Ningbo Haifei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ningbo Haifei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, presenting a relatively solid manufacturing profile for washing machine products, including mini washing machines, single-tub models, and twin-tub washing machines. The supplier reports a factory area of over 10,000㎡ and more than 100 staff, supported by verified supplier status, indicating a medium-scale production base with basic operational credibility. Its platform profile is strong, with 23 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and listed capability tags such as finished product inspection, ODM service availability, warranty availability, and OEM for well-known brands. However, recent commercial performance data is insufficient, with missing six-month order volume, transaction value, shop rating, and zero reviews. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking established washing machine manufacturers with platform credibility and inspection-related support, but procurement decisions should include additional verification of recent transaction activity, customer feedback, and quality consistency.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 10,000+㎡
- Employees: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a medium-sized manufacturing foundation based on the reported factory area and employee count. A facility exceeding 10,000㎡ and a workforce above 100 staff suggest the company has more than basic production capability and may be able to support batch manufacturing for washing machine products. Verified supplier status adds credibility to the declared company profile.

Scoring Rationale:
The company does not appear to be a small workshop-level supplier, as both factory size and staffing level indicate a stable production base. However, the available data does not include detailed production capacity, annual output, production lines, or specific factory management certifications. Therefore, the score should reflect a medium-scale stable factory rather than a large-scale fully validated supply chain.

Final Score: 17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier history: 23 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, OEM for well-known brands, Finished product inspection, ODM service available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long Gold Supplier history of 23 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support provides additional transaction protection for buyers. The listed tags also show relevant commercial and compliance-related capabilities, particularly finished product inspection and ODM service availability.

Scoring Rationale:
The combination of long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple capability tags forms a strong platform credibility profile. While the data does not provide detailed third-party certification names or formal factory audit certificates beyond verification status, the platform-side credibility is still highly complete.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Past 6-month order quantity: Insufficient Data
- Past 6-month transaction amount: Insufficient Data
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration:
The available business performance data is weak. There is no disclosed recent order volume, no recent transaction value, and no shop rating. The review count is recorded as 0, meaning there is no visible buyer feedback in the provided dataset to validate recent transaction activity or customer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale:
Although the supplier has strong platform longevity, recent business performance cannot be confirmed from the provided data. The absence of order quantity, transaction value, and rating prevents a reliable assessment of current commercial activity. The score is therefore low due to insufficient market validation rather than confirmed poor performance.

Final Score: 6 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- ODM service available: Listed in platform tags

Elaboration:
A response time within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. The supplier also lists ODM service availability, suggesting some product development or customization capability. However, the provided data does not confirm Full Customization support specifically.

Scoring Rationale:
The response speed is reasonably strong but does not meet the highest benchmark of within one hour. ODM availability supports basic customization capability, but the absence of explicit Full Customization data prevents a top-tier service score. The supplier is therefore assessed as having normal-to-good service capability.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the dataset. This suggests reliable delivery execution based on the provided platform data.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier reaches the highest delivery performance level within the available data.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier provides some quality assurance indicators, especially the finished product inspection tag and verified supplier status. These suggest that certain quality control or verification mechanisms are present. However, there is no shop rating and no customer review history in the provided dataset, which limits the ability to assess actual buyer satisfaction or long-term product consistency.

Scoring Rationale:
The presence of finished product inspection supports a basic quality assurance framework, but the lack of customer feedback, rating data, and reviews creates a significant evaluation gap. The score reflects a supplier with some quality control indicators but insufficient customer-side validation.

Final Score: 13 / 20

Total Score

72 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Ningbo Haifei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking a medium-scale China-based washing machine supplier with strong platform history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and listed finished product inspection capability. It may be appropriate for importers, wholesalers, or private-label buyers requiring mini, single-tub, or twin-tub washing machine products.

The main risks are insufficient recent transaction data, missing shop rating, zero reviews, and lack of disclosed six-month order or transaction value. Before placing large orders, buyers should request updated transaction references, product inspection reports, production capacity details, sample testing, and written confirmation of customization scope. The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its long platform history, factory scale, ODM tag, and strong delivery rate, but commercial and customer-feedback validation remains necessary.