Shandong Jiacheng Stone Coated Steel Roofing Tile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Shandong Jiacheng Stone Coated Steel Roofing Tile Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, focused on stone-coated metal roofing tile products. Based on the provided data, the company has an 8,200+ sqm factory area, 70+ staff, and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating a moderate production base with basic supply-chain credibility. Its platform profile is relatively strong, supported by 11 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and listed capabilities such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. However, recent business performance appears limited, with only 10+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value in the past six months, while store rating is unavailable and review count is 0. Delivery performance is acceptable but not outstanding, with an on-time shipment rate of 83.3%. This supplier is more suitable for buyers seeking verified mid-scale roofing tile suppliers with customization needs, while buyers requiring strong transaction history and customer feedback should conduct further due diligence.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 8,200+ sqm
- Employees: 70+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The company has a physical factory footprint of over 8,200 sqm and a workforce of more than 70 staff, suggesting it has an established manufacturing base rather than operating only as a trading entity. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operational presence. However, the available data does not provide detailed information on production lines, annual output, equipment level, export capacity, or factory audit reports.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier appears to fall into the medium-scale factory category rather than a large-scale supply-chain operator. Its factory size and employee count are sufficient for basic to moderate production capability, and verified supplier status improves confidence. However, the absence of detailed production capacity and formal factory certification information prevents a higher score.
Final Score
15 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 11 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance support provides additional transaction protection for buyers. The listed platform labels indicate that the supplier supports inspection, ODM, and customization services. These factors collectively show a relatively mature platform compliance profile.
Scoring Rationale
An 11-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status represent strong platform credibility. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and customization-related tags further strengthens the compliance profile. The score is not full because the provided data does not include independent factory audit details, internationally recognized management system certifications, or third-party compliance certificates.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded some recent transaction activity, but the order quantity and transaction amount are relatively limited. The absence of a store rating and the lack of customer reviews reduce the ability to evaluate buyer satisfaction and commercial consistency. The provided data confirms business activity, but not at a high volume.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates basic commercial validation through 10+ recent orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value. However, this is not enough to support a high business-performance score. The missing store rating and 0 reviews are key weaknesses because they limit visibility into repeat buyer confidence, service consistency, and product satisfaction.
Final Score
11 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Listed
- Minor Customization: Listed
- ODM service available: Listed
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the highest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The availability of Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service suggests that the supplier can support buyers with customized product requirements.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has stronger customization capability than a basic standard-product seller, which supports a good service score. However, the response time is not at the fastest level, and there is no additional data on quotation speed, technical support depth, sample handling, or after-sales responsiveness. Therefore, the service capability is assessed as solid but not top-tier.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 83.3%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time shipment rate of 83.3% falls within the 80% to 89% range. This indicates that the supplier has an acceptable delivery record, but there is still a meaningful risk of late shipment compared with suppliers exceeding 90%.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an 80% to 89% on-time shipment rate corresponds to 7 to 8 points. Since 83.3% is closer to the lower-middle part of this range, the supplier receives 7 points rather than 8. Buyers with strict project timelines should pay close attention to lead time confirmation and shipment milestones.
Final Score
7 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
Elaboration
The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection label, which indicates some level of quality-control process for completed goods. Verified supplier status also supports basic confidence in supplier legitimacy. However, no store rating is provided, and the review count is 0, meaning there is insufficient customer feedback to verify product consistency or buyer satisfaction.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, especially Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. However, quality evaluation is significantly limited by the lack of customer reviews and missing store rating. Because buyer feedback is absent, the supplier cannot be scored as a high-confidence quality performer despite having basic inspection-related labeling.
Final Score
13 / 20
Total Score
73 / 100
- Company Strength: 15 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
- Business Performance: 11 / 20
- Service Capability: 8 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 7 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 13 / 20
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Shandong Jiacheng Stone Coated Steel Roofing Tile Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers sourcing stone-coated metal roofing tiles who require a verified supplier with moderate factory scale, Trade Assurance support, and customization capability. The supplier may be appropriate for small to medium procurement projects, sample orders, customized roofing tile requirements, or buyers who can manage supplier verification through their own inspection process.
The main risks are limited recent transaction scale, missing store rating, 0 customer reviews, and only moderate delivery performance at 83.3% on-time shipment. These factors reduce transparency around buyer satisfaction, product consistency, and shipment reliability.
Before placing large-volume orders, buyers should request product samples, confirm production lead time, define inspection standards, use Trade Assurance, and consider third-party pre-shipment inspection. The supplier’s growth potential lies in its long platform history, verified status, customization labels, and finished product inspection capability, but stronger customer feedback and higher transaction volume would be needed to support a higher procurement confidence level.
Leave your comment