Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Supplier Evaluation Report: Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang-based apparel supplier in China, offering low-MOQ clothing products including hooded sweatshirts, sports suits, winter apparel, and customized streetwear-related items. Based on the provided data, the supplier appears to operate as a small-to-medium production entity, with a factory area of over 1,000㎡ and more than 40 staff. It has Gold Supplier status for 2 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. Its service indicators are relatively strong, with response time within 1 hour and Full Customization capability. Business performance shows over 100 orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value in the past six months, indicating active but not large-scale commercial validation. The main limitations are the moderate store rating of 4.3, limited review volume of 10+, and an on-time delivery rate of 85.4%, which is acceptable but not top-tier. This supplier is suitable for small to mid-sized buyers, trial orders, customized apparel sourcing, and low-MOQ procurement.
Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 1,000+㎡
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Specific factory certifications: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. has a reported factory area of over 1,000㎡ and more than 40 staff, which indicates a basic but tangible production foundation. The company is not presented as a large-scale manufacturer, but the available data suggests it has an operating factory structure rather than being only a trading intermediary. The “verified supplier” status adds some credibility to the existence and operational profile of the business. However, the data does not provide detailed production capacity, machinery count, monthly output, audit reports, or internationally recognized factory certifications.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates basic production capability with a physical factory and a moderate workforce. However, compared with larger factories that typically have extensive production lines, larger staff counts, and more detailed audit or certification documentation, this supplier’s scale remains limited. The verified supplier status supports its credibility, but the absence of detailed factory certification or production capacity data prevents a higher score. Therefore, it fits the category of a small factory with foundational production capability.
Final Score
12 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / platform labels:
- Finished product inspection
- On-time delivery 85.4%
- Response time ≤1h
- Full customization
Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements provide basic platform-backed transaction security and supplier verification. The presence of platform labels such as Finished Product Inspection, response time, delivery performance, and customization capability further improves its profile. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established suppliers with more extensive platform records.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the key platform credibility elements expected from a reliable vendor: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. These reduce procurement risk and support safer transaction handling. However, the relatively short 2-year Gold Supplier tenure limits the strength of its long-term credibility. The platform label set is useful, but the data does not provide additional third-party compliance certificates or detailed audit documentation. As a result, the supplier falls into the range of having core certification elements but a relatively short platform track record.
Final Score
16 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 4.3
- Reviews: 10+
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders and CN¥135.2K+ in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates active commercial operation and a certain level of buyer acceptance. The order count is meaningful, especially for a supplier offering low-MOQ apparel products. However, the transaction value is moderate rather than high, and the store rating of 4.3 is acceptable but not excellent. The review count of 10+ is also relatively limited, meaning the available customer feedback base is not broad enough to fully validate consistent long-term performance.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows real transaction activity, which is a positive sign for procurement consideration. More than 100 orders over six months suggests it is not inactive or untested. However, the transaction amount remains modest, and the store rating and review volume do not support a high-confidence commercial performance evaluation. The business record is sufficient for trial or moderate-volume sourcing, but it does not yet demonstrate strong market validation at a larger scale.
Final Score
13 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Response time: ≤1h
- Full Customization: Supported
- Additional communication efficiency details: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 1 hour is a strong service indicator, especially for buyers requiring fast quotation, sampling discussion, design confirmation, or order coordination. The Full Customization label is also important for apparel buyers seeking customized styles, prints, patterns, or personalized products. However, the data does not provide additional details such as multilingual communication capability, sample lead time, design support process, or account management structure.
Scoring Rationale
The combination of response time ≤1h and Full Customization support places this supplier in the highest service capability range according to the scoring criteria. Although additional service details are not available, the provided platform indicators are directly relevant to buyer communication and customization needs. The supplier appears especially suitable for buyers that value fast communication and flexible apparel customization.
Final Score
10 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 85.4%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 85.4%, which falls within the 80%–89% range. This indicates acceptable but not excellent delivery reliability. For apparel procurement, delivery consistency is important, particularly for seasonal products, promotional campaigns, and cross-border inventory planning. An 85.4% on-time rate suggests that most shipments are delivered on schedule, but there is still a measurable risk of delay.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since 85.4% is in the middle-to-upper part of this range, the supplier deserves a solid but not premium delivery score. Buyers should still confirm production lead times, shipping schedules, and order completion dates before placing larger or time-sensitive orders.
Final Score
8 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.3
- Reviews: 10+
- Finished Product Inspection: Present
- Verified supplier: True
- Detailed defect rate / return rate / third-party quality audit: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection label, which is a positive quality-control indicator. The verified supplier status also supports a basic level of credibility. However, the store rating of 4.3 is moderate rather than high, and the review count of 10+ is relatively limited. This means that while there is some buyer feedback, the available customer evaluation base is not large enough to strongly confirm stable quality performance across many orders.
Scoring Rationale
The presence of Finished Product Inspection improves the supplier’s quality assurance profile, and the store rating is still within an acceptable range. However, the limited number of reviews and the absence of detailed quality metrics restrict confidence in long-term consistency. The supplier can be considered to have a basic quality-control framework, but buyers should use samples, pre-shipment inspection, or smaller initial orders to verify product quality before scaling procurement.
Final Score
15 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 12 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 16 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 13 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 10 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 8 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 15 / 20 |
| Total Score | 74 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended for Cooperation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ apparel sourcing, customized clothing products, and flexible communication. Its strongest advantages are fast response time, Full Customization capability, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and active recent order performance.
This supplier is most appropriate for:
- Small to mid-sized apparel buyers
- Cross-border e-commerce sellers
- Buyers testing customized sweatshirts, hoodies, sportswear, or casual apparel
- Procurement teams requiring low MOQ and quick communication
Main risk points include:
- Moderate factory scale with only 1,000+㎡ and 40+ staff
- Limited review volume of 10+
- Store rating of 4.3, which is acceptable but not excellent
- On-time delivery rate of 85.4%, indicating some delivery delay risk
- Insufficient Data on detailed factory certifications, production capacity, defect rate, and third-party quality audits
Overall, the supplier has reasonable growth potential, especially in customized apparel and small-batch sourcing. For first cooperation, buyers should start with sample orders or controlled trial orders, confirm specifications clearly, and use Trade Assurance or inspection arrangements before expanding to larger-volume procurement.
Leave your comment