Shenzhen Ai Si Yun Anti-Counterfeiting Technology Development Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Ai Si Yun Anti-Counterfeiting Technology Development Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, focused on customized PVC cards, holographic laminates, smart card overlays, membership PVC cards, NFC/IC card-related products, and related anti-counterfeiting card solutions. Based on the provided data, the supplier demonstrates solid manufacturing capacity with a reported factory area of 43,000+㎡, 100+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 11 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and multiple customization-related capability tags. Commercial performance appears stable, with 70+ orders and CN¥1.5M+ transaction value over the past six months, though the review count is limited at only 5 reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 97.5% on-time dispatch rate. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking customized card and holographic card-related products with moderate-to-large order needs, but quality validation should be strengthened through samples, inspection requirements, and clear specifications before bulk procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 43,000+㎡
• Employees: 100+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a sizeable production facility of over 43,000㎡, which indicates a relatively strong physical manufacturing base compared with small workshop-style suppliers. The employee count of 100+ staff suggests an organized production structure with the ability to support customized card-related manufacturing, although the labor scale is not extremely large. The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the declared company and factory information.

The available data supports the conclusion that the supplier has a stable production foundation. However, no detailed information is provided regarding production lines, monthly output capacity, machinery, internal production processes, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company appears to have strong infrastructure, its actual production scale cannot be fully quantified beyond the stated area and staffing level.

Scoring Rationale

The large factory area and verified supplier status justify a high score in company strength. The 100+ employee count indicates a functional manufacturing organization, though it is not enough to classify the company as a very large-scale labor-intensive producer. Since detailed production capacity and audit documentation are not provided, the score should remain slightly below the highest range. Overall, the supplier fits the profile of a medium-to-large stable factory with credible operational presence.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Warranty available
• 3D design capabilities
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 11 years, which is a strong indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance availability provides additional transactional protection for buyers using ’s platform. The verified supplier status further supports the reliability of the supplier’s profile information.

The certification and industry tags are mainly service and customization-related rather than formal quality or industry certifications. The tags indicate capabilities such as customization support, warranty availability, and 3D design capability, but the provided data does not include ISO certification, product compliance certificates, environmental certifications, or sector-specific compliance documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs strongly in platform credibility due to its long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These factors provide a meaningful level of confidence for buyers, especially for initial sourcing and online trade. However, because the data does not show formal third-party product or management system certifications, the score should not be a perfect 20. The platform-side credibility is strong, but compliance depth beyond verification remains insufficiently documented.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 70+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.5M+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 5

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 70 orders over the past six months, along with a transaction value exceeding CN¥1.5M. This indicates active commercial performance and market engagement on the platform. The 5.0 store rating is positive and suggests customer satisfaction among recorded reviewers.

However, the review count is only 5, which limits the reliability of the rating as a broad representation of customer experience. A high score with a small review base should be treated cautiously because it may not fully reflect performance consistency across a larger customer sample. The transaction value and order volume are meaningful, but the available feedback dataset is relatively limited.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable business activity, with a reasonable number of recent orders and a notable transaction amount. These indicators support a medium-to-strong business performance score. Nevertheless, the low review count reduces the strength of social proof and limits confidence in long-term buyer satisfaction trends. Therefore, the supplier should be rated as commercially active and reasonably validated, but not yet at the highest level of business performance evidence.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2 hours
• Customization-related platform tags:
• Low MOQ for customization
• 3D design capabilities
• Product listings are customization-oriented
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates an acceptable and relatively efficient communication standard for online procurement. The presence of customization-related tags and multiple custom product listings suggests that the supplier is positioned to handle customized PVC card, holographic laminate, smart card overlay, and NFC/IC card-related product requirements.

However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability. While customization is clearly part of the supplier’s offering, the exact scope of customization—such as material selection, chip options, printing technologies, holographic design development, packaging customization, or end-to-end OEM/ODM service—is not specified. Therefore, the service capability appears good, but the depth of customization remains partially unverified.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤2 hours is positive but does not reach the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Customization-related tags and customized product listings support a good service score. However, because Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed and the communication speed is not at the highest level, the supplier should be rated in the upper-middle range rather than the top tier.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 97.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate of 97.5% is strong and exceeds the 90% benchmark for high delivery performance. This indicates reliable order fulfillment behavior within the platform’s recorded delivery metrics. For customized card products, delivery reliability is especially important because production often depends on artwork confirmation, customization requirements, and batch processing timelines.

No additional information is provided regarding average lead time, rush order capability, logistics partners, export documentation handling, or performance by destination market. Therefore, the assessment is based strictly on the stated on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for a 9–10 point range. At 97.5%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery discipline and should receive a top-tier score. Since the rate is close to full reliability and no negative delivery information is provided, a full score is justified within the available data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 5
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Supported by verified supplier status, but detailed factory verification report is not provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, which is positive from a customer feedback perspective. However, this rating is based on only 5 reviews, which is a limited sample size. As a result, the rating should be interpreted carefully and cannot be considered equivalent to a high-volume review base.

The supplier’s verified status provides some level of credibility, but the provided data does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available. There is also no detailed information on internal quality control procedures, inspection standards, defect rates, testing equipment, compliance certificates, or third-party inspection history. For customized PVC, smart card, holographic, and NFC/IC-related products, quality consistency can be highly specification-sensitive, so buyers should request samples and define inspection criteria before mass production.

Scoring Rationale

The 5.0 rating and verified supplier status support a positive quality outlook. However, the very low review count and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection limit the strength of the quality evidence. The supplier appears to have basic credibility and positive customer feedback, but the quality assurance system is not fully documented in the provided data. Therefore, a mid-to-upper score is appropriate, rather than a top-tier rating.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Shenzhen Ai Si Yun Anti-Counterfeiting Technology Development Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, solid factory scale, verified supplier status, good recent transaction activity, and excellent delivery performance. The supplier is suitable for buyers sourcing customized PVC cards, holographic card laminates, smart card overlays, membership cards, and NFC/IC card-related customized products, especially where MOQ of 1,000 pieces is acceptable.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers requiring customized card or holographic card-related products
- Importers seeking Trade Assurance-supported suppliers
- Small to medium buyers needing low-MOQ customization
- Procurement teams prioritizing reliable dispatch performance

Main risks:
- Only 5 customer reviews, limiting feedback reliability
- Finished Product Inspection status: Insufficient Data
- No detailed production capacity, equipment list, or quality control process provided
- No formal product or management system certifications shown in the supplied data

Growth potential:
The supplier has clear potential due to its long operating history, large stated factory area, customization positioning, and strong on-time dispatch rate. If it can provide more transparent quality control documentation, inspection procedures, certification records, and broader customer feedback, its procurement attractiveness would improve further.