zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Yangzhou Dixin Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Yangzhou Dixin Toys Co., Ltd. is a China-based plush toy supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 3,000+㎡ and 130+ staff. The supplier shows a relatively solid manufacturing foundation for customized plush products, supported by verified supplier status, 9 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform tags including “Socially responsible,” “Low MOQ for customization,” and “Finished product inspection.” Its recent commercial performance is strong, with 700+ orders and CN¥4M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 200+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking plush toy customization, low-MOQ trial orders, and medium-scale repeat procurement. Key limitations include a response time of ≤5 hours rather than within 1 hour, and insufficient data regarding full customization capability, detailed factory audit reports, production capacity per month, export markets, and customer references.

Yangzhou Dixin Toys Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Yangzhou Dixin Toys Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Jiangsu, China
  • Factory area: 3,000+㎡
  • Employees: 130+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated factory scale of over 3,000 square meters and more than 130 employees, indicating an established production setup rather than a small trading operation. The verified supplier status provides additional support that the company has undergone some form of platform-level verification. Based on the available data, the company appears to have a moderate manufacturing base suitable for regular plush toy production and customized product orders.

However, the provided data does not include monthly production capacity, number of production lines, machinery details, factory audit reports, or specific compliance certificates. Therefore, while the company demonstrates a credible production foundation, its full industrial capacity cannot be completely assessed.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and employee count suggest a medium-scale supplier with stable basic manufacturing capability. The verified supplier status strengthens its credibility, but the absence of detailed production capacity and formal factory audit documentation prevents it from being rated as a large-scale, highly transparent supply chain. According to the scoring standard, this aligns best with a medium-sized stable factory.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Socially responsible
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Finished product inspection
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 9 years, which indicates a relatively long-standing platform presence. Trade Assurance availability provides buyers with transaction protection through the platform. The verified supplier status further supports platform credibility. In addition, the tags “Socially responsible,” “Low MOQ for customization,” and “Finished product inspection” indicate that the supplier has platform-recognized operational and service-related labels.

That said, the data does not provide specific third-party audit names, certificate numbers, validity dates, or detailed compliance documentation. Therefore, the supplier’s platform credibility is strong, but the depth of formal compliance evidence remains partially insufficient.

Scoring Rationale

A 9-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple platform tags form a strong credibility profile. These elements indicate a mature platform presence and reduce basic transaction risk. The only limitation is the lack of detailed independent compliance documents, which prevents a perfect score.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 700+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥4M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 200+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent platform transaction activity. More than 700 orders within six months indicates active buyer engagement and repeat market demand. A transaction value above CN¥4 million further suggests that the supplier is not only receiving small sample orders but also handling meaningful commercial volume. The 4.9 store rating and 200+ reviews provide additional buyer-side validation.

The data does not break down order types, buyer regions, repeat purchase rate, or dispute rate. Therefore, while the business performance appears strong, the exact quality of the order base cannot be fully verified from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of high order count, significant transaction value, strong rating, and a reasonable number of reviews supports a high business performance score. The supplier demonstrates clear commercial traction on the platform. Minor deductions are applied because detailed transaction composition and customer profile data are not provided.

Final Score

19 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤5 hours
  • Customization-related data:
  • Product listings include multiple custom plush product types
  • Platform tag: “Low MOQ for customization”
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤5 hours is acceptable for general procurement communication, though it does not meet the highest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The company’s product information and platform tag suggest that it supports customization-related services, particularly low-MOQ customization. Product listings include customized plush items with MOQs ranging from 1 piece to 1,000 pieces depending on the product.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability. There is no information on design support, OEM/ODM workflow, sample development lead time, artwork handling, material sourcing flexibility, or engineering support. Therefore, the service capability is assessed as functional but not fully proven at a high customization-service level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates reasonable response speed and evidence of customization-related offerings. However, because the response time is not within 1 hour and full customization capability is not explicitly verified, it should not receive a top-tier score. The supplier fits the category of normal response with basic customization capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 88.6%

Elaboration

An on-time delivery rate of 88.6% places the supplier within the 80%–89% performance range. This suggests generally acceptable delivery execution, though there is still a measurable risk of late shipment. For buyers with flexible schedules or standard replenishment planning, this delivery level may be workable. For time-sensitive promotional orders, seasonal campaigns, or strict retail launch windows, additional delivery controls would be advisable.

The data does not provide average lead time, production lead time by order size, logistics method, delay reasons, or historical delivery trend. Therefore, the evaluation is based strictly on the provided on-time shipment rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring rule, an 80%–89% on-time delivery rate corresponds to 7–8 points. At 88.6%, the supplier is close to the upper end of this range, but still below the 90% threshold required for a 9–10 score.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 200+
  • Finished product inspection: Present as platform tag
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong customer feedback profile, with a 4.9 rating and more than 200 reviews. This indicates a favorable buyer experience on the platform. The “Finished product inspection” tag is also an important quality-related indicator, suggesting that the supplier has some form of final inspection process recognized in the platform information. Verified supplier status provides additional credibility regarding the company’s basic business identity and operation.

However, the data does not include detailed quality control procedures, inspection standards, defect rates, test reports, product safety certificates, or third-party quality audit results. Product listings may reference terms such as “CE” or “ASTM” in product titles, but no formal certificate documentation is provided in the supplier data; therefore, these cannot be treated as verified certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a strong quality and feedback score due to its high rating, meaningful review volume, finished product inspection tag, and verified supplier status. A slight deduction is applied because deeper quality assurance evidence, such as inspection reports, compliance certificates, and defect performance data, is not available.

Final Score

18 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 19 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 8 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 18 / 20
Total Score 87 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with standard supplier verification and order controls.

Yangzhou Dixin Toys Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers looking for customized plush toys, low-MOQ trial orders, and medium-scale recurring procurement. Its strong track record, 9-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 700+ recent orders, CN¥4M+ recent transaction value, and 4.9 rating indicate a commercially active and credible supplier.

Suitable customer types: - Plush toy importers and distributors
- E-commerce sellers requiring customized plush products
- Buyers testing low-MOQ custom plush projects
- Medium-scale purchasers needing an established factory with platform transaction history

Main risks: - Full customization capability is not explicitly confirmed: Insufficient Data
- Detailed factory audit reports and production capacity data are not provided: Insufficient Data
- On-time delivery rate is 88.6%, below the 90% top-tier benchmark
- Product safety certifications and third-party test reports are not verified in the provided data

Growth potential: The supplier shows strong platform credibility, active transaction volume, and positive customer feedback. If it can provide more transparent production capacity data, formal compliance certificates, detailed quality reports, and improved delivery performance above 90%, it could be considered a stronger long-term sourcing partner for larger or more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Ankang Meihele Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ankang Meihele Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Lixuan Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Lixuan Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Deyi Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Deyi Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sibuen Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sibuen Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Peiqi Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Peiqi Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Hengyue Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Hengyue Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comfortbaby Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comfortbaby Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexiangxin Toys Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexiangxin Toys Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shantou By Toys Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou By Toys Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xiongan Mixiaomei Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xiongan Mixiaomei Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Babidou Toys And Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Babidou Toys And Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shao Xiong Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shao Xiong Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Chenghai Yaxin Plastic Toys Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Chenghai Yaxin Plastic Toys Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Intelligence Solar Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Intelligence Solar Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Linghang Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Linghang Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Jinyuan Lamps Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Jinyuan Lamps Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hero Equipment (Yangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hero Equipment (Yangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Shenlong Rope Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Shenlong Rope Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Greenland Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Greenland Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Fujizy Elevator Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Fujizy Elevator Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Lixuan Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Lixuan Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Joan Lab Equipment (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Joan Lab Equipment (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Uwin Import And Export Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Uwin Import And Export Limited Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Moka Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Moka Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Mingtuo Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Mingtuo Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ziziguo Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ziziguo Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lanzhi (Hebei) Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lanzhi (Hebei) Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pulomax Architectural Products (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pulomax Architectural Products (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sanchuang Composite Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sanchuang Composite Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Xianteng Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Xianteng Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Xiangliyuan Steel Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Xiangliyuan Steel Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zenlea Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zenlea Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Ruili Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Ruili Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jingxin Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jingxin Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Baidi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Baidi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Binsly Stainless Steel Manufactory (Sole Proprietorship) Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Binsly Stainless Steel Manufactory (Sole Proprietorship) Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongzhiyue Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongzhiyue Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Canglong Steel Structure Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Canglong Steel Structure Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou City Dina Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou City Dina Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026