Jiangsu Tengyue New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Jiangsu Tengyue New Materials Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Jiangsu Tengyue New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, offering nylon-related materials including PA6, PA66, glass fiber reinforced nylon, transparent nylon PA6, and virgin PA6 products. Based on the provided data, the company has a moderate production foundation, with a reported factory area of over 9,800㎡ and more than 50 staff, supported by verified supplier status. The supplier has basic platform credibility, including Gold Supplier status for 1 year, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, and Full Customization capability. However, its commercial performance is weakly validated, with only 1 order and CN¥2K+ transaction value in the past six months, no customer reviews, and no available store rating. The reported on-time dispatch rate is 0.0%, which is a significant delivery risk. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking sample testing, small trial orders, or early-stage supplier development, but caution is required for large-volume or time-sensitive procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Jiangsu, China
• Factory area: 9,800+㎡
• Employees: 50+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope includes PA6, PA66, glass fiber reinforced nylon, transparent nylon PA6, and virgin PA6 products.

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a moderate physical production base with a factory area exceeding 9,800㎡ and a workforce of more than 50 employees. This indicates that the company is not a very small trading-only operation based on the available information, and it appears to have a basic manufacturing or supply operation for nylon-based materials. The presence of verified supplier status further supports the company’s operational legitimacy at a platform level.

However, the provided data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, key equipment, R&D team size, export scale, or detailed factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company shows a reasonable industrial foundation, the available information is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale or highly mature supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale

A factory area of 9,800+㎡ and 50+ staff suggest a small-to-medium manufacturing supplier with basic operational capacity. Verified supplier status adds credibility, but the absence of detailed production capacity and factory certification data limits the score. The company appears stronger than a minimal-capacity supplier but does not yet meet the standard of a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verification status: Verified supplier
• Certification / industry labels:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance provide a basic level of transaction protection and platform-based trust. Verified supplier status also supports the reliability of the company’s business identity and operational presence.

The certification and service labels are relatively complete for a platform profile, especially with Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, warranty availability, and full customization. These labels indicate that the supplier has presented certain compliance and service capabilities on the platform.

However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which means the supplier has limited long-term platform track record. No external quality management certifications, such as ISO-related certifications, were provided in the data. Therefore, platform credibility is acceptable but not yet mature.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core trust elements, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and several useful service/inspection labels. The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier duration of only 1 year and the absence of additional documented third-party certifications. This supports a mid-level compliance credibility score rather than a high-confidence rating.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 1
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2K+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier’s recent business activity on the platform is very limited. Only 1 order was recorded over the past six months, with a transaction value of CN¥2K+. This suggests that the supplier has not yet built a strong transaction record on the platform or that its online sales performance is still at an early stage.

The absence of a store rating and the lack of customer reviews make it difficult to validate buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing, or transaction consistency. For procurement teams, this creates uncertainty regarding actual market acceptance, order fulfillment consistency, and commercial reliability.

Scoring Rationale

Business performance is one of the weakest areas for this supplier. A single order and low transaction value over six months provide limited commercial validation. With no reviews and no available store rating, there is insufficient evidence of stable buyer demand or customer satisfaction. The supplier should therefore be considered commercially under-validated on the platform.

Final Score

8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Full customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours indicates an acceptable communication speed for online sourcing. It does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour, but it remains within a reasonable range for general procurement inquiries.

The availability of Full Customization and ODM service is a positive factor, especially for buyers requiring material adaptation, branded requirements, or customized nylon material specifications. However, the provided data does not include examples of customized projects, technical support structure, sample lead time, engineering capability, or customization success cases.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates reasonable service capability due to acceptable response speed and declared customization support. However, response time is not at the highest level, and there is insufficient data to verify the depth of its technical customization capability. A solid but not top-tier score is therefore appropriate.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 0.0%

Elaboration

The reported on-time dispatch rate is 0.0%, which is a major concern from a procurement risk perspective. Delivery reliability is especially important for raw material buyers, production planners, and manufacturers that rely on consistent supply schedules.

The data does not clarify whether the 0.0% rate is caused by insufficient transaction volume, incomplete platform logistics tracking, delayed dispatches, or another operational reason. However, the scoring must be based strictly on the provided figure. Therefore, this supplier’s delivery performance must be treated as weak until further shipment records or verified delivery history are provided.

Scoring Rationale

According to the required scoring rule, an on-time dispatch rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 0.0%, delivery performance represents a significant operational risk. Even though limited order volume may affect the reliability of this metric, the available data does not support a higher score.

Final Score

2 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has some quality-related platform indicators, including Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These are positive signs because they suggest that the supplier has presented basic quality assurance mechanisms on the platform.

However, the lack of customer reviews and absence of a store rating significantly limit the ability to assess actual customer satisfaction. There is no provided data on product defect rates, inspection reports, quality certifications, complaint handling, or repeat buyer performance. As a result, quality assurance exists at a basic platform-label level, but customer-validated quality performance remains insufficiently proven.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves some credit for Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. However, without reviews, store rating, or documented customer feedback, quality performance cannot be strongly validated. This results in a moderate-to-low score, reflecting basic quality structure but weak market feedback evidence.

Final Score

11 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended for trial orders only.

Jiangsu Tengyue New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. shows a reasonable basic supply foundation, with a 9,800+㎡ factory area, 50+ staff, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance, and platform labels such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, and Full Customization. These factors make the supplier potentially suitable for buyers seeking nylon PA6, PA66, or glass fiber reinforced nylon materials at the sample testing or small-batch sourcing stage.

However, the supplier is not yet strongly validated from a commercial or delivery perspective. The main risks are:

1. Very limited transaction record: only 1 order and CN¥2K+ transaction value in the past six months.
2. No customer feedback: 0 reviews and no available store rating.
3. Weak delivery indicator: on-time dispatch rate is reported as 0.0%.
4. Insufficient quality performance evidence: Finished Product Inspection is available, but no customer rating, defect data, or quality certification details are provided.

This supplier is more suitable for small-volume buyers, sample evaluators, material testing projects, and buyers willing to conduct supplier development. It is not currently recommended as a primary supplier for large-scale, urgent, or delivery-critical procurement until additional verification is completed, including sample testing, delivery trial, quality document review, and clarification of the 0.0% on-time dispatch rate.

Growth potential exists due to its physical factory base, customization labels, and platform compliance foundation, but stronger transaction history, customer feedback, and delivery performance are required before it can be considered a stable strategic supplier.