zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenqiguodu (Shangqiu) Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shenqiguodu (shangqiu) Clothing Co., Ltd.

Shenqiguodu (shangqiu) Clothing Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shenqiguodu (shangqiu) Clothing Co., Ltd. is a China-based clothing supplier located in Henan, with a reported factory area of over 8,000㎡ and more than 200 staff. The supplier appears to be positioned as a children’s and casual apparel manufacturer offering low-MOQ products such as children’s two-piece sets, summer clothing, training suits, sweatshirts, pants, and T-shirts. Based on the available platform data, the company has 2 years of Gold Supplier status, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. Its recent commercial activity is moderate to strong, with 300+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 90+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for small to medium buyers seeking low-MOQ apparel sourcing with reliable delivery performance. Key limitations include limited Gold Supplier history and insufficient data on formal product inspection systems or advanced customization capabilities.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Maximum Score: 20

Basis

  • Factory location: Henan, China
  • Factory area: 8,000+㎡
  • Employees: 200+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope shown: children’s clothing, casual sets, training suits, sweatshirts, pants, T-shirts
  • Factory certification details beyond supplier verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory scale of over 8,000㎡ and more than 200 employees, which indicates a meaningful production base rather than a very small workshop-style operation. The company appears focused on apparel products, especially children’s and casual clothing categories. The available product listings also show relatively low minimum order quantities, suggesting the factory may serve flexible batch production needs.

The supplier is marked as a verified supplier, which adds credibility to its operational existence and basic manufacturing capacity. However, the data does not provide detailed information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, factory audit reports, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, while the company shows solid mid-sized manufacturing characteristics, its production depth and audit maturity cannot be fully confirmed from the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s factory size and staff count support a classification as a medium-sized stable factory. The presence of supplier verification strengthens confidence in its basic operating capability. However, because there is no detailed evidence of large-scale production capacity, advanced factory audits, or formal manufacturing certifications, it should not be scored in the top range reserved for large and highly certified supply chains.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Maximum Score: 20

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Platform/industry labels:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • On-time delivery 100.0%
  • Response time ≤3h
  • Additional compliance certificates: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform trust indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification. These elements provide a basic level of transaction security and platform-backed credibility. Trade Assurance is particularly relevant for overseas procurement because it can help buyers manage payment and delivery-related risks through the platform.

However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established platform suppliers. The certification and label information is useful but not comprehensive. The available labels focus mainly on MOQ flexibility, delivery performance, and response speed, rather than formal compliance systems, product safety certifications, social compliance, or third-party quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core credibility elements expected from a legitimate platform supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. This places it above suppliers with incomplete or weak platform profiles. However, the short Gold Supplier history and lack of detailed third-party compliance documentation prevent it from reaching the highest credibility band.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Maximum Score: 20

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Number of reviews: 90+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 300 orders in the past six months, which indicates active buyer engagement and ongoing commercial transactions. The transaction value of CN¥202.8K+ shows that the supplier is not only receiving inquiries but also converting orders into measurable revenue. The product prices and low MOQs suggest that the business model may involve frequent small to medium-sized orders.

A store rating of 4.7 with over 90 reviews is a positive indicator of buyer satisfaction. The review count is meaningful enough to provide some commercial validation, though it is not exceptionally high compared with large-volume mature suppliers. The data suggests a supplier with stable transaction activity and reasonable market acceptance, but not yet at a high-volume or premium commercial performance level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid recent order activity, moderate transaction value, and a good rating base. These indicators justify a score in the stable medium-performance range. However, the transaction value is not high enough to classify the supplier as a top-performing large-volume seller, and the review count, while useful, is not extensive enough to remove all uncertainty.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Maximum Score: 10

Basis

  • Response time: ≤3h
  • Platform label: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤3 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness for online sourcing. This is suitable for buyers who need relatively quick quotation discussions, product clarification, or order coordination. The platform label “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some customization flexibility, particularly for buyers seeking smaller trial orders or customized apparel batches.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. There is also no information on design support, OEM/ODM depth, sample development speed, language capability, dedicated account service, or after-sales handling. Therefore, the supplier’s service capability can be considered functional and responsive, but not proven to be highly customized or advanced.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s ≤3-hour response time is positive, but the scoring criteria reserve the highest range for response time of ≤1 hour combined with strong customization capability. Since Full Customization is not confirmed and only “Low MOQ for customization” is available, the supplier fits the normal-to-good service capability range rather than the excellent range.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Maximum Score: 10

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
  • Platform label: On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided in the dataset. For apparel procurement, especially low-MOQ or fast-moving fashion items, on-time shipment is important because delays can directly affect selling seasons and inventory planning.

The available data does not provide additional delivery details such as average lead time, sample lead time, logistics methods, peak-season capacity, or historical dispute rate. Nevertheless, based strictly on the provided metric, delivery performance is excellent.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, suppliers with an on-time delivery rate above 90% should receive 9 to 10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it qualifies for the top delivery performance score. The absence of detailed lead-time data does not reduce the score significantly because the required delivery metric is clearly provided and very strong.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Maximum Score: 20

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 90+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Supplier verification is marked True
  • Product-specific quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.7 store rating and more than 90 reviews, indicating generally positive customer feedback. This level of review data provides some confidence that buyers have completed transactions and left measurable feedback. The supplier verification status also provides a basic level of quality and operational credibility.

However, there is insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, in-house quality control procedures, AQL standards, fabric testing, garment inspection processes, or third-party quality certifications. For apparel sourcing, these missing details are important, especially for buyers with strict quality consistency requirements, children’s clothing standards, or export compliance needs. As a result, quality confidence is supported by customer feedback and verification, but the supplier’s formal quality assurance structure is not fully evidenced.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a good score due to its 4.7 rating, 90+ reviews, and verified supplier status. These indicators suggest acceptable market feedback and basic quality reliability. However, the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality control documentation prevents it from reaching the highest score range for suppliers with comprehensive quality assurance systems.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for trial orders and small-to-medium apparel sourcing.

Shenqiguodu (shangqiu) Clothing Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking children’s apparel and casual clothing products with low MOQ requirements, moderate pricing, and reliable delivery performance. Its 8,000+㎡ factory area, 200+ staff, verified supplier status, 300+ recent orders, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate indicate a stable mid-sized supplier with active platform operations.

Suitable customer types include:
- Small to medium apparel retailers
- E-commerce sellers testing children’s clothing or casualwear categories
- Buyers requiring low MOQ sourcing
- Importers seeking suppliers with Trade Assurance support
- Customers prioritizing delivery reliability and platform transaction protection

Main risks:
- Gold Supplier history is only 2 years
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- Finished Product Inspection information is unavailable
- Detailed factory audit, production capacity, and quality certification data are insufficient
- Product compliance data for children’s clothing is not provided

Growth potential:
The supplier shows positive growth potential due to active recent orders, good customer rating, low-MOQ flexibility, and strong delivery performance. If the supplier can provide stronger documentation on quality control, inspection procedures, customization capability, and compliance certifications, it could become a more reliable long-term sourcing partner for larger or more quality-sensitive buyers.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shangqiu Muchu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Muchu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Yinzhijian Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Yinzhijian Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shangqiu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shangqiu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Yinzhijian Biotechnology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Yinzhijian Biotechnology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Jingcheng Measuring Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Jingcheng Measuring Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Mingsen Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Mingsen Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Hk Flowers Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hk Flowers Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Menglu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Menglu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Woao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Woao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Haiyun Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Haiyun Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mofei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mofei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ouze Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ouze Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Kerousi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Kerousi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kanoshi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kanoshi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Olansi Healthcare Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Olansi Healthcare Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Lanbao Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Lanbao Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Hyrt International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Hyrt International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhimei Shiji Industrial Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhimei Shiji Industrial Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi East Ai Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi East Ai Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mingze Rubber & Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mingze Rubber & Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Daier Electron Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Daier Electron Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Longyanxing Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Longyanxing Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Ruichi Hardware Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Ruichi Hardware Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Weirui Textile Thread Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Weirui Textile Thread Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Rongheyuan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Rongheyuan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Dingxun Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Dingxun Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kingjoy Forge Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Kingjoy Forge Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Binjin (Tianjin) New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Binjin (Tianjin) New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Denorgin Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Denorgin Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Maxplus Machinery (Qingdao) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Maxplus Machinery (Qingdao) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sophon Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sophon Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Funuote New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Funuote New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yu. Pooling Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yu. Pooling Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Yuling Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Yuling Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026