Qeok (Guangdong) Clothing Culture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Qeok (Guangdong) Clothing Culture Co., Ltd. is a China-based apparel supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 2,800+㎡ and 50+ staff. The company appears to be positioned as a small-to-medium clothing manufacturer or trading-manufacturing supplier focused on women’s shirts, custom logo shirts, Hawaiian shirts, plaid work shirts, and related apparel items with relatively low MOQ options. Its profile shows strong platform credibility, including 17 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, and customization-related labels. Business performance is relatively solid, with 200+ orders and CN¥6.7M+ transaction value over the past six months, although the review count is limited at 10+. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-to-medium volume customized apparel sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection. Key limitations include limited disclosed scale, response time of ≤5 hours rather than rapid response, and insufficient data on full customization capability.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Company name: Qeok (Guangdong) Clothing Culture Co., Ltd.
- Country/Province: China, Guangdong
- Factory area: 2,800+㎡
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier/factory audit status: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a disclosed factory area of more than 2,800 square meters and a workforce of more than 50 employees. This indicates that the company has a tangible operating base and a basic production organization rather than being only a minimal-scale storefront. The company is located in Guangdong, a major manufacturing region, but no additional data is provided regarding production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, workshop layout, or export markets.
The verified supplier status provides some degree of factory credibility, but the available data does not indicate large-scale production capacity. Compared with large apparel factories that typically disclose hundreds of workers, extensive production lines, or high monthly output, this supplier appears to be more appropriately categorized as a small-to-medium-sized apparel supplier.
Scoring Rationale
The company has clear physical scale indicators, including factory area and employee count, and it has verified supplier status. These factors support a stable basic production capability. However, the workforce size of 50+ staff and factory area of 2,800+㎡ do not indicate a large-scale manufacturing operation. Since there is no disclosed production capacity, equipment list, or factory certification beyond verification status, the score should not be placed in the top band. It fits best within the “medium stable factory” range, but toward the lower-middle side due to limited scale disclosure.
Final Score
15 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 17 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry labels:
- Low MOQ for customization
- Finished product inspection
- Minor customization
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility. A 17-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support also improves transaction security for buyers by providing platform-backed payment and order protection mechanisms.
The supplier also carries several operational labels, including Finished Product Inspection, Low MOQ for customization, and Minor Customization. These labels are relevant for apparel buyers who require smaller customized orders and basic inspection support. However, the provided data does not show third-party management system certifications, such as ISO certifications, social compliance audits, or specific apparel industry certifications. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, broader compliance documentation is not fully evidenced in the supplied data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier qualifies strongly in this dimension because it has a long Gold Supplier history of 17 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as verified. These are core credibility indicators on the platform. The available certification/industry labels are also relevant to customization and inspection capability. The only reason not to assign a perfect score is that the provided data does not include broader factory certifications, social compliance certifications, or detailed audit documentation beyond the verified supplier status and platform labels.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 200+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥6.7M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Number of reviews: 10+
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 200 orders over the past six months, with transaction value exceeding CN¥6.7M. This indicates active commercial performance and suggests that the supplier has recent buyer demand rather than being an inactive or untested seller.
The store rating of 4.7 is positive and reflects generally favorable buyer satisfaction. However, the review count is only listed as 10+, which is relatively limited compared with the number of reported orders. This means the available customer feedback base is not large enough to fully validate performance consistency across many buyers. The business volume is strong, but the relatively small review base creates some limitation in customer-side verification.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier’s six-month transaction value and order volume are both solid. CN¥6.7M+ in recent transactions and 200+ orders show meaningful platform activity and commercial traction. The 4.7 rating is also supportive. However, because only 10+ reviews are disclosed, the evaluation base is not sufficiently broad to justify the highest score band. The supplier is commercially validated, but not to the level of a highly reviewed, high-volume benchmark supplier.
Final Score
17 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤5 hours
- Customization-related labels:
- Low MOQ for customization
- Minor customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is listed as within five hours, which is acceptable for standard B2B communication but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. The presence of “Low MOQ for customization” and “Minor customization” indicates that the supplier can support some degree of product adaptation, especially for smaller customized orders.
However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability. The available labels only show minor customization and low MOQ customization. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to conclude that the supplier can handle complex private-label development, full pattern development, fabric engineering, or highly customized garment programs unless additional evidence is provided.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates reasonable service capability because the response time is within five hours and customization-related labels are present. This is suitable for buyers needing basic custom logo or minor product adjustments. However, the response time is not fast enough for the highest score band, and Full Customization is not evidenced. As a result, the score falls in the normal-response/basic-customization range rather than the strong-service range.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 94.3%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 94.3% is above the 90% threshold. This indicates strong delivery discipline based on the platform-reported data. For apparel procurement, on-time dispatch is important because delays can affect seasonal launches, promotional campaigns, and replenishment planning.
No additional logistics data is provided, such as average lead time, production cycle, shipping methods, or late-shipment dispute history. Therefore, the evaluation is based strictly on the reported on-time dispatch rate.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 94.3%, the supplier demonstrates reliable delivery performance. A perfect score is not assigned because the data does not include broader delivery indicators such as lead-time consistency, order complexity, or historical delay causes. Still, based on the available metric, delivery performance is clearly strong.
Final Score
9 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 10+
- Finished Product Inspection: True, based on platform label
- Verified supplier/factory status: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a store rating of 4.7, which indicates generally positive customer satisfaction. The Finished Product Inspection label is also an important quality-related indicator, suggesting that the supplier has some form of final inspection process before shipment. Verified supplier status further supports baseline credibility.
However, the number of reviews is only 10+, which limits the strength of customer feedback validation. A higher number of reviews would provide stronger evidence of consistent quality across multiple orders and buyers. In addition, the provided data does not include defect rates, return rates, inspection reports, sample approval records, or third-party quality certifications. Therefore, the quality assessment is favorable but not comprehensive.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier deserves a good score because it combines a positive store rating, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status. These factors indicate that some quality control and buyer satisfaction evidence exists. However, the relatively small review count prevents the supplier from reaching the top score band. The quality system appears adequate for standard apparel orders, but the data is not sufficient to confirm advanced or highly standardized quality management.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 15 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 19 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 17 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 7 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 9 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 16 / 20 |
| Total Score | 83 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.
Qeok (Guangdong) Clothing Culture Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking women’s apparel, shirts, low-MOQ customization, minor customization, and platform-protected sourcing through Trade Assurance. The supplier has strong platform credibility, long-term Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, solid recent transaction volume, and a strong on-time dispatch rate.
Suitable customer types include:
- Small to medium apparel brands requiring low MOQ orders
- Buyers testing customized shirt designs or logo customization
- E-commerce sellers needing flexible order quantities
- Procurement teams that prefer Trade Assurance-backed transactions
Main risk points:
- Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data
- Review count is limited at 10+, despite 200+ recent orders
- Factory scale is moderate, not large-scale
- No disclosed production capacity, machinery list, or detailed factory certification beyond platform verification
- Response time of ≤5 hours is acceptable but not highly responsive
Growth potential:
The supplier shows good potential for small-to-medium customized apparel sourcing due to low MOQ customization labels, recent transaction activity, and strong platform tenure. If the company can provide more detailed production capacity, quality inspection records, and evidence of broader customization capability, its procurement attractiveness would improve further.
Leave your comment