zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Wuhan Kerousi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Wuhan Kerousi Clothing Co., Ltd. is a China-based apparel supplier located in Hubei, with a reported factory area of 1,000+㎡ and 50+ staff. The company is marked as a verified supplier and operates on as a 2-year Gold Supplier with Trade Assurance support. Its listed products are women’s apparel items such as shirts, blazers, formal V-neck styles, plus-size sets, and long-sleeve shirts, generally with low MOQs of 2 pieces or 2 sets.

The supplier demonstrates a moderate level of commercial activity, with 100+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value over the past six months. Its store rating is 4.6 based on 30+ reviews, indicating acceptable but not yet deeply validated customer feedback. The supplier is suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking women’s apparel with low MOQ, customization options, and platform-protected transactions. Key limitations include relatively small disclosed factory scale and limited review volume.

Wuhan Kerousi Clothing Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company: Wuhan Kerousi Clothing Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Hubei, China
  • Factory area: 1,000+㎡
  • Employees: 50+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The company has disclosed basic manufacturing capacity indicators, including factory size and employee count. A 1,000+㎡ facility with 50+ staff suggests a small to lower-medium scale production setup rather than a large industrial manufacturing base. The presence of supplier verification improves credibility, as it indicates that some level of factory or supplier information has been checked through the platform.

However, the available data does not include detailed production lines, monthly output, equipment quantity, in-house quality control team size, export history, or major client references. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have a functioning production base, its large-scale manufacturing stability cannot be fully confirmed from the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has clear evidence of basic production capability through its factory area, staff size, and verified supplier status. Nevertheless, the scale is not large, and the disclosed operational capacity is limited. Compared with large-scale stable supply chains, the company appears more suitable for smaller or moderate-volume apparel sourcing needs. The verified supplier status supports confidence, but the lack of deeper production capacity data prevents a higher score.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier tenure: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / industry labels:
  • Finished product inspection
  • Minor customization
  • ODM service available
  • Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. It is a Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance, which provides buyers with an additional layer of transaction protection on . The company also displays operational capability tags such as Finished Product Inspection, Minor Customization, ODM Service Available, and Full Customization.

The Gold Supplier tenure is 2 years, which indicates a platform presence but not a long-established record. The available data does not mention third-party management system certifications such as ISO, BSCI, OEKO-TEX, GRS, or other apparel-related compliance certifications. Therefore, platform credibility is reasonably solid, but broader compliance depth is not sufficiently evidenced.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core trust indicators: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and multiple capability labels. These support a credible online sourcing profile. However, the Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 2 years, and no independent compliance certifications are provided. This places the supplier in the category of having core platform credibility but not a fully mature or long-term compliance profile.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥405.6K+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Review count: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved 100+ orders over the past six months, which indicates active commercial operations on the platform. The reported transaction value of CN¥405.6K+ shows a meaningful but not exceptionally large sales volume. A 4.6 store rating suggests generally positive buyer satisfaction, though it is not at the highest performance level.

The review count of 30+ provides some market validation, but the sample size remains relatively limited. The data supports the conclusion that the supplier has real transaction activity, but it does not yet demonstrate very high-volume or highly mature commercial performance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable medium-level business activity. The order volume and transaction amount are sufficient to prove marketplace activity and buyer acceptance. However, the review base is not large, and the 4.6 rating, while acceptable, is not outstanding. This supports a mid-range score rather than a high-performance rating.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • Minor Customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates relatively efficient communication. While it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour, it is still within a practical range for normal sourcing communication. The presence of Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service labels suggests that the supplier can support product adaptation and design-related service requirements.

The provided data does not include details about design team size, sampling lead time, language capability, after-sales service process, or dedicated account management. Therefore, the service capability appears solid from a platform-label perspective, but deeper service execution capability cannot be fully verified.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in terms of customization availability and maintains a response time that is acceptable for business communication. Because the response time is not ≤1 hour, it does not qualify for the highest score range. However, the combination of Full Customization and ODM availability gives the supplier stronger flexibility than basic trading-only suppliers.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 90.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 90.7%, which exceeds the 90% threshold. This indicates that the supplier has a generally reliable delivery record according to the available platform data. For apparel procurement, on-time shipment is important because delays can affect seasonal selling windows, promotional launches, and inventory planning.

The data does not provide average production lead time, shipping methods, delay reasons, or performance by order size. Therefore, the score is based strictly on the disclosed on-time shipment rate.

Scoring Rationale

An on-time delivery rate above 90% places the supplier in the strongest delivery performance range under the given evaluation criteria. However, as the rate is only slightly above 90%, it is appropriate to assign a strong but not perfect score.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Review count: 30+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.6, supported by 30+ reviews. This indicates generally favorable customer feedback, though the review count is not large enough to represent broad market validation. The Finished Product Inspection label is a positive quality assurance indicator, suggesting that inspection is part of the supplier’s listed service or operational capability.

The verified supplier status also adds credibility to the quality assessment framework. However, the provided data does not include defect rates, inspection reports, return rates, fabric testing records, quality management certifications, or customer complaint details. Therefore, the quality profile appears acceptable but not fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating, some customer feedback, Finished Product Inspection, and supplier verification. These factors support a solid quality foundation. However, the review volume is modest, and the rating is good rather than excellent. The absence of detailed quality control documentation limits the score from reaching the top range.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for small to mid-sized apparel buyers.

Wuhan Kerousi Clothing Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking women’s apparel products with low MOQ requirements, platform-protected transactions, and customization options. The supplier’s strengths include Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM availability, and a 90.7% on-time delivery rate.

The main risks are the relatively limited factory scale, short 2-year Gold Supplier history, modest review count of 30+, and lack of detailed production capacity or third-party compliance certification data. Buyers should consider starting with small trial orders, confirming product specifications clearly, and using Trade Assurance for transaction protection.

The supplier shows growth potential due to its active transaction record, customization capability, and acceptable delivery performance, but it is not yet strongly validated as a large-scale or premium compliance-driven manufacturer.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Wuhan Jingchen Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jingchen Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Flag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Flag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Yeestep Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Yeestep Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengli Automobile (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengli Automobile (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Bestand Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Bestand Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Waco Design Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Waco Design Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Xinqidian Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Xinqidian Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinguang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinguang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinteng Manufacturing & Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jinteng Manufacturing & Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Squirrel Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Squirrel Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Yijue Tengda Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Yijue Tengda Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Yinhai Welding Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Yinhai Welding Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Torch Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Torch Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Water World Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Water World Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jiutouniao Medical Instrumts Endevelopment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jiutouniao Medical Instrumts Endevelopment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Willita Ink Jet Technology (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Willita Ink Jet Technology (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Hk Flowers Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hk Flowers Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Shengping Minerals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Shengping Minerals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Hongyu Silicone Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongyu Silicone Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Shenlong Rope Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Shenlong Rope Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaihongyu Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaihongyu Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Renqiu Tuoxin Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Renqiu Tuoxin Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Shaxi Bon Yip Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Shaxi Bon Yip Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tcang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tcang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhengqi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhengqi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Koodsun Technology  Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Koodsun Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Keqirui Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Keqirui Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shengjie Car Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shengjie Car Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Genuine Marine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Genuine Marine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingnati Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingnati Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ronde Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ronde Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tianlang Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tianlang Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Linzhen Environment Project Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Linzhen Environment Project Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qituo Lubrication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qituo Lubrication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fd Seals Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fd Seals Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yabo Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yabo Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Semlamp Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Semlamp Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Deco Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Deco Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026