zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Fujian Shengda Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Fujian Shengda Communication Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Fujian, with a reported factory area of 3,500+ m² and 60+ staff. Based on the provided -related data, the company shows a relatively solid sourcing profile: 11 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service availability, and a response time within 2 hours. Its recent commercial performance is also strong, with 200+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews.

The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking communication-related products with moderate customization requirements, low-to-medium MOQ flexibility, and a platform-backed transaction process. Key strengths include platform credibility, delivery reliability, and customer feedback. Main limitations are its medium-sized factory scale and the absence of more detailed information on production capacity, export markets, customer portfolio, and formal third-party management system certifications.

Fujian Shengda Communication Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Fujian Shengda Communication Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Fujian, China
  • Factory area: 3,500+ m²
  • Employees: 60+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated physical manufacturing base with 3,500+ m² of factory space and more than 60 employees. This indicates that the company is not merely a small trading entity based on the provided data, and it has a defined operational footprint. The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the company profile and supports the view that the supplier has undergone some level of platform or factory verification.

However, the available data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly output, equipment lists, R&D team size, warehouse capacity, or export shipment history. Therefore, while the company demonstrates basic-to-medium factory strength, there is insufficient data to classify it as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale

A factory size of 3,500+ m² and 60+ staff suggests a stable but medium-scale production operation. The verified supplier status improves confidence in its operational legitimacy. However, compared with large-scale manufacturers, the available scale indicators remain moderate, and production capacity details are not provided. Therefore, the company fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale category.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier history: 11 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Finished Product Inspection
  • Full Customization
  • ODM service available
  • Response time ≤2h

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. An 11-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, which is an important credibility factor for international buyers using as a sourcing channel. Trade Assurance support further reduces transactional risk by providing a platform-backed purchasing mechanism.

The supplier also carries several platform-visible capability tags, including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and ODM service availability. These labels suggest that the supplier has passed certain platform-recognized checks or declarations related to product inspection and service capability. The verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility profile.

At the same time, the data does not provide specific ISO, CE, FCC, RoHS, or other formal product or management system certifications. Therefore, the score should recognize strong platform credibility while avoiding unsupported claims about formal compliance certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 11 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple capability tags represents a mature and credible supplier profile. The only limitation is the lack of detailed formal certification information beyond platform tags. As a result, the supplier is close to the highest credibility range but not assigned a perfect score.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.2M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Number of reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong recent commercial activity. More than 200 orders over the past six months indicate that the store has active market demand and recurring buyer engagement. A transaction value above CN¥1.2M within the same period further supports the conclusion that the supplier has meaningful business throughput rather than only low-volume sample sales.

The store rating of 4.9 is high, and 100+ reviews provide a reasonable level of customer feedback volume. This combination of order volume, transaction value, rating, and review count suggests that the supplier has been commercially validated by multiple buyers on the platform.

However, the data does not specify repeat purchase rate, buyer country distribution, average order value, or major customer types. Therefore, while performance is strong, there remains limited visibility into customer structure and long-term account stability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s recent performance metrics are clearly above basic validation level. The order count and transaction value are both strong for platform-based procurement evaluation, and the high store rating supports positive buyer experience. The score is placed in the high-performance range, with a slight deduction due to missing data on repeat buyers, export markets, and customer concentration.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier shows good service capability based on platform-disclosed indicators. A response time of ≤2 hours is efficient and suitable for international sourcing communication, although it does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service availability indicates that the supplier can likely support customized product requirements beyond standard catalog sales.

This is relevant for buyers requiring product adaptation, branding, or design-related support. However, the data does not provide details on customization scope, engineering team structure, sample development lead time, design file requirements, or customization case examples. Therefore, the customization capability should be recognized but not over-expanded beyond the provided tags.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in response speed and customization indicators. The ≤2h response time is commercially acceptable, and Full Customization plus ODM service strengthens service capability. However, because the response time is not ≤1h and customization depth is not detailed, the supplier is best evaluated in the strong but not top-tier service range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 98.6%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a very strong on-time delivery rate of 98.6%. This exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring band and indicates reliable fulfillment performance based on the provided data. For procurement teams, this is a positive indicator, especially when sourcing products with project timelines, resale commitments, or inventory planning requirements.

The available data does not include average lead time, production lead time by product category, shipping method, delay causes, or peak-season capacity constraints. Therefore, the evaluation is based strictly on the disclosed on-time shipment rate.

Scoring Rationale

A 98.6% on-time delivery rate is significantly above the 90% benchmark and supports a top-tier delivery score. Since no contrary delivery data is provided, the supplier receives a full score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 100+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier shows a strong quality and feedback profile. A 4.9 store rating indicates high customer satisfaction, while 100+ reviews provide a meaningful feedback base. The Finished Product Inspection tag suggests that the supplier has a product inspection process or platform-recognized inspection capability before shipment. Verified supplier status also supports the reliability of the company profile.

These elements indicate that the supplier has both buyer-side validation and basic quality assurance visibility. However, the data does not include defect rates, warranty terms, inspection reports, product testing standards, third-party certificates, quality control staffing, or after-sales dispute records. Therefore, the supplier’s quality profile is strong but not fully transparent at the technical compliance level.

Scoring Rationale

The high rating, review volume, Finished Product Inspection tag, and verified supplier status justify a high score. The score is not perfect because detailed quality system documentation and formal product certifications are not provided. The supplier appears to have a credible basic quality assurance structure, but additional due diligence would be needed for technical or regulated procurement projects.

Final Score

18 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 18 / 20
Total Score 88 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with standard supplier verification before bulk orders.

Fujian Shengda Communication Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a platform-verified Chinese supplier with stable credibility, active transaction history, strong delivery performance, and customization/ODM service capability. It may be particularly suitable for small-to-medium volume procurement, customized sourcing projects, trial orders, and buyers who prefer Trade Assurance-backed transactions.

Suitable customer types:
- Importers seeking communication-related product sourcing through
- Distributors requiring moderate MOQ flexibility
- Buyers needing Full Customization or ODM service support
- Procurement teams prioritizing supplier responsiveness and on-time delivery

Main risk points:
- Production capacity details are insufficient beyond factory area and employee count
- Formal product or management system certifications are not provided
- No data on export markets, key customers, repeat purchase rate, or technical QC reports
- Customization depth and engineering capability require further confirmation

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong platform maturity, commercial activity, customer feedback, and delivery reliability. If it can provide more detailed certification documents, production capacity evidence, and quality control records, it could become a stronger candidate for larger-volume or more technically demanding procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Quanzhou Shengda Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Shengda Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Shengda Commerical & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Shengda Commerical & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Shengda Khumic Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Shengda Khumic Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Shengda Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Shengda Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Xingye Shengda Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Xingye Shengda Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaiteng Communication Co., Ltd., Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaiteng Communication Co., Ltd., Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenxing Optical Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenxing Optical Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wudongfang Culture Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wudongfang Culture Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Yaxun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Yaxun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Tianlu Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Tianlu Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nan'An Hengshun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nan'An Hengshun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Xianglong Communication Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Xianglong Communication Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sipu Communication Equipment Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sipu Communication Equipment Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Feibo Guangtong Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Feibo Guangtong Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xin Xin Da Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xin Xin Da Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tti Fiber Communication Tech. Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tti Fiber Communication Tech. Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kedi Communication Equipment Sales Department (General Partnership) Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kedi Communication Equipment Sales Department (General Partnership) Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Unik Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Unik Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Xiongxian Kaixin Cap Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiongxian Kaixin Cap Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jinfa Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jinfa Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sway Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sway Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei American Airlines Lubricants Oil Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei American Airlines Lubricants Oil Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Gavin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Gavin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bao-Wu(Tianjin) Import & Export Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bao-Wu(Tianjin) Import & Export Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Dream-Start Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Dream-Start Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Docan Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Docan Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mufeng Paper Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mufeng Paper Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Renyang Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Renyang Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Optimal Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Optimal Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Step Joy Footwear Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Step Joy Footwear Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jyd Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jyd Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jingran Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jingran Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Dabo Jin Integrated Housing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Dabo Jin Integrated Housing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Hengxing Jinqiao Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Hengxing Jinqiao Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Keycool Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Keycool Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Twinkle Tourist Articles Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Twinkle Tourist Articles Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Yipai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Yipai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026