zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Dongguan Zagumi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Dongguan Zagumi Apparel Co., Ltd.

Dongguan Zagumi Apparel Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Dongguan Zagumi Apparel Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering used clothing bales and bulk apparel products with a minimum order quantity of 450 kilograms across the listed product range. The company reports a factory area of over 12,000㎡ and more than 50 staff, indicating a moderate operating scale with basic production and processing capacity. It is identified as a verified supplier and holds Gold Supplier status for 2 years, supported by Trade Assurance and a 100% on-time delivery label.

Commercially, the supplier shows moderate transaction validation, with 20+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value over the past six months, along with a 5.0 store rating and 40+ reviews. Its strongest points are delivery reliability, platform-backed transaction protection, and positive customer feedback. However, data is insufficient regarding full customization capability, finished product inspection, detailed factory certifications, and broader quality-control systems. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale used apparel sourcing with platform protection and reliable delivery performance.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Dongguan Zagumi Apparel Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 12,000+㎡
  • Employees: 50+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area exceeding 12,000㎡, which suggests a reasonably sized operating site for handling bulk used apparel products. The employee base of 50+ staff indicates a small-to-medium workforce rather than a large-scale manufacturing organization. The presence of supplier verification strengthens the credibility of the declared company profile, although the provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly output, warehouse capacity, or specific audit certificates.

The product data shows multiple used clothing bale categories, all with a 450 kg MOQ, suggesting the supplier is structured for bulk wholesale transactions rather than small retail-level orders. However, the available information does not confirm whether the company owns complete sorting, grading, packing, inspection, or export-processing facilities.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a solid physical footprint and verified supplier status, which supports a stable basic supply capability. The 12,000+㎡ factory area is a positive indicator, but the 50+ staff count places the company below the level of a large-scale apparel supply chain operation. Since detailed factory audit reports, production capacity figures, and formal factory certifications are not provided, it should not be rated in the top tier. Overall, the supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized, operationally credible factory or trading-processing entity with adequate but not fully proven large-scale capacity.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels:
  • On-time delivery 100.0%
  • Response time ≤6h

Elaboration

The supplier has Gold Supplier status and supports Trade Assurance, which provides buyers with platform-level transaction protection. The supplier is also marked as verified, improving trustworthiness compared with unverified sellers. However, the Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 2 years, which limits the depth of long-term platform credibility.

The listed certification or industry labels mainly relate to operational performance, specifically delivery and response time. No additional formal product certifications, compliance certificates, factory audit documents, social compliance certifications, or quality management certifications are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements required for safer sourcing: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. These are meaningful indicators for reducing transaction risk. However, the 2-year Gold Supplier period is not long enough to be considered a mature long-term platform record, and the compliance information is limited. The absence of detailed certification records prevents a higher score. Therefore, the supplier is credible from a platform transaction perspective but not fully proven from a broader compliance-certification perspective.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 20+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥676.1K+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Reviews: 40+

Elaboration

The supplier has completed more than 20 orders in the past six months, with a transaction value exceeding CN¥676.1K. This indicates active commercial performance and a certain degree of market acceptance. The 5.0 store rating is very positive, and 40+ reviews provide some level of customer feedback validation.

However, the order count is moderate rather than high. The transaction value is meaningful, especially in the context of bulk used clothing products, but the available data does not provide order distribution, repeat buyer ratio, buyer regions, dispute rate, refund rate, or customer type. Therefore, while business activity is proven, the supplier cannot be classified as having high-volume commercial dominance based only on the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The company shows stable business activity with measurable recent transactions, a strong rating, and a reasonable number of reviews. The 5.0 rating is a clear strength, but the order count of 20+ over six months is not high enough for a top-tier business performance score. The transaction amount supports commercial reliability, while the limited number of reviews and absence of deeper sales-performance indicators keep the score in the stable mid-to-upper range.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤6h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within 6 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international procurement. This is suitable for standard inquiries, quotation discussions, order confirmation, and basic negotiation processes. However, the data does not state whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private labeling, customized sorting, customized packaging, buyer-specific grading, or tailored bale composition.

For used clothing bulk sourcing, customization capability may be important depending on buyer requirements, such as grade selection, seasonality, category mix, branded/non-branded ratio, packaging format, and target market preferences. Since this information is not provided, customization strength cannot be confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs reasonably well on response speed, but it does not meet the highest service standard because the response time is not within 1 hour and no full customization capability is documented. The available data supports a conclusion of basic-to-moderate service capability. Buyers requiring standard bulk used apparel procurement may find the service level acceptable, while buyers with complex customization needs should verify capability before placing large orders.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported on-time delivery rate of 100.0%, which is a strong operational indicator. This suggests that, within the recorded platform data, the supplier has successfully met delivery commitments. For bulk apparel procurement, delivery reliability is especially important because delays can affect container planning, seasonal resale cycles, and downstream distribution schedules.

No additional logistics data is provided, such as average lead time, export port, shipping methods, packaging efficiency, or late-delivery dispute history. Therefore, the evaluation is strictly based on the reported on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it deserves the maximum score in this dimension. Although more logistics details would provide a fuller picture, the available data strongly supports excellent delivery reliability.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Reviews: 40+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating and more than 40 reviews, which indicates positive customer feedback based on the platform data provided. The verified supplier status adds a degree of credibility to the company profile and operating presence. These are favorable indicators for quality confidence at the preliminary sourcing stage.

However, the provided information does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, detailed quality-control procedures, inspection standards, sorting criteria, grading consistency, defect-rate controls, or third-party quality inspection records. For used clothing bales, quality consistency is a critical procurement factor because buyers often depend on accurate grading, product mix reliability, and bale condition. The absence of specific inspection data creates a quality-verification gap.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has strong visible customer satisfaction through a perfect 5.0 rating and 40+ reviews, supported by verified supplier status. These elements justify a good score. However, because Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed and no detailed quality assurance system is provided, the supplier cannot be scored at the highest level. The score reflects good customer feedback and basic credibility, balanced against insufficient documented inspection controls.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Dongguan Zagumi Apparel Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers sourcing bulk used clothing bales who require moderate supplier scale, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and strong delivery reliability. The supplier is especially appropriate for small-to-medium importers, wholesalers, and distributors seeking platform-protected transactions with clear MOQ terms and positive store feedback.

Suitable customer types:
- Bulk used clothing wholesalers
- Importers purchasing by kilogram or bale
- Buyers requiring moderate-volume procurement
- Customers prioritizing on-time delivery and Trade Assurance protection

Main risks:
- Insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection
- Insufficient data on Full Customization capability
- Limited Gold Supplier history of 2 years
- No provided details on formal factory certifications, quality-control procedures, grading standards, or production capacity

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good potential due to its 100% on-time delivery rate, 5.0 store rating, CN¥676.1K+ recent transaction value, and verified supplier status. If it can provide clearer quality inspection documentation, customization capability, and more detailed factory compliance records, its procurement suitability could improve further for larger or more quality-sensitive buyers.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dongguan Oto Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Oto Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Jingyu Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Jingyu Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Hongyu Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Hongyu Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zagumi Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zagumi Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Vosea Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Vosea Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shows Apparel Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shows Apparel Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ningzi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ningzi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jurong Boyue Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jurong Boyue Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shiyuan Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shiyuan Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Solarwool Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Solarwool Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Huiyu Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Huiyu Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Lynguu Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Lynguu Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Nanmeiyi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Nanmeiyi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Qiandao Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Qiandao Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Boshi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Boshi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Shangyou Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Shangyou Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Zemaotong Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Zemaotong Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yigo Hardware Limited Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yigo Hardware Limited Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Wudongfang Culture Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wudongfang Culture Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Fukangyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Fukangyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nihewan Health Technology (Yangyuan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nihewan Health Technology (Yangyuan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yasunny Caps And Bags Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yasunny Caps And Bags Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bahao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bahao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengang (Guangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengang (Guangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Jindu Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Jindu Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Hualu Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Hualu Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Teamsung Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Teamsung Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sibolux Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sibolux Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Lianteng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Lianteng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yuehua Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yuehua Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Haoshuai Necktie&Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Haoshuai Necktie&Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Forsun Cnc Machinery Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Forsun Cnc Machinery Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Jiuyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Jiuyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sincereal Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sincereal Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Weidasi Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Weidasi Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Glory Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Glory Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Bafangle New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Bafangle New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou New Life Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou New Life Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026