Yuyao Jiacheng Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yuyao Jiacheng Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering electric steam cleaning products such as handheld electric steam cleaners, steam mops, and portable household steam cleaning appliances. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale manufacturer or supplier with a factory area of over 2,000㎡ and more than 20 staff. It has basic platform credibility through Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status, but its Gold Supplier history is only 1 year. Commercial performance is still limited, with 10+ orders and CN¥40.5K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is high at 4.9, but only 2 reviews are available, which limits confidence in customer feedback depth. This supplier may be suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ steam cleaning appliances, but larger buyers should conduct further due diligence before scaling cooperation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 2,000+㎡
- Staff size: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical factory presence with over 2,000㎡ of space and more than 20 employees. This indicates basic production and operating capacity, but the scale remains relatively small compared with larger appliance manufacturers. The provided data does not include production lines, monthly output, equipment details, R&D capacity, or factory audit documentation beyond the verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates foundational manufacturing capability and some degree of supplier verification. However, the factory size and employee count suggest a small-scale operation rather than a large or mature supply chain platform. Because production capacity details are limited, the score should remain within the “small but basic production capability” range.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier history: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤5h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform-level trust indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits long-term platform credibility. The listed tags relate mainly to service response and delivery performance rather than product compliance, factory certification, or quality management certification.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core trust mechanisms in place, but its short Gold Supplier history and limited certification information prevent it from being classified as a highly established platform supplier. The credibility profile is acceptable for initial sourcing but not yet strong enough for high-confidence long-term procurement without further verification.

Final Score
15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥40.5K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Review count: 2

Elaboration
The supplier has achieved some transaction activity within the past six months, supported by 10+ orders and CN¥40.5K+ in transaction value. The store rating of 4.9 is positive, but the review base is very small, with only 2 reviews. This means the rating is encouraging but not yet strongly validated by a broad customer sample.

Scoring Rationale
The business performance shows early commercial traction but remains limited in order volume, transaction value, and review depth. The high rating supports a positive view, but the small number of reviews reduces the reliability of the performance signal. This places the supplier in the lower-to-mid range for business validation.

Final Score
12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤5h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤5 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. No data is provided regarding Full Customization, OEM/ODM support, design support, packaging customization, or engineering communication capability.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier appears responsive enough for standard inquiries, but the absence of customization information limits confidence in its service depth. It is suitable for basic procurement communication, but there is insufficient evidence to confirm strong customization or project-based service capability.

Final Score
6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator in the provided dataset. No additional data is provided on average lead time, logistics methods, production cycle, or historical shipment volume.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the provided on-time delivery rate, the supplier meets the highest scoring range for delivery performance. However, because order volume is relatively limited, this result should be interpreted positively but with continued monitoring as order scale increases.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Review count: 2
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9, which is positive from a customer feedback perspective. However, the review count is only 2, meaning the feedback base is too limited to support a highly reliable quality conclusion. The verified supplier status provides some quality-related confidence, but there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, quality management certification, inspection reports, or detailed factory audit results.

Scoring Rationale
Quality feedback is directionally positive but not yet sufficiently validated. The limited number of reviews and lack of explicit inspection system data prevent a higher score. The supplier shows basic quality credibility, but buyers should request samples, inspection reports, and quality control documentation before placing larger orders.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

68 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to mid-sized buyers seeking electric steam cleaning products with relatively low MOQ requirements. The supplier may be suitable for trial orders, sample-based evaluation, or small-batch procurement.

Key risks include limited company scale, only 1 year of Gold Supplier history, low review count, modest recent transaction volume, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, customization capability, production capacity, and quality certifications.

The supplier shows growth potential due to verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 100.0% on-time delivery, and a high store rating. However, larger buyers should conduct sample testing, request product compliance documents, confirm inspection procedures, and verify production capacity before moving to bulk procurement.