Shenzhen Stone Cable Sales Depatrtment Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Shenzhen Stone Cable Sales Depatrtment is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 3,000+ sqm and 70+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized supplier with verified supplier status, long-term platform credibility, and strong recent transaction performance. Its product listings focus on USB hub and USB Type-C multi-port products, with low MOQ levels ranging from 2 to 10 pieces, which may suit buyers seeking flexible trial orders or small-batch procurement. The supplier demonstrates strong platform trust indicators, including 16 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and a 99.1% on-time delivery rate. Business performance is also solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥2.6M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, information on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, and specific factory certifications is not provided. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers prioritizing platform credibility, delivery reliability, and flexible MOQ sourcing.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Country/region: CN, Guangdong
- Factory area: 3,000+ sqm
- Employees: 70+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory certification details: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier reports a factory area of over 3,000 sqm and a workforce of more than 70 staff. This indicates a business with a defined physical production or operational base and a moderate labor scale. The verified supplier status provides additional support that the company has passed some form of supplier verification, although the data does not specify the scope, verification body, or whether this includes a full factory audit.
Scoring Rationale
The company does not appear to be a large-scale manufacturing group based on the available factory size and employee count, but it shows stronger capacity than a very small trading operation. The verified supplier status improves confidence in its operational legitimacy. However, the absence of detailed factory certification or audit documentation prevents a higher score in the large-scale stable supply chain range.
Final Score
16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: Response time ≤2h; On-time delivery 99.1%
- Factory or supplier verification: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a long Gold Supplier history of 16 years, which is a strong platform credibility signal. Trade Assurance support further strengthens buyer protection during transactions. The supplier also displays operational performance tags related to response time and delivery reliability. The verified supplier status adds another layer of platform-backed credibility.
Scoring Rationale
A 16-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status represent a mature and credible platform profile. The compliance profile is strong from a platform perspective. The only limitation is that the provided data does not include detailed third-party factory certifications or industry-specific compliance documents, so the score is kept slightly below the maximum.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 300+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.6M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 100+
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded over 300 orders and more than CN¥2.6M in transaction value within the past six months. This indicates active commercial traction and a meaningful level of recent buyer engagement. A store rating of 4.9 with 100+ reviews suggests generally positive customer feedback supported by a reasonable review base.
Scoring Rationale
The combination of high recent order volume, substantial transaction value, strong rating, and more than 100 reviews supports a high score. The data demonstrates that the supplier has been commercially validated by recent buyers. Since the order and review figures are presented as thresholds rather than exact values, and no repeat buyer or dispute data is provided, the score is strong but not absolute maximum.
Final Score
19 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is listed as within two hours, which indicates acceptable communication speed for online sourcing. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM/ODM customization, private labeling, packaging customization, or engineering-level product modification. Although one product title includes “OEM,” this alone is not sufficient to confirm actual customization capability.
Scoring Rationale
The response speed is solid, but it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. More importantly, customization capability is not confirmed in the supplied data. Therefore, the supplier can be rated as having normal service responsiveness, but not proven strong customization capability.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 99.1%
Elaboration
The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 99.1%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. This exceeds the 90% benchmark required for the highest scoring range in this category.
Scoring Rationale
A 99.1% on-time delivery rate indicates highly reliable shipment execution based on the available platform data. Since the metric is clearly provided and significantly above the top scoring threshold, the supplier qualifies for a maximum score in this dimension.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 100+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supplier verification is provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9 and more than 100 customer reviews, indicating generally positive buyer feedback. The verified supplier status adds some credibility to the company profile. However, the data does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available, whether inspection reports are provided, or whether the supplier has a complete quality management certification system.
Scoring Rationale
The customer feedback profile is strong due to the high rating and review count. However, quality assurance documentation is incomplete. Without confirmed Finished Product Inspection or detailed factory verification scope, the quality system cannot be considered fully proven. The supplier fits the range of good feedback with basic quality confidence, rather than a fully documented quality assurance structure.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
87 / 100
- Company Strength: 16 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
- Business Performance: 19 / 20
- Service Capability: 7 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended, especially for buyers seeking USB hub or USB Type-C multi-port products with flexible MOQ requirements and strong platform transaction protection. The supplier is most suitable for small to mid-sized importers, e-commerce sellers, trial-order buyers, and buyers who value Trade Assurance, long supplier platform history, high delivery reliability, and proven recent transaction activity.
Key risks include insufficient data on Full Customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory certification, and specific quality control procedures. Buyers should request product samples, inspection standards, packaging details, compliance documents, and written confirmation of customization capability before placing larger orders.
The supplier shows good growth potential due to its 16-year Gold Supplier history, 300+ recent orders, CN¥2.6M+ six-month transaction value, 4.9 rating, and 99.1% on-time delivery rate. Overall, it is a credible and commercially active supplier, but larger procurement programs should proceed with additional quality and compliance verification.
Leave your comment