presents a measurable manufacturing base with a factory area exceeding 3,000㎡ and more than 80 employees. This indicates a supplier with established physical production capacity rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The verified supplier status provides an additional layer of credibility regarding the existence and basic operating capability of the company.

However, the available data does not include detailed production lines, monthly production capacity, equipment list, export volume, or formal factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication. Therefore, while the supplier demonstrates stable mid-scale capability, the data is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale or highly integrated manufacturing group.

Scoring Rationale

The company fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. Its factory area and employee count are meaningful for textile-related production, and verified supplier status strengthens confidence in its operating base. Nevertheless, the absence of deeper factory certification, capacity figures, and production infrastructure details prevents a top-tier score. The supplier is stronger than a small basic workshop but does not reach the level of a large-scale, fully documented supply chain manufacturer.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Platform / industry labels:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 12-year Gold Supplier record indicates long-term platform presence, which is a positive factor for procurement screening. Trade Assurance support provides transactional protection for buyers, while verified supplier status improves basic trustworthiness.

The available compliance-related labels are also useful. “Finished product inspection” is directly relevant to quality control, while “Warranty available” suggests some form of after-sales or product accountability mechanism. “Low MOQ for customization” is commercially valuable for buyers requiring smaller custom runs. However, the data does not provide third-party management system certifications such as ISO, BSCI, OEKO-TEX, GRS, or other industry-specific compliance documents. Therefore, platform credibility is strong, but broader compliance documentation remains insufficient.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a complete and mature -based credibility structure: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verification, and quality-related platform labels. The 12-year Gold Supplier record is particularly positive. The score is close to the top range, but not full marks because no independent factory audit certificate or internationally recognized compliance certification is provided in the supplied data.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 400+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥6.7M+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity. More than 400 orders within six months indicates active buyer engagement and repeated platform transactions. A transaction value above CN¥6.7M over the same period demonstrates meaningful sales scale, especially for textile accessories and fabric-related products that often have relatively low unit prices.

The store rating of 4.7 is positive and suggests generally favorable customer satisfaction. The review count of 100+ provides a reasonable feedback base, though it is not extremely large compared with top-volume platform suppliers. Overall, the business performance data supports the conclusion that the supplier is commercially validated and actively serving buyers.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 400+ orders and CN¥6.7M+ transaction value in six months places the supplier in a strong business performance category. The 4.7 rating is good, and the review base is sufficient to support basic confidence. A slightly lower-than-perfect score is appropriate because the rating is strong but not exceptional, and the review volume, while useful, is not extensive enough to fully eliminate customer feedback risk.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤1 hour
  • Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
  • Explicit Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of less than or equal to one hour is a strong indicator of communication efficiency. For international procurement, fast response time is important for quotation clarification, sample discussion, order follow-up, and issue resolution.

The platform label “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some level of customization flexibility, especially for smaller buyers or test orders. However, the data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability. It also does not provide details on design support, OEM/ODM process, packaging customization, sample lead time, artwork handling, or dedicated account management. Therefore, the service capability appears efficient and buyer-friendly, but the customization depth cannot be fully verified.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a strong service score due to the ≤1h response time and the presence of a customization-related label. However, because full customization capability is not explicitly confirmed, the supplier cannot be scored at the highest level under this dimension. The current data supports good communication capability and basic customization flexibility, but not advanced service capability.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 98.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate of 98.9% is very strong. This indicates a high level of order execution reliability on the platform. For textile and accessory procurement, delivery consistency is important because buyers often operate with seasonal sales cycles, promotional timelines, or inventory replenishment schedules.

A rate close to 99% suggests that the supplier has effective order handling and dispatch management. The data does not include average lead time, peak season performance, logistics methods, or delay dispute records, so the evaluation is limited to the provided on-time dispatch metric.

Scoring Rationale

According to the required scoring standard, a delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 98.9%, the supplier is clearly within the top range. Since the data is highly favorable and directly relevant, a full score is justified for this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 100+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Provided as platform label
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Factory Verification: Interpreted only as verified supplier status based on provided data
  • Additional formal quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s quality and customer feedback profile is generally strong. A 4.7 store rating indicates positive buyer satisfaction, and 100+ reviews provide a meaningful customer feedback base. The “Finished product inspection” label is particularly relevant because it suggests that completed goods are inspected before dispatch, which can reduce the risk of receiving defective or inconsistent products.

Verified supplier status also supports basic supplier credibility. However, the data does not provide detailed quality control procedures, inspection standards, defect rate, return rate, sample approval process, or internationally recognized textile certifications. As a result, the supplier appears to have a solid platform-level quality assurance foundation, but the depth of its quality management system cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a high score due to its good rating, reasonable review volume, verified status, and finished product inspection label. These factors provide practical quality assurance for standard procurement. However, the absence of detailed QC documentation and independent quality certifications prevents a maximum score. The quality profile is strong for platform-based sourcing but still requires further verification for buyers with strict compliance or premium quality requirements.

Final Score

18 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 18 / 20
Total Score 89 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with standard due diligence before bulk purchasing.

Xinji Weiwei Textile Factory is a strong candidate for buyers sourcing scarves, hijabs, satin, chiffon, voile, and digitally printed fabric-related products. The supplier is especially suitable for small to medium-sized buyers, online retailers, fashion accessory brands, and buyers requiring relatively low MOQ options with responsive communication and reliable dispatch performance.

The main strengths are its 12-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 400+ recent orders, CN¥6.7M+ transaction value, 98.9% on-time dispatch rate, and Finished Product Inspection label. These indicators suggest strong platform credibility and commercially proven supply capability.

Key risks include Insufficient Data on full customization capability, detailed production capacity, formal factory audit reports, international compliance certifications, and comprehensive quality control procedures. For larger or compliance-sensitive buyers, it is recommended to request samples, confirm customization scope, verify inspection standards, and review any available factory or product certification documents before placing large-volume orders.

Overall, the supplier shows strong growth potential and is well-positioned for buyers seeking stable textile accessory sourcing with low MOQ flexibility and reliable platform-backed transaction protection.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Xinji Aosen Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinji Aosen Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Y&L Fashion Factory Limited Supplier Evaluation
Y&L Fashion Factory Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hongsheng Hardware Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hongsheng Hardware Factory Supplier Evaluation
Kangfu Medical Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Kangfu Medical Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Guanhua Paper Factory Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Guanhua Paper Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Commodity Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Commodity Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Tyson Lighting Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Tyson Lighting Factory Supplier Evaluation
Pingdu Qianmei Eyelash Factory Supplier Evaluation
Pingdu Qianmei Eyelash Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Sarla Wig Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Sarla Wig Factory Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hengxin Thread Factory Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hengxin Thread Factory Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Haixinwei Electronic Factory Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Haixinwei Electronic Factory Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Membrane Switch Factory Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Membrane Switch Factory Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Trump Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Trump Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Tuomei Machinery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Tuomei Machinery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Sanyang Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sanyang Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Xinghao Stainless Steel Factory Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Xinghao Stainless Steel Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yongjiaxin Gifts And Crafts Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yongjiaxin Gifts And Crafts Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xiho Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xiho Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Bolergifts Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bolergifts Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Xinghao Stainless Steel Factory Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Xinghao Stainless Steel Factory Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Hengxin Home Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Hengxin Home Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Sw Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Sw Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Eiffel Mould & Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Eiffel Mould & Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Wenbo Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Wenbo Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Weitu Hongda Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Weitu Hongda Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Mowing Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Mowing Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Youli Electric And Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Youli Electric And Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Heng Guan Bearing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Heng Guan Bearing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhaotong Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhaotong Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Weili Auto Parts Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Weili Auto Parts Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Star Glass & Packing Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Star Glass & Packing Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Aerospace Sanyou Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Aerospace Sanyou Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Funmax Bathroom Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Funmax Bathroom Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Amiba Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Amiba Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jiayin Fasteners Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jiayin Fasteners Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fitwell Headwear & Bag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fitwell Headwear & Bag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Moka Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Moka Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Acetech Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Acetech Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026