Foshan Sibolux Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary
Foshan Sibolux Electric Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier offering electric fan-related products, including wall-mounted fans, portable fans, and plastic electric cooling products. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, with 15 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a listed 100.0% on-time delivery rate. However, its physical production scale appears relatively small, with a factory area of 1,500+㎡ and 30+ staff. Business performance data is mixed: the reported transaction value over the past six months is CN¥270.4K+, but only 1 order and 3 reviews are shown, limiting commercial validation. The supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking verified suppliers for electric fan products with relatively reliable delivery records, but buyers requiring large-scale production capacity, strong review history, or documented quality inspection systems should conduct further due diligence.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 1,500+㎡
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The company has a defined factory footprint and employee base, indicating it has basic production capability rather than operating purely as a trading entity. The Guangdong location is relevant only as provided data and is not used to infer additional industrial advantages. The reported 1,500+㎡ factory area and 30+ staff suggest a small-scale manufacturing setup. Verified supplier status provides a degree of factory credibility, but there is no provided evidence of large-scale production lines, annual capacity, automated equipment, or major factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets the threshold for basic manufacturing capability, supported by factory size, staffing, and verification status. However, the limited factory area and workforce do not support classification as a medium or large-scale stable supply chain. Since production scale details are limited, the score should remain in the small-but-functional range.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 15 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility through a long Gold Supplier history of 15 years and Trade Assurance support. Verified supplier status further strengthens platform trust. The available platform tags confirm response and delivery-related indicators, but no additional product certifications, compliance certificates, or industry-specific quality certificates are provided.

Scoring Rationale
The long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification create a strong credibility profile within the platform context. The main limitation is the absence of detailed product compliance certifications or broader certification labels. Still, based on the provided platform data, this is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 1
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
- Store rating: 4.0
- Number of reviews: 3

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded transaction activity, with CN¥270.4K+ in transaction value over the past six months. However, the reported order count is only 1, which indicates limited recent order frequency. The store rating of 4.0 is acceptable but not high, and the review count of 3 is very limited, making customer validation weak.

Scoring Rationale
Although the transaction amount is not negligible, the low number of orders and very small review base reduce confidence in sustained commercial performance. The available data does not support a high-performance rating, because repeat order volume and broad customer feedback are insufficient.

Final Score
10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a listed response time of ≤3 hours, which indicates acceptable communication responsiveness. However, there is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM design services beyond the product title wording, engineering customization, packaging customization, or dedicated account support.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is positive but does not meet the highest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not documented in the provided data, the service score should reflect normal responsiveness but limited confirmed service depth.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest possible delivery indicator within the provided data. No additional details are available regarding shipment volume, delivery regions, logistics partners, or historical delivery sample size.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the stated delivery rate, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance band. The score is strong, though buyers should note that the underlying order sample size is not provided beyond the overall business data showing 1 order in the past six months.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.0
- Reviews: 3
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.0 store rating, but the review count is only 3, which limits the reliability of customer feedback. Verified supplier status provides some quality-related credibility at the supplier level, but there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing systems, third-party inspection reports, or specific product certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic quality credibility through verification and a moderate rating, but the limited number of reviews and lack of documented inspection systems prevent a higher score. Quality confidence is present but not strongly validated by customer feedback or inspection data.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

71 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking -verified electric fan suppliers with Trade Assurance support, long platform history, and strong reported delivery performance. The supplier appears more suitable for small to medium buyers or trial procurement rather than buyers requiring highly validated large-scale production capacity.

Key risks include limited factory scale, only 1 order in the past six months, just 3 customer reviews, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or product compliance certifications. Growth potential exists through its 15-year Gold Supplier history, verified status, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate, but buyers should request factory audit documents, product inspection records, samples, and recent order references before placing large-volume orders.