Shanghai Ebasee Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanghai Ebasee Electric Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of over 3,900㎡ and more than 160 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized manufacturer with verified supplier status and a product portfolio focused on household manual electrical components and modular contactor-related products. The supplier holds Gold Supplier status for 2 years and supports Trade Assurance, which provides a basic level of platform credibility. Its recent business activity shows 10+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, indicating commercial activity but not yet a large-scale transaction record. The store rating is 5.0, but the review base is very limited with only 1 review. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking medium-scale electrical component sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection, especially for trial orders or controlled-volume procurement. Key risks include limited customer feedback volume and insufficient data on customization depth.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company name: Shanghai Ebasee Electric Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China, Shanghai
• Factory area: 3,900+㎡
• Employees: 160+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope shown: household manual electrical products, 4-pole DC products, modular contactor-related products
• Factory audit or detailed factory certification: Insufficient Data beyond “Verified Supplier”

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area of over 3,900㎡ and more than 160 employees, which indicates a moderate manufacturing scale. This is not a very small trading-only profile based on the provided production-related data, and the employee count suggests the company may have a structured operational team. The verified supplier status adds a degree of credibility regarding the existence and basic business profile of the supplier.

However, the data does not provide detailed production capacity, number of production lines, monthly output, machinery list, internal testing equipment, factory audit reports, or specific factory certifications. Therefore, while the company demonstrates a reasonable physical and staffing base, the depth of manufacturing capability cannot be fully validated from the provided information alone.

Scoring Rationale

A factory area of 3,900+㎡ and 160+ staff place the supplier in the medium-sized factory category rather than a large-scale supply chain operation. The verified supplier status supports basic operational credibility, but the absence of detailed factory audit results, production capacity figures, or recognized manufacturing certifications limits the score. The company appears to have stable basic production capability, but the available data is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale or highly mature manufacturing supplier.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified Supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Project solutions
• Warranty available
• OEM for well-known brands
• Finished product inspection
• Detailed third-party compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has several platform-level credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are important for reducing transaction risk, especially for international buyers using as a sourcing channel. The availability of Trade Assurance is particularly relevant because it can provide structured order protection depending on transaction terms.

The supplier also has listed platform tags such as “Warranty available” and “Finished product inspection,” which suggest some level of after-sales and quality process visibility on the platform. However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established suppliers. Additionally, no detailed compliance certificates, product certifications, factory audit documents, or internationally recognized quality management certifications were provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. This supports a generally reliable platform profile. However, the short Gold Supplier history and lack of detailed compliance documentation prevent it from reaching the top score range. The credibility foundation is solid but not yet highly mature or extensively documented.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 10 orders and over CN¥202.8K in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates actual recent commercial activity on the platform. The transaction value is meaningful for a supplier at this scale, but the order count remains relatively limited. This suggests the supplier has some validated buyer engagement but does not yet show a high-volume transaction profile.

The store rating of 5.0 is positive, but the credibility of this rating is weakened by the very small review base of only 1 review. A single review is not enough to establish a statistically reliable customer satisfaction pattern. Therefore, while the existing business performance is positive, it should be interpreted cautiously.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates active business performance, but the data does not indicate strong marketplace traction. The order count is modest, and the review quantity is very limited. The CN¥202.8K+ transaction value supports a basic level of commercial validation, but it is not sufficient to classify the supplier as high-volume or strongly market-proven. The 5.0 rating is favorable but not yet strongly supported by customer feedback volume.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data
• Relevant tags: Project solutions, Warranty available, OEM for well-known brands
• Specific customization process, engineering support, sample lead time, or dedicated service team: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for sourcing purposes. This is suitable for standard inquiries, quotation discussions, and basic procurement communication. The platform tags such as “Project solutions” and “OEM for well-known brands” suggest that the supplier may have some project or OEM-related service experience, but the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability.

Since the scoring criterion specifically considers Full Customization, and this information is not directly provided, the analysis must treat customization capability as insufficiently verified. Buyers requiring deep customization, technical co-development, private tooling, or complex specification adjustments should request further confirmation before placing orders.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is reasonable but not at the highest level because it is not stated as within 1 hour. The supplier may have some OEM/project-service orientation based on the listed tags, but Full Customization is not confirmed. Therefore, the supplier fits the range of normal service responsiveness with possible basic project support, but not enough evidence exists to assign a top-tier service score.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong indicator of delivery reliability based on the available platform data. This suggests that recent fulfilled orders were shipped according to the agreed timelines. For procurement teams, delivery reliability is especially important when sourcing electrical components where production schedules, resale commitments, or project installation timelines may be affected by shipment delays.

However, the total order volume is only listed as 10+ orders in the past six months. Therefore, although the delivery rate is excellent, the sample size is not large. Buyers should still confirm lead times, production schedules, and logistics arrangements for larger or repeat orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s stated on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, it deserves the maximum score for this dimension. The limited order volume is noted as a contextual consideration but does not reduce the score under the stated delivery-performance rule.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1
• Finished product inspection: Listed as platform tag
• Verified Supplier: True
• Factory Verification: Interpreted from “Verified Supplier: True” only
• Detailed quality certifications, test reports, defect rate, or inspection procedures: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive, and the “Finished product inspection” tag indicates that some form of product inspection process is represented on the platform. Verified supplier status also supports basic supplier credibility. These are useful indicators for quality assurance, especially for buyers who require at least basic inspection visibility before shipment.

However, the review count is only 1, which significantly limits the reliability of the customer feedback profile. A high rating based on a single review cannot be considered a mature or broadly validated quality record. In addition, the provided data does not include specific quality management certifications, product compliance certificates, laboratory testing records, inspection standards, defect-rate data, or after-sales claim history.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has positive quality-related indicators, including a 5.0 rating, finished product inspection tag, and verified supplier status. However, the extremely limited review base prevents a high-confidence assessment of actual customer satisfaction. The quality assurance system appears to have a basic platform-supported foundation, but there is insufficient evidence to confirm a comprehensive or highly mature quality management framework.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Shanghai Ebasee Electric Co., Ltd. is recommended for controlled-volume sourcing, trial orders, or medium-risk procurement projects where Trade Assurance can be used to reduce transaction risk. The supplier has a reasonable factory scale, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection indication, and a strong stated on-time delivery rate.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers seeking household electrical components or modular contactor-related products shown in the provided data
- Importers or distributors planning trial orders before scaling volume
- Buyers requiring platform-backed transaction protection
- Procurement teams comfortable with medium-sized suppliers rather than fully validated large-scale manufacturers

Main risks:
- Only 1 customer review, making the 5.0 rating weakly validated
- Gold Supplier history is limited to 2 years
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- Detailed factory certifications, production capacity, and quality certificates are not provided
- Business volume is active but still moderate, with only 10+ orders in the past six months

Growth potential:
The supplier shows potential due to its verified status, medium factory scale, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection tag, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate. If it can build a larger transaction record, increase customer reviews, and provide clearer quality and compliance documentation, its procurement attractiveness would improve significantly.