zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd.

Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering fiber optic and FTTH-related communication equipment and accessories. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but operationally established supplier, with a factory area of over 1,800㎡, more than 20 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and an on-time delivery rate of 92.6%. Business performance shows moderate commercial validation, with over 30 orders and more than CN¥5.3M transaction value in the past six months, although the review volume remains limited at 10+. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking fiber optic accessories, FTTH components, and related communication equipment with relatively low MOQ options. Key risks include limited workforce scale, limited review base, and insufficient data on full customization capability and finished product inspection systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company name: Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd.
  • Country/region: China
  • Factory location: Zhejiang
  • Factory area: 1,800+㎡
  • Employee count: 20+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed factory area of over 1,800㎡ and a workforce of more than 20 employees. This indicates that the company has a physical production or operational base, but the scale is relatively small compared with larger industrial manufacturers. The verified supplier status provides some confidence that the company has undergone a form of platform or supplier verification. However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly output capacity, machinery lists, quality department size, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing and supply capability, supported by a physical factory, staff base, and verified supplier status. However, with only 1,800+㎡ and 20+ staff, it should not be classified as a large-scale or highly integrated production facility based on the available information. The supplier fits the category of a small but established factory with basic production capability and some verification support. Lack of detailed production capacity data prevents a higher score.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification/industry tags provided: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 92.6%”

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 9 years, which indicates a relatively long-standing platform presence. Trade Assurance is available, providing transaction protection for buyers using the platform. The company is also marked as a verified supplier, which strengthens platform-level credibility. However, the provided certification or industry tags mainly relate to response time and delivery performance. No specific third-party product certifications, management system certifications, or industry compliance documents are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs strongly in platform credibility due to its 9-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. These elements support a relatively high level of buyer confidence for platform-based procurement. However, because no formal product certifications, factory audit certificates, ISO certificates, or telecom-related compliance documents are provided, the compliance portion cannot be considered fully complete. Therefore, the score is strong but not at the maximum level.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 30+
  • Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥5.3M+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 30 orders over the past six months, with transaction value exceeding CN¥5.3M. This suggests meaningful commercial activity and a relatively strong average transaction value. The store rating of 4.7 is positive and indicates generally favorable buyer feedback. However, the review count is only 10+, which is not sufficient to represent a broad customer feedback base. The order volume is moderate rather than high, while transaction amount is comparatively stronger.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows solid transaction value and acceptable recent order activity, indicating that it has been commercially active and has completed meaningful sales through the platform. The 4.7 rating supports buyer satisfaction to some extent. However, the relatively low review count limits the strength of commercial validation, and 30+ orders over six months reflects moderate rather than high-volume activity. The business performance is therefore assessed as stable and mid-level.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within 3 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online procurement. This is helpful for quotation handling, order coordination, and general pre-sales communication. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports full customization, OEM/ODM services, private labeling, engineering customization, or product modification services.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤3h demonstrates reasonable service responsiveness, although it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since full customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be scored as having strong customization service capacity. The score reflects normal communication performance but limited confirmed evidence of advanced service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 92.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 92.6%, which is above the 90% threshold. This indicates that the supplier generally performs well in meeting delivery schedules. For buyers sourcing communication equipment and FTTH accessories, delivery reliability is important because such products are often used in project-based installation, maintenance, or network deployment schedules.

Scoring Rationale

According to the provided scoring framework, suppliers with an on-time delivery rate above 90% should receive 9 to 10 points. At 92.6%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery reliability. However, the rate is not extremely high, and no additional details are provided regarding average lead time, shipment delay causes, logistics options, or urgent order handling. Therefore, a strong but not perfect score is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 10+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.7, which is generally positive. The verified supplier status provides some support for quality and operational credibility. However, the number of reviews is limited at 10+, which restricts the reliability of customer feedback as a broad quality indicator. Additionally, the data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection procedures, quality control certifications, inspection reports, or third-party product testing.

Scoring Rationale

The positive store rating and verified supplier status support a reasonable quality confidence level. However, the limited review count means the customer feedback base is not large enough to strongly validate consistent quality performance. The absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection data also prevents the supplier from being rated as having a complete quality assurance system. Therefore, the supplier is assessed as having acceptable quality indicators but incomplete quality transparency.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing FTTH accessories, fiber optic components, waterproof fiber optic boxes, LC-related FTTH products, cabinets, and indoor fiber optic products within the categories provided. The supplier is suitable for small to medium-sized procurement programs, trial orders, and buyers who value platform transaction protection through Trade Assurance.

The main strengths are its 9-year Gold Supplier status, verified supplier identity, Trade Assurance support, CN¥5.3M+ transaction value in the past six months, and 92.6% on-time delivery rate. These indicators show credible platform activity and relatively reliable delivery performance.

The main risks are the small factory scale, limited staff size, low review volume, and insufficient data regarding full customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, formal quality certifications, and detailed production capacity. Before placing large-volume or project-critical orders, buyers should request product specifications, inspection procedures, production capacity details, sample validation, and quality control documentation.

Overall, the supplier has good platform credibility and moderate business validation, with growth potential if it can provide stronger quality documentation, more customer feedback, and clearer customization or production capability evidence.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Cixi Yaxun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Yaxun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nan'An Hengshun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nan'An Hengshun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sipu Communication Equipment Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sipu Communication Equipment Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Feibo Guangtong Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Feibo Guangtong Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kedi Communication Equipment Sales Department (General Partnership) Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kedi Communication Equipment Sales Department (General Partnership) Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Meilan Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Meilan Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Taojun Refrigeration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Taojun Refrigeration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mingou Cleaning Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mingou Cleaning Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Diya Industrial Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Diya Industrial Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Shengda Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Shengda Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaiteng Communication Co., Ltd., Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaiteng Communication Co., Ltd., Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Super Commercial Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Super Commercial Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Fenghua Jery Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Fenghua Jery Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Golden Yangtze River Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Golden Yangtze River Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenxing Optical Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenxing Optical Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wudongfang Culture Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wudongfang Culture Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Tianlu Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Tianlu Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Xianglong Communication Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Xianglong Communication Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jing Xin Tai Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jing Xin Tai Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Foshan Shanghong Ceramics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shanghong Ceramics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Donnwe Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Donnwe Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Stone Cable Sales Depatrtment Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Stone Cable Sales Depatrtment Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Anrui Food Ingredients Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Anrui Food Ingredients Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinzhou Tiegong Railway Maintenance Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinzhou Tiegong Railway Maintenance Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Rollmed Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Rollmed Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dakun Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dakun Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sanyu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sanyu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingsheng Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingsheng Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shengchun Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shengchun Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
York International Hk Limited Supplier Evaluation
York International Hk Limited Supplier Evaluation
Jianyang Greenfir New Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jianyang Greenfir New Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Haiqiang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Haiqiang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Magic Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Magic Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Handsome Beauty  Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Handsome Beauty Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Shufukang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Shufukang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Mengtian Agricultural Technology (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Mengtian Agricultural Technology (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Yitex Technical Fabrics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Yitex Technical Fabrics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Yaolong Metal Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Yaolong Metal Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026