Ganzhou Daye Metallic Fibres Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ganzhou Daye Metallic Fibres Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangxi, offering products including polypropylene fiber, recycled polypropylene non-woven fabric, steel fiber, and PAN fiber. Based on the provided data, the company has a factory area of over 6,300㎡ and more than 10 staff, indicating a physical manufacturing base but a relatively small disclosed workforce. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and compliance indicators: it is a 16-year Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. Recent business performance shows 30+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating, although the review count is limited at 7. The supplier also demonstrates strong delivery performance with a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, it appears suitable for buyers seeking verified China-based suppliers for fiber-related materials, especially those requiring low MOQ and customization options, while larger buyers should further verify production capacity and quality inspection systems before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Ganzhou Daye Metallic Fibres Co., Ltd.
• Location: Jiangxi, China
• Factory area: 6,300+㎡
• Employees: 10+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Product coverage includes polypropylene fiber, recycled polypropylene non-woven fabric, steel fiber, and PAN fiber.

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed factory area of over 6,300㎡, which suggests the presence of a physical production or processing facility of reasonable size. However, the disclosed employee count is only “10+ staff,” which limits the visible scale of human resources and may indicate a relatively lean operational structure. The product range shows coverage across several fiber-related materials, including synthetic fibers and steel fiber, but the data does not provide detailed production lines, annual capacity, equipment lists, or export volume.

The “verified supplier” status provides some positive support for company legitimacy, but there is no additional information on specific factory certifications, quality management system certifications, or third-party audit reports beyond the verification indicator.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic-to-moderate manufacturing strength due to its 6,300+㎡ facility and verified supplier status. However, the limited disclosed workforce of 10+ staff and lack of detailed production capacity data prevent it from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. It is stronger than a very small or unverified supplier, but the available data does not fully support a high score in this dimension.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 16-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. The availability of Trade Assurance improves transactional security for buyers by offering platform-backed order protection. The verified supplier status further supports supplier identity and basic compliance credibility.

The listed platform tags also indicate service-related capabilities such as ODM service, full customization, minor customization, and warranty availability. However, these are platform tags rather than detailed third-party certifications. No specific ISO, product compliance, industry certification, or laboratory testing certification is provided in the submitted data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several core credibility indicators: long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The 16-year platform history is particularly strong and supports trustworthiness from a platform perspective. The only limitation is the absence of specific documented certifications beyond platform-level tags and verification status. Therefore, the supplier deserves a high score, though not a perfect one.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past six months: 30+
• Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥405.6K+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 7

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 30 orders and over CN¥405.6K in transaction value within the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has recent commercial activity and has completed transactions through the platform. The store rating of 4.9 is strong and suggests positive buyer satisfaction among reviewed transactions.

However, the review count is only 7, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. While the transaction amount is meaningful, the order count is not high enough to classify the supplier as a highly active, large-volume platform seller based on the provided data alone.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable recent business activity with moderate transaction value and a high store rating. However, the limited review base and only 30+ orders in six months suggest that commercial validation is present but not extensive. This supports a mid-to-upper score rather than a top-tier score.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Response time: ≤2h
• Platform tags: Full customization, Minor customization, ODM service available, Warranty available

Elaboration

The supplier’s disclosed response time is within two hours, which is acceptable for B2B sourcing communication. It is not within the strongest benchmark of one hour or less, but it still indicates timely responsiveness. The presence of full customization, minor customization, and ODM service tags suggests that the supplier can support different levels of buyer-specific requirements.

However, the data does not include further details such as dedicated account management, English communication capability, sample lead time, technical support process, or after-sales workflow. Therefore, the evaluation must remain limited to the disclosed platform indicators.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service capability through a reasonable response time and multiple customization-related tags. Because the response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, and because detailed service process data is not provided, the score should be strong but not maximum.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided in the dataset. This suggests that recent orders have been dispatched within agreed timelines on the platform. For procurement teams, this is a positive signal, especially when evaluating suppliers for repeat replenishment or time-sensitive purchasing.

However, the data does not specify total shipment volume, average lead time, logistics channels, export handling capability, or historical delivery performance beyond the disclosed on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s rate is 100.0%, it deserves the maximum score for this dimension based on the available data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 7
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True, based on provided verified supplier status

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9, which is positive from a customer feedback perspective. However, the number of reviews is only 7, meaning the rating is based on a limited sample size. This reduces the confidence level of the feedback assessment.

The supplier is marked as verified, which supports basic quality and operational credibility. However, there is no explicit data confirming Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, inspection reports, defect rate, product testing standards, or third-party quality certifications. Therefore, while the available indicators are positive, the quality assurance system is not fully evidenced by the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s high rating and verified status support a favorable quality impression. However, the limited review count and absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection or detailed QC documentation prevent a higher score. The quality profile appears acceptable but requires further validation before large-scale procurement.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation is recommended.

Ganzhou Daye Metallic Fibres Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, long-term presence, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, good responsiveness, and excellent disclosed delivery performance. It is suitable for buyers looking for fiber-related materials such as polypropylene fiber, steel fiber, recycled polypropylene non-woven fabric, and PAN fiber, especially for low-MOQ trial orders, customized requirements, or medium-scale sourcing.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers seeking verified China-based fiber material suppliers
- Importers requiring Trade Assurance protection
- Customers needing low MOQ trial procurement
- Buyers with customization or ODM-related requirements
- Medium-scale purchasers requiring stable but not necessarily large-volume supply

Main risks:
- Employee count is only disclosed as 10+ staff, limiting visibility into production scale.
- Review count is low at 7, reducing confidence in customer feedback reliability.
- Finished Product Inspection data is not provided.
- No specific third-party quality certifications or detailed production capacity data are available.

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong platform credibility and a long operating history on . If it can provide more transparent production capacity data, QC documentation, inspection reports, and additional customer feedback, it has potential to become a more reliable option for larger-volume procurement programs.