zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Yiwu Suoke Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Yiwu Suoke Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, focused on electric grooming products such as USB rechargeable hair trimmers, men’s body grooming shavers, cordless beard clippers, and household shaving devices. Based on the provided data, the company operates from a factory area of 1,100+ m² with 30+ staff and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating basic manufacturing infrastructure and a certain level of supplier credibility. On , the company has 3 years as a Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and carries service/quality-related labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and Warranty available. Its recent business performance is moderate to solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥608.5K+ transaction value over the past six months. The supplier appears suitable for small to medium-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ grooming appliances with customization options, while larger buyers should further verify production scalability before bulk cooperation.

Yiwu Suoke Electric Appliance Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Yiwu Suoke Electric Appliance Co., Ltd.
  • Country: China
  • Province: Zhejiang
  • Factory area: 1,100+ m²
  • Employees: 30+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical manufacturing base of over 1,100 square meters and a workforce of more than 30 employees. This indicates that the company has an established operational setup rather than functioning purely as a trading entity, based on the provided factory and staffing information. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operational profile, suggesting that at least some level of supplier verification has been completed.

However, compared with larger-scale manufacturers, the factory size and staff count remain relatively modest. The available data does not indicate large-scale automated production lines, multiple workshops, annual capacity, advanced equipment, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have basic production capability, the data does not support classifying it as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale

The company fits the profile of a small to lower-mid-sized factory with basic production capacity. The 1,100+ m² factory area and 30+ staff provide evidence of real manufacturing capability, and the verified supplier status improves confidence. However, the limited scale prevents a higher score under the “large-scale stable supply chain” category. Since the company has more than minimal infrastructure and verification, it should score above the weakest range, but not reach the mid-to-large factory bracket.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. It has been a Gold Supplier for 3 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. These factors are meaningful for procurement risk control because they provide platform-level transaction protection and supplier visibility.

The presence of labels such as Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and ODM service available also strengthens the supplier’s platform profile. These labels suggest that the supplier presents itself as capable of supporting quality checks, after-sales warranty arrangements, and customization services. However, the Gold Supplier history is still relatively short at 3 years, and the provided data does not include third-party management system certifications, product compliance certifications, or detailed audit reports.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and multiple relevant service/quality labels. The main limitation is that the Gold Supplier period is not long enough to be considered a long-term mature platform history, and no additional formal certification details are provided. Therefore, the supplier falls into the “core certifications are complete but duration is relatively short” range.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥608.5K+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 300 orders over the past six months, with transaction value exceeding CN¥608.5K. This shows that the supplier has active commercial traction and is not merely a dormant platform listing. The combination of order count and transaction value indicates a reasonable level of buyer activity, particularly for grooming appliances with relatively low unit prices.

The store rating of 4.6 is positive, though not exceptionally high. The 100+ reviews provide a useful feedback base, but the volume is not large enough to classify the supplier as highly proven across a very broad buyer pool. Overall, the business data reflects stable and active platform performance, but not yet top-tier transaction dominance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid mid-level commercial validation. The 300+ orders and CN¥608.5K+ transaction value over six months indicate consistent demand and active buyer engagement. The 4.6 rating is good, and the 100+ reviews support credibility, though the rating and review base do not justify a maximum score. This places the supplier in the stable medium-scale transaction category.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM service available: Yes, based on platform label

Elaboration

The supplier reports a response time of within 2 hours, which is acceptable for B2B sourcing communication and indicates reasonable responsiveness. In addition, the platform labels show Full Customization and ODM service available, suggesting the supplier can support customized product requirements to some extent.

However, the response time is not within one hour, which is the benchmark for the highest service capability score. Also, the provided data does not specify customization scope, sample lead time, engineering support, packaging customization capability, language support, or dedicated account management. Therefore, the service capability appears solid but cannot be rated at the highest level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has good communication responsiveness and clear customization-related labels. A response time of ≤2h is commercially acceptable, especially when combined with Full Customization and ODM service availability. However, since the response time does not meet the ≤1h threshold for the top range, and further service process details are not provided, the score should remain in the upper part of the normal service capability range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery indicator in the provided dataset. This suggests that recent platform-recorded shipments have been completed within the expected delivery timeframe.

However, the data does not include the number of shipments behind this delivery metric, average lead time, peak-season performance, logistics methods, or delay handling process. Therefore, the score can be high based on the stated on-time delivery rate, while procurement teams should still verify delivery capability for larger or customized orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s stated on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, it meets the highest delivery performance range. No negative delivery data is provided.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 100+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Yes, based on platform label

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.6 and more than 100 reviews, showing generally positive customer feedback with a meaningful but not very large review base. The presence of Finished Product Inspection indicates that the supplier provides a product inspection mechanism before shipment or completion, which supports basic quality control.

The verified supplier status further improves trust in the company profile. The Warranty available label is also a positive signal for after-sales support. However, the provided data does not include defect rates, inspection standards, product test reports, customer complaint details, return rates, or product compliance certificates. Therefore, while the available information supports a good quality profile, it does not justify a top-tier quality score.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has good customer feedback, a reasonable number of reviews, and relevant quality-related platform labels. Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status provide meaningful quality assurance support. However, the 4.6 rating is good rather than outstanding, and the review count of 100+ is moderate. Because detailed quality certification and defect performance data are not provided, the supplier should be rated as good with basic-to-solid quality assurance, not excellent.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total Score 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for selective cooperation, especially for small to medium-sized procurement projects.

Yiwu Suoke Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. shows a solid supplier profile for electric grooming appliances, supported by verified supplier status, 3-year Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service availability, and a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its recent commercial activity of 300+ orders and CN¥608.5K+ transaction value over six months indicates active market validation.

Suitable customer types:
- Small to medium-sized importers
- E-commerce sellers
- Buyers seeking low-MOQ grooming appliance products
- Buyers requiring customization or ODM support
- Procurement teams looking for suppliers with Trade Assurance protection

Main risks:
- Factory scale is relatively limited, with 1,100+ m² and 30+ staff
- No detailed production capacity data provided
- No product compliance certificates provided in the dataset
- No detailed audit report, defect rate, or inspection standard information provided
- Store rating is good at 4.6, but not at a top-tier level

Growth potential:
The supplier has positive growth indicators, including active order volume, customization capability, ODM service availability, warranty label, and full on-time delivery performance. If further verification confirms stable production capacity, product compliance, and quality control procedures, the supplier could be a viable long-term partner for mid-volume grooming appliance sourcing.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Yiwu Jinmin Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jinmin Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Mingge Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Mingge Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hengbo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hengbo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hengyao Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hengyao Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Buder Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Buder Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Kemei Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Kemei Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Jufa Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Jufa Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huipu Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huipu Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Seaman Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Seaman Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yexin Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yexin Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Jindewei Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Jindewei Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huapo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huapo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Peichen Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Peichen Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Boou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Boou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Kaison Electric Appliance Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Kaison Electric Appliance Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Spx Electric Appliance Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Spx Electric Appliance Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Lamo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Lamo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Banshen Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Banshen Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jiaye Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jiaye Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Qidian Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Qidian Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Juxin Husbandry Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Juxin Husbandry Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Trb Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Trb Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Jiayuan Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Jiayuan Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lanzhou Jintudi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lanzhou Jintudi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Keering Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Keering Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Renji Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Renji Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Naile Holdings Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Naile Holdings Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Hortlight Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Hortlight Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Haoheng New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Haoheng New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Renqiu Puxin Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Renqiu Puxin Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sanvo Chemical Industry Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sanvo Chemical Industry Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Feihong Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Feihong Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sunkings Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sunkings Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hogn Electrical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hogn Electrical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Shengda Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Shengda Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Rongfeng Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Rongfeng Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Oumei Lubricant Technology (Fujian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Oumei Lubricant Technology (Fujian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Flysak Lubrication Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Flysak Lubrication Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fengqingyuan(Shandong) Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fengqingyuan(Shandong) Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lu Qing Industrial Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lu Qing Industrial Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026