Foshan Juber Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Foshan Juber Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based electric appliance supplier with a reported factory area of 8,500+ m² and 70+ staff. The company offers multiple fan-related products, including 12-inch box fans, 56-inch electric/industrial fans, and remote stand fans, with MOQs ranging from 500 pieces to 1,000 cartons. Its platform profile shows 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, response time within 3 hours, and 100.0% on-time delivery. Commercially, the supplier recorded 5 orders and CN¥3.3M+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 5.0 store rating but only 2 reviews. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking electric fan products from a medium-scale factory with strong platform credibility and delivery reliability. However, the limited order count, very small review base, and lack of disclosed customization or inspection system data require cautious qualification before large-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 8,500+ m²
- Employees: 70+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Guangdong, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a mid-sized production footprint, with 8,500+ m² of factory space and over 70 employees. This indicates a meaningful manufacturing base rather than a very small workshop. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operational presence, although no detailed factory audit report, production line count, annual capacity, or equipment information is provided.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates stable medium-scale production capability based on factory size and workforce. However, the available data does not prove large-scale supply chain depth, advanced production automation, or high-volume capacity. Therefore, it fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale category.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Other product or system certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively long operating history, with 7 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance support and verified supplier status provide important platform-level safeguards for international buyers. The listed tags also support basic operational credibility, especially in response speed and delivery reliability.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has strong platform credibility due to Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the data does not show detailed compliance certifications, product safety certifications, factory audit documents, or industry-specific certification labels. This prevents a full-score assessment but still places the supplier in a strong credibility range.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 5
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥3.3M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 2

Elaboration
The supplier shows a high reported transaction value of CN¥3.3M+ over the past six months, suggesting that at least some orders may be relatively large in value. However, the order count is low at 5, and the review count is only 2, which limits the strength of commercial validation from a buyer feedback perspective.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction amount is a positive signal, but the low number of orders and very limited reviews reduce confidence in repeat market validation. The 5.0 rating is favorable, yet the small review sample makes it less statistically reliable. The supplier should be viewed as commercially active but not yet strongly validated by broad order volume or customer feedback.

Final Score
14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for B2B sourcing. However, no data is provided regarding Full Customization, OEM/ODM service, private labeling, packaging customization, or engineering support.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is good but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not disclosed, the supplier cannot be rated as having strong custom service capacity. The score reflects reliable basic responsiveness with insufficient evidence of advanced service capability.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery metric provided in the dataset. This is a positive indicator for procurement planning, especially for buyers concerned with shipment reliability and order scheduling.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, delivery performance above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 range. A 100.0% on-time delivery rate supports a top score in this category. However, the dataset does not specify the number of shipments behind this metric, so the score is strong but should still be interpreted alongside the low six-month order count.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 2
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier field
- Product quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the review count is very low at only 2. Verified supplier status provides some platform-level assurance, but there is no specific information confirming Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, quality control systems, or third-party quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The quality signal is mixed. The rating is excellent, but the limited number of reviews weakens the reliability of customer feedback. Verified supplier status supports basic credibility, but the absence of disclosed inspection and quality management data prevents a higher score. The supplier shows acceptable quality indicators but lacks robust evidence of a mature quality assurance system.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled qualification. Foshan Juber Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing electric fan products who value platform credibility, Trade Assurance, medium-scale factory capacity, and strong reported delivery performance. It may be appropriate for small to medium wholesale buyers or importers placing structured trial orders.

Key risks include low six-month order count, only 2 customer reviews, insufficient data on Full Customization, and insufficient disclosure of Finished Product Inspection or product certifications. Growth potential exists due to its 7-year Gold Supplier status, CN¥3.3M+ recent transaction value, verified supplier status, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate. For larger procurement programs, buyers should request quality inspection records, product compliance documents, production capacity details, and sample validation before scaling orders.