zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Anhui Funuote New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Anhui Funuote New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, offering WPC composite outdoor sliding gates and garden fence-related products with low MOQ requirements of 2 sets. The company shows a verified supplier profile, a 5-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including finished product inspection, ODM service availability, and low MOQ customization. Its production base is moderate in physical size at 5,400+ m², but the reported workforce of 20+ staff indicates a relatively small operational team. Business activity is present, with 40+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value over the past six months, although customer feedback is limited, with a 3.7 store rating and only 10 reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume WPC outdoor gate or fence products with customization flexibility, but quality confidence should be managed through sampling, inspection, and clear order specifications.

Anhui Funuote New Materials Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Anhui, China
- Factory area: 5,400+ m²
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined factory presence with 5,400+ m² of reported operating space, which indicates a tangible production facility rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. However, the workforce size of 20+ staff suggests a relatively lean operation. This scale can support basic production and customized orders, but it does not indicate a large-scale manufacturing organization.

Scoring Rationale
The verified supplier status improves credibility and confirms a degree of factory-level validation. However, the limited staff count places the company closer to a small manufacturing operation with basic production capability rather than a large or highly scaled supply chain. The factory area is reasonable, but employee scale limits the strength score.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: Verified supplier
- Certification / industry labels: Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection, ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a relatively complete platform credibility profile. A 5-year Gold Supplier history provides a meaningful track record on the platform, while Trade Assurance gives buyers additional transaction protection. The presence of finished product inspection and ODM service labels further strengthens the supplier’s compliance and service positioning.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of 5-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple platform labels supports a strong credibility assessment. The available data does not show external certifications beyond platform-related labels, so the score remains strong but not at the absolute maximum.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 40+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥676.1K+
- Store rating: 3.7
- Review count: 10

Elaboration
The supplier has visible transaction activity, with more than 40 orders and over CN¥676.1K in transaction value in the past six months. This indicates some level of market acceptance and commercial activity. However, the store rating of 3.7 is moderate, and the review count of 10 is limited, reducing the strength of buyer-side validation.

Scoring Rationale
The order volume and transaction amount show that the supplier is commercially active, but the relatively low review base and moderate store rating prevent classification as a high-performance supplier. The business profile is more consistent with a supplier that has stable but not highly proven transaction performance.

Final Score
13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Customization-related labels: Low MOQ for customization, ODM service available
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. The available labels show support for low MOQ customization and ODM service, which suggests some customization capability. However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization support.

Scoring Rationale
Because the response time is above the ≤1 hour threshold for the highest service tier but still reasonably fast, and because customization capability is supported by platform labels but not fully confirmed as Full Customization, the supplier fits the normal-to-good service capability range.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 95.5%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 95.5% on-time dispatch rate, which is above the 90% threshold for strong delivery performance. This indicates reliable fulfillment behavior based on the provided platform data.

Scoring Rationale
Since the on-time dispatch rate exceeds 90%, the supplier qualifies for the highest scoring band in this dimension. The score is strong, although buyers should still confirm lead times and delivery terms per order.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 3.7
- Review count: 10
- Finished product inspection: Present
- Factory verification / verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection and verified supplier status. These are positive signs for quality control structure. However, customer feedback is limited, with only 10 reviews, and the store rating of 3.7 is not high. This creates uncertainty around consistent buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
The presence of finished product inspection and factory verification supports a basic quality assurance framework. However, the limited review count and moderate rating prevent a high quality-feedback score. The available data suggests acceptable but not strongly validated quality performance.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

73 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-to-medium buyers seeking WPC composite outdoor gates, sliding gate products, or garden fence-related solutions with low MOQ and ODM/customization flexibility. The supplier is suitable for buyers who value platform protection, Trade Assurance, moderate customization, and reliable dispatch performance.

Key risks include the small reported workforce, limited customer review base, and moderate store rating of 3.7. These factors mean buyers should not rely solely on platform indicators for quality assurance. Before placing larger orders, procurement teams should request samples, confirm technical specifications, define inspection standards, and use Trade Assurance where possible.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its 5-year Gold Supplier status, verified profile, finished product inspection label, and recent transaction activity. However, stronger customer feedback and higher review volume would be needed to support large-scale procurement confidence.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui He He New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui He He New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Benming New Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Benming New Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Yixin Decorative Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Yixin Decorative Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Newsense New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Newsense New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Linktor New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Linktor New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Flyfish New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Flyfish New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Ims New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Ims New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Jinbo New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Jinbo New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Yuqiansheng New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Yuqiansheng New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xutuo New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xutuo New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Tengyue New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Tengyue New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Enon New Materials Technology Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Enon New Materials Technology Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xinjiyuan New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xinjiyuan New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xionglin New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xionglin New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jinhua New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jinhua New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Taozhou New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Taozhou New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao East Power Industry Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao East Power Industry Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Anping County Comesh Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Comesh Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yichi Sealing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yichi Sealing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai Jiufeng Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai Jiufeng Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Anda Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Anda Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Shuoyuan Agricultural Water Conservation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Shuoyuan Agricultural Water Conservation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Macon New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Macon New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wei Xin Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wei Xin Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zoan Gaoke Eelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zoan Gaoke Eelectronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hualiruitong Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hualiruitong Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing City Kahn Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing City Kahn Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinnanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinnanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Reginfield Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Reginfield Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Warhorse Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Warhorse Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Haoran Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Haoran Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Wenzhe Valve Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Wenzhe Valve Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen City Shenwei Gold Thread Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen City Shenwei Gold Thread Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Jinaolei Fitness Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Jinaolei Fitness Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Winner Dtf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Winner Dtf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Minhui Luminous Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Minhui Luminous Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningjin Bingchuan Muffler Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningjin Bingchuan Muffler Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026