zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Sichuan Newsense New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Sichuan Newsense New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Sichuan, with a reported factory area of 34,000+ m² and 140+ staff. The supplier shows solid manufacturing fundamentals, supported by verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 3 years, Trade Assurance availability, and platform labels including warranty availability, low MOQ for customization, and finished product inspection. Its listed product portfolio includes customized cloth-related items and disposable/take-away food packaging products, with MOQs ranging from 1,000 pieces to 5,000 pieces/boxes. Commercial performance is relatively strong, with 300+ orders and CN¥3.1M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating and 50+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong at 96.8% on-time shipment. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-to-large scale production capability, stable platform-backed sourcing, and moderate customization options. However, data is insufficient regarding specific factory certifications, product compliance certifications, and full customization capability.

Sichuan Newsense New Materials Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Sichuan, China
  • Factory area: 34,000+ m²
  • Employees: 140+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a meaningful physical production base, with a factory area exceeding 34,000 m². This indicates a comparatively strong manufacturing footprint and suggests the supplier is not a small trading-only operation based on the provided data. The employee count of 140+ staff reflects a mid-sized operational team, capable of supporting regular production, order handling, and basic manufacturing management. The verified supplier status further strengthens confidence in the existence and operational credibility of the company.

Scoring Rationale

The company has clear production infrastructure and verified supplier status, which supports a stable supply-chain profile. However, while the factory area is relatively large, the employee scale of 140+ staff is more consistent with a medium-sized manufacturer rather than a very large industrial supplier. No additional details are provided on production lines, annual capacity, equipment scale, or factory management certifications, so the score should not reach the highest band.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Gold Supplier status confirms paid platform participation, while the 3-year duration indicates some continuity but not a long-established platform history. Trade Assurance provides transaction protection for buyers, which is an important procurement risk-control mechanism. The verified supplier status and listed inspection-related label add further credibility. The presence of “Finished product inspection” is particularly relevant for buyers concerned with outgoing quality control.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 3 years, which is respectable but not long enough to be considered a long-term, highly mature platform track record. Also, the data does not provide detailed third-party audit reports, factory certification names, or internationally recognized compliance certifications. Therefore, the supplier fits the upper-middle credibility range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥3.1M+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 50+

Elaboration

The supplier shows active recent commercial performance, with more than 300 orders and over CN¥3.1M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has market activity and is not an inactive or unproven vendor. The store rating of 4.6 is positive, though not at the very highest level. The review count of 50+ provides some customer feedback base, but it is not large enough to represent broad-scale market validation.

Scoring Rationale

The six-month order volume and transaction value are strong, supporting confidence in the supplier’s ability to handle recurring buyer demand. However, the 4.6 rating, while good, leaves some room for caution compared with suppliers rated closer to 4.8–5.0. The review count is also moderate rather than extensive. Based on the combination of strong transaction activity and acceptable but not outstanding feedback volume, the supplier qualifies as a stable commercial performer.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤4h
  • Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier reports a response time of within 4 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing. The platform label “Low MOQ for customization” suggests that the supplier can support some level of customization with relatively accessible minimum order quantities. However, the data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization,” nor does it provide details about design support, OEM/ODM capability, sampling process, artwork handling, packaging customization workflow, or technical consultation capacity.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates normal service responsiveness and some customization flexibility. However, the response time is not within the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour, and full customization capability is not directly confirmed in the provided data. Therefore, the service capability is suitable for standard procurement and basic customization needs, but there is insufficient evidence to rate it as a highly responsive, advanced customization supplier.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time shipment rate: 96.8%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time shipment rate of 96.8% is a strong delivery indicator. It exceeds the 90% threshold required for the highest scoring band. For buyers, this suggests the supplier has a relatively reliable order fulfillment process and can support time-sensitive procurement more effectively than suppliers with lower delivery consistency.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the provided delivery data, the supplier performs very well. A 96.8% on-time shipment rate indicates strong execution discipline and reduces the risk of frequent shipment delays. Since the available data does not include average lead time, peak-season performance, or historical delay reasons, the score is based only on the on-time shipment rate. Under the stated criteria, this performance falls clearly into the 9–10 point range.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 50+
  • Finished product inspection: Listed
  • Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a good store rating of 4.6 and more than 50 reviews, providing a moderate level of customer feedback. The finished product inspection label is a positive quality-control indicator, suggesting that outgoing goods may be checked before shipment. Verified supplier status also supports a basic level of supplier credibility. However, the data does not provide detailed quality certifications, inspection standards, defect rates, product test reports, or industry-specific compliance documents.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of a good rating, moderate review base, finished product inspection, and verified supplier status supports a favorable quality assessment. Nevertheless, the rating is not exceptionally high, and the review volume is not large enough to classify the supplier as having extensive customer validation. In addition, quality system details remain limited. Therefore, the supplier fits the “good with basic quality assurance” category rather than the top tier.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 17 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 17 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total Score 85 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with standard supplier qualification checks before bulk orders.

Sichuan Newsense New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking a verified China-based supplier with solid factory scale, active recent transaction history, Trade Assurance support, and strong on-time shipment performance. The supplier is especially appropriate for buyers requiring moderate-volume purchasing, low-MOQ customization, and platform-protected transactions.

Suitable customer types:
- Importers looking for verified suppliers
- Buyers requiring stable mid-to-large production capacity
- Brands or distributors seeking basic customization with low MOQ options
- Procurement teams prioritizing delivery reliability and platform transaction protection

Main risks:
- Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data
- Specific product compliance certifications are Insufficient Data
- Detailed factory certifications, production capacity, and quality system documentation are Insufficient Data
- Store rating and review count are positive but not strong enough to indicate top-tier customer validation

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good potential due to its factory scale, 300+ recent orders, CN¥3.1M+ six-month transaction value, verified status, and 96.8% on-time shipment rate. If the supplier can provide stronger certification documentation, clearer customization capability, and more detailed quality-control evidence, it could become a stronger candidate for higher-volume or more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shijiazhuang Linktor New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Linktor New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Flyfish New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Flyfish New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Ims New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Ims New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Jinbo New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Jinbo New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Yuqiansheng New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Yuqiansheng New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xutuo New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xutuo New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Tengyue New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Tengyue New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Enon New Materials Technology Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Enon New Materials Technology Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xinjiyuan New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xinjiyuan New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xionglin New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xionglin New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jinhua New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jinhua New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Taozhou New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Taozhou New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jinshi New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jinshi New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiangfeng New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiangfeng New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Dorian New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Dorian New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tuolang New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tuolang New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jajahouse New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jajahouse New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Funuote New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Funuote New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Umore Film Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Umore Film Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Jurong Rongguang Craft Ornament Factory Supplier Evaluation
Jurong Rongguang Craft Ornament Factory Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Designeroon Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Designeroon Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Changkun Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Changkun Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yusheng Food Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yusheng Food Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Unisec Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Unisec Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Bcom Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Bcom Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bidisco Electric Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bidisco Electric Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Henan Ruimei Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Ruimei Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jinyazhiguan Hatting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jinyazhiguan Hatting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yongguan Adhesive Products Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yongguan Adhesive Products Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dabai Electric Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dabai Electric Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Action Intelligent Equipment (Shenyang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Action Intelligent Equipment (Shenyang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hanse Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hanse Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinhuangdao Ocean Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinhuangdao Ocean Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Shangshi Aerospace Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Shangshi Aerospace Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Xin Silk Road Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Xin Silk Road Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Jade Outdoor Power Equipment Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Jade Outdoor Power Equipment Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Honggang Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Honggang Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Shanghua Fluoro Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Shanghua Fluoro Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Noyafa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Noyafa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026