Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd. is a China-based apparel supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 6,100+㎡ and 130+ staff. The company appears to be a medium-scale garment manufacturer with verified supplier status, long-term platform presence, Trade Assurance support, and relevant operational tags including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, Warranty Available, and Socially Responsible. Its product listings focus on men’s shirts and cotton apparel items, with low minimum order quantities of 2 pieces, suggesting suitability for both sample-based sourcing and flexible small-batch procurement.

Commercial performance is relatively solid, with 70+ orders and CN¥3.1M+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is high at 4.9, although the review base is limited to 7 reviews, which reduces the depth of customer validation. Delivery performance is strong with a 96.4% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking customizable men’s apparel from a verified, experienced supplier, while larger buyers should further validate production capacity and quality consistency before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd.
• Location: Jiangsu, China
• Factory area: 6,100+㎡
• Employees: 130+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated factory footprint of over 6,100 square meters and more than 130 employees. This indicates a structured manufacturing operation rather than a purely trading-based storefront. The reported scale supports basic to medium-volume apparel production capability. The verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility of the company’s physical and operational presence.

However, the available data does not provide detailed information on monthly output, number of production lines, machinery, annual production capacity, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication. Therefore, while the company shows stable medium-scale manufacturing strength, there is insufficient data to classify it as a large-scale supply chain operation.

Scoring Rationale

A workforce of 130+ staff and a factory area of 6,100+㎡ suggest a meaningful production base for apparel manufacturing, especially for shirt and cotton garment categories. The verified supplier status adds confidence that the company has undergone some level of platform-side verification. However, the absence of detailed production capacity data, equipment details, or formal factory certification limits the score from reaching the top tier. The supplier fits best within the “medium stable factory” range.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 15 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Socially responsible
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform profile, with 15 years as a Gold Supplier and support for Trade Assurance. This is a significant credibility indicator because long platform tenure generally reflects continuity of operations and experience with international B2B transactions on . Trade Assurance provides buyers with additional transaction protection within the platform.

The supplier also carries several relevant tags, including Finished Product Inspection and Socially Responsible. These tags contribute positively to compliance and operational transparency. However, the provided data does not include specific third-party certifications, audit names, social compliance certificates, or internationally recognized quality management standards. Therefore, while the platform credibility is strong, certification depth cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 15-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple operational tags represents a mature and credible platform profile. This places the supplier near the highest range for platform and compliance credibility. The score is not a perfect 20 because the data does not list specific certification documents or independent audit standards beyond platform-provided tags.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 70+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥3.1M+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 7

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved 70+ orders and CN¥3.1M+ in transaction value over the past six months. This reflects active commercial traction and a measurable level of buyer engagement. The transaction value is relatively strong, indicating that the supplier has handled orders of meaningful commercial size.

The store rating of 4.9 is positive and suggests customer satisfaction among recorded buyers. However, the review count is only 7, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. A high score based on a small number of reviews should be interpreted cautiously, especially for buyers planning long-term or high-volume procurement.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid transaction activity, particularly through the CN¥3.1M+ six-month transaction value and 70+ orders. These figures indicate that the supplier is commercially active and has recent market validation. However, the relatively low number of reviews prevents the business performance score from entering the highest tier, because broader customer feedback is limited. Overall, this is a stable mid-to-upper performance profile.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Full Customization: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a response time of within 4 hours, which is acceptable for cross-border B2B sourcing communication. This supports reasonable communication efficiency for quotation requests, sample discussions, order clarification, and customization coordination.

The presence of the Full Customization tag is a positive service indicator, especially for apparel buyers requiring customized logos, fabric choices, design variations, or private-label production. However, the available data does not specify customization scope, sample lead time, design support capacity, language capability, or dedicated account management structure. Therefore, service capability appears good but not fully proven at a premium level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets a solid service standard with ≤4h response time and confirmed Full Customization capability. According to the scoring framework, the highest service range requires response within one hour and strong customization capability. Since the response time is not within one hour, the supplier is positioned in the normal-to-good service range rather than the top tier.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 96.4%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 96.4% is a strong delivery performance indicator. A rate above 90% suggests that the supplier generally manages order processing and shipment preparation effectively. For apparel sourcing, reliable dispatch performance is important because production delays can affect seasonal launches, retail replenishment, and promotional schedules.

The data does not provide average lead time, sample delivery time, logistics methods, or historical delay reasons. Therefore, the evaluation is based only on the reported on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

With a 96.4% on-time dispatch rate, the supplier clearly falls into the highest delivery performance band, as the benchmark states that rates above 90% qualify for 9–10 points. The score reflects strong shipment reliability based on available data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 7
• Finished Product Inspection: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive quality signal. The Finished Product Inspection tag indicates that some form of final inspection process is available before shipment. The verified supplier status also contributes to confidence in the company’s operational legitimacy. Warranty availability further supports after-sales service capability.

However, the number of reviews is only 7, which limits the strength of customer feedback evidence. The data does not include defect rates, inspection reports, AQL standards, return rates, fabric testing results, or detailed buyer complaints. Therefore, while the supplier shows several positive quality indicators, the available evidence is not sufficient to confirm consistently high quality across larger order volumes.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a strong rating, verified status, warranty availability, and Finished Product Inspection, all of which support a favorable quality assessment. Nevertheless, the low review count restricts confidence in broad customer satisfaction trends. The supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance” category rather than the highest band that requires both high ratings and substantial review volume.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with controlled initial order validation.

Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd. is a suitable supplier for buyers sourcing men’s shirts, cotton apparel, customized garments, and small-batch or flexible-order apparel products. Its 15-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier profile, 96.4% on-time dispatch rate, and CN¥3.1M+ six-month transaction value make it a credible sourcing candidate.

Suitable customer types include: - Small to medium apparel brands requiring customization
- Buyers needing low MOQ sampling or trial orders
- Importers seeking verified China-based men’s apparel suppliers
- Retailers looking for shirt and cotton garment sourcing flexibility

Main risks: - Review count is limited to 7, reducing the reliability of customer feedback analysis
- Detailed production capacity, machinery, monthly output, and formal factory certification data are not provided
- Quality control depth beyond Finished Product Inspection is insufficiently documented

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good growth potential due to long platform history, active recent transactions, strong dispatch performance, and customization capability. For larger procurement programs, buyers should request samples, inspection reports, production capacity details, and quality control procedures before placing high-volume orders.