zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Wudongfang Culture Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Wudongfang Culture Communication Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based supplier with a reported factory area of 1,200+㎡ and 110+ staff, indicating a small-to-mid-sized operational base with established production capacity. The company is listed as a verified supplier and has an 8-year Gold Supplier history with Trade Assurance support, giving it relatively strong platform credibility. Its recent commercial performance is moderate to strong, with 100+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a high store rating of 4.9, though the review volume of 30+ remains limited. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ vintage-style ballet or performance costume products, especially those valuing platform-backed transactions and moderate customization communication. Key limitations include insufficient data on full customization capability, finished product inspection systems, and detailed factory certification scope. Overall, this supplier is recommended for trial or controlled-volume procurement rather than immediate large-scale strategic sourcing.

Shenzhen Wudongfang Culture Communication Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 1,200+㎡
  • Employees: 110+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area of over 1,200㎡ and a workforce of more than 110 employees. This suggests the company has a structured operating base and is beyond a very small workshop scale. The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to its claimed company profile and indicates that some level of supplier verification has been completed.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly output capacity, machinery list, in-house quality team size, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company demonstrates basic-to-moderate manufacturing strength, the data is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale supply chain operation.

Scoring Rationale

The company has a reasonable workforce size and a measurable factory area, supporting a stable small-to-mid-sized production profile. Verified supplier status improves confidence in its operational legitimacy. Nevertheless, the factory area is not large, and there is insufficient data on production volume, equipment, or detailed audit certification. Therefore, the supplier fits the “medium stable factory” range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / platform labels: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 85.6%”
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has an 8-year Gold Supplier history on , which is a meaningful indicator of platform continuity. Trade Assurance support provides additional transaction protection for buyers, especially for first-time or cross-border purchases. Verified supplier status further strengthens its platform credibility.

The available platform labels cover response speed and delivery performance. However, the data does not show additional certifications such as ISO, product compliance certificates, third-party factory audit documents, or industry-specific certificates. As a result, the supplier has strong -platform credibility but limited evidence of broader compliance certifications beyond the platform environment.

Scoring Rationale

An 8-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status represent a solid platform credibility profile. These factors support buyer confidence and reduce transaction risk. However, because no detailed third-party compliance certificates or factory audit documents are provided, the supplier does not reach the maximum score range for a fully complete compliance system.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥676.1K+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved more than 100 orders and over CN¥676.1K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates a functioning commercial track record and active buyer demand on the platform. The store rating of 4.9 is strong and suggests generally positive buyer satisfaction.

However, the number of reviews is only 30+, which is relatively limited compared with suppliers that have large-scale and highly validated transaction histories. The order count and transaction amount are positive, but the review base is not yet deep enough to fully validate long-term consistency across a broad customer group.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stable recent business activity, with a meaningful transaction value and over 100 recent orders. The high rating supports positive buyer experience. The main limitation is the modest number of reviews, which reduces the depth of commercial validation. Therefore, the supplier is positioned in the upper-middle business performance range, but not at the highest level.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency and relatively responsive customer service. This is important for buyers managing samples, specifications, order confirmation, and delivery coordination.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, design modification, sizing customization, or material customization. Since customization capability is a key factor in service evaluation, the lack of this information limits the score.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows good response speed, but the service capability cannot be rated as highly advanced because there is no evidence of full customization support. Based strictly on the available data, the supplier fits the range of normal service responsiveness with insufficient proof of strong customization capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 85.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 85.6%. This indicates a generally acceptable delivery record, but it also suggests that some orders may experience shipment delays. For buyers with strict event deadlines, seasonal selling windows, or performance costume delivery schedules, this metric should be monitored carefully.

The delivery performance is within the 80–89% range, which reflects moderate reliability but not best-in-class logistics execution.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 85.6%, the supplier is in the middle-to-upper part of this band. The performance is acceptable for standard procurement but may require clearer delivery terms and milestone tracking for time-sensitive orders.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 30+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive indicator of customer satisfaction. The review count of 30+ provides some feedback validation, although it is not a large sample size. Verified supplier status supports basic credibility, but the available data does not clearly confirm whether the supplier has a formal Finished Product Inspection process.

No specific quality management certifications, product inspection procedures, defect rate data, or third-party inspection reports are provided. Therefore, the supplier’s quality profile is supported mainly by customer rating and platform verification rather than a fully documented quality assurance system.

Scoring Rationale

The strong rating supports a positive quality impression, and verified supplier status adds a basic layer of trust. However, the relatively limited number of reviews and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection prevent a higher score. The supplier can be considered to have good customer feedback but incomplete quality system transparency.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 8 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 81 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for trial cooperation and controlled-volume procurement.

Shenzhen Wudongfang Culture Communication Co., Ltd. shows a solid platform background, with 8 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a strong 4.9 store rating. Its 100+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value over the past six months indicate active market demand and reasonable commercial validation.

This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ vintage-style ballet, tutu, or performance costume products, especially small to mid-sized buyers, boutique costume retailers, dancewear sellers, or buyers testing niche product demand.

Key risks include: - Insufficient Data on full customization capability
- Insufficient Data on Finished Product Inspection processes
- On-time delivery rate of 85.6%, which is acceptable but not excellent
- Review volume of 30+, which provides limited long-term quality validation

Growth potential is present due to its established platform history, responsive communication, and recent transaction activity. Before scaling orders, buyers should request samples, confirm customization scope, clarify inspection standards, and use Trade Assurance for initial transactions.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen Kaiteng Communication Co., Ltd., Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaiteng Communication Co., Ltd., Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenxing Optical Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenxing Optical Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xin Xin Da Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xin Xin Da Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tti Fiber Communication Tech. Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tti Fiber Communication Tech. Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huanhai Culture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huanhai Culture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Dream Culture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Dream Culture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Reliabo Culture & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Reliabo Culture & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qeok (Guangdong) Clothing Culture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qeok (Guangdong) Clothing Culture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Shengda Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Shengda Communication Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Doc Culture Creative Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Doc Culture Creative Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Rovellc Culture And Tourism Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Rovellc Culture And Tourism Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Anna Hair Art Culture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Anna Hair Art Culture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Manka Ceramic Culture Development Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Manka Ceramic Culture Development Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Yaxun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Yaxun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Tianlu Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Tianlu Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nan'An Hengshun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nan'An Hengshun Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Xianglong Communication Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Xianglong Communication Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou New Ade Culture Media Group Co.Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou New Ade Culture Media Group Co.Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Shengqi Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Shengqi Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shantou City Dina Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou City Dina Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Aston Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Aston Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fushan Medical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fushan Medical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui He He New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui He He New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Honghao Electron Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Honghao Electron Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hongchen Irrigation Euqipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hongchen Irrigation Euqipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiaxing Ochs Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiaxing Ochs Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bao-Wu(Tianjin) Import & Export Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bao-Wu(Tianjin) Import & Export Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fortune Technology Group Supplier Evaluation
Fortune Technology Group Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fung Hing Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fung Hing Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Deou Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Deou Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Yizhilin Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Yizhilin Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Dongjia Textile Machinery Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Dongjia Textile Machinery Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Clen Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Clen Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yijiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yijiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kerong Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kerong Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Guopai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Guopai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hyxion Smart Kitchen Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hyxion Smart Kitchen Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Xingtan Taicheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Xingtan Taicheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Aoben Autoparts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Aoben Autoparts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026