Shenzhen Flyfish New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Flyfish New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 11,000+ sqm and 60+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a mid-sized manufacturing supplier focused on epoxy resin, epoxy floor kits, casting materials, and related accessory-based resin products. Its platform profile shows 2 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, a 97.3% on-time delivery rate, and response time within 4 hours. Commercial activity is relatively solid, with 50+ orders and CN¥5.9M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 20+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking medium-scale procurement, trial orders, or resin-related product sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection. Key limitations include limited review volume, no provided evidence of Full Customization capability, and Insufficient Data regarding Finished Product Inspection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 11,000+ sqm
• Employees: 60+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported production site of more than 11,000 square meters and over 60 employees, indicating a meaningful physical manufacturing base rather than a very small trading operation. The factory size suggests the company may have space for production, storage, and operational handling of resin-related products. The employee count is moderate, supporting basic production and order fulfillment capacity, but it does not indicate a large-scale industrial workforce.

The verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of the company’s operational existence and factory profile. However, the provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly production capacity, equipment lists, R&D team size, or third-party factory audit reports beyond the verification indicator.

Scoring Rationale

The company fits the profile of a mid-sized stable factory. Its 11,000+ sqm facility is a positive indicator, and 60+ staff gives it a reasonable operational foundation. However, it does not reach the level of a large-scale supply chain player because the employee base and production capacity details are limited. The verified supplier status supports confidence, but the lack of detailed capacity metrics prevents a higher score.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / platform labels provided: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 97.3%”

Elaboration

The supplier has several core credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification. These are important for procurement risk control because they provide buyers with a basic level of platform-backed visibility and transaction protection.

However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established platform suppliers. The listed labels are operational performance indicators rather than formal product or management system certifications. No ISO certification, product compliance certification, environmental certification, or industry-specific certificate is provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a credible platform foundation through Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. This supports a positive compliance and platform trust score. The score is not higher because the Gold Supplier tenure is still short and the data does not provide formal certification details beyond platform indicators.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 50+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥5.9M+
• Store rating: 4.7
• Review count: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier shows measurable recent commercial activity. More than 50 orders in six months indicates ongoing buyer engagement, while CN¥5.9M+ in transaction value suggests a meaningful transaction scale for its product category. The 4.7 store rating is positive and indicates generally favorable buyer feedback.

At the same time, the review count of 20+ is not very high. This means the available public feedback base is still relatively limited compared with suppliers that have hundreds or thousands of reviews. The order and transaction data support commercial reliability, but the limited review volume reduces the depth of third-party buyer validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs above a basic commercial validation level, especially due to the CN¥5.9M+ transaction value and 50+ recent orders. The 4.7 rating is favorable, but the relatively small review base limits confidence in long-term consistency across many customers. Therefore, the supplier is best classified as having stable medium-scale business performance rather than top-tier high-volume validation.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The provided response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing. This level of responsiveness is suitable for routine inquiries, quotation discussions, and order follow-up. It is not as strong as suppliers with response time within 1 hour, but it remains commercially workable.

There is no provided data confirming Full Customization capability, design support, formulation adjustment, OEM/ODM service, packaging customization, or technical application support. Therefore, customization strength cannot be confirmed from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives a moderate service score because response speed is reasonable and supports normal procurement communication. However, the absence of confirmed Full Customization capability prevents a high score. For buyers requiring customized resin formulas, private labeling, packaging development, or technical adaptation, further confirmation would be required before placing larger orders.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 97.3%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 97.3% is a strong operational indicator. It exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest delivery performance scoring band. For procurement teams, this suggests that the supplier has demonstrated reliable shipment execution on the platform.

The provided data does not include average lead time, logistics methods, peak-season performance, export documentation capability, or late delivery dispute records. Therefore, the evaluation is based only on the stated on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

A 97.3% on-time delivery rate supports a high score because it indicates strong fulfillment discipline and reliable shipment timing. Although additional logistics data would improve the assessment, the available metric is clearly positive and falls within the top scoring range.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.7
• Review count: 20+
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, which suggests generally satisfactory buyer feedback. The verified supplier status and factory verification provide some support for quality credibility because they indicate that the supplier’s operational profile has undergone a form of platform verification.

However, the review count is only 20+, which limits the statistical strength of the feedback base. More importantly, the data does not confirm whether the supplier provides Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control reports, batch testing, inspection photos, third-party inspection acceptance, or product compliance documentation. For chemical or resin-related products, quality consistency can be especially important, but no detailed quality assurance system is provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating and verified factory status, which support a solid quality score. However, the limited number of reviews and Insufficient Data regarding Finished Product Inspection prevent a higher rating. The supplier appears acceptable for standard procurement, but larger or technically sensitive orders should require pre-shipment inspection, sample testing, and written quality specifications.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Shenzhen Flyfish New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing epoxy resin, resin casting materials, epoxy floor kits, and related resin products at small to medium procurement scale.

The supplier is suitable for: - Buyers requiring Trade Assurance protection. - Importers or distributors seeking medium-scale resin-related product sourcing. - Customers starting with trial orders or moderate-volume repeat purchases. - Buyers who prioritize reliable delivery performance, as the on-time delivery rate is 97.3%.

Main risk points: - Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, so long-term platform track record is still limited. - Review count is 20+, which is positive but not large enough for broad customer validation. - Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data. - Finished Product Inspection capability is Insufficient Data. - No formal product certifications or management system certifications are provided in the data.

Growth potential: The supplier has a solid operating base, verified status, measurable recent transaction volume, and strong delivery performance. If it can provide clearer quality control documentation, inspection procedures, customization capabilities, and additional certifications, it could become more suitable for larger or more quality-sensitive procurement programs. For now, the recommended approach is to begin with sample validation or a controlled trial order before scaling purchasing volume.