Ganzhou Quanbiao Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ganzhou Quanbiao Biological Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangxi, offering whey protein powder, mass gainer, vitamin/mineral whey products, and micronized creatine products with relatively high MOQs of 1,000 barrels or 1,000 bags. Based on the provided data, the company shows a medium-scale manufacturing profile, supported by a factory area of 15,000+㎡, 120+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is acceptable, with 2 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection, ODM service availability, and minor customization capability. Business performance appears moderate, with 50+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.5 store rating but only 10+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale procurement of sports nutrition powder products with basic customization and platform-backed transaction protection. Key concerns include limited review volume, moderate on-time shipment rate, and insufficient evidence of broader factory certifications.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Jiangxi, China
• Factory area: 15,000+㎡
• Employees: 120+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Product scope includes whey protein powders, mass gainer, vitamin/mineral whey products, and creatine monohydrate products

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a medium-scale production profile. A factory area exceeding 15,000㎡ and a workforce of over 120 staff indicate that the company is beyond a small workshop-level operation and likely has basic organizational and production capacity. The presence of multiple listed powder-based nutrition products also suggests a focused product category rather than a highly fragmented catalog.

However, while the supplier is marked as verified, the provided data does not include detailed information on production lines, annual output, equipment capacity, R&D team size, laboratory capability, food safety certifications, or export compliance certifications. Therefore, the company’s production strength can be assessed as stable at a medium level, but not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale mature supply chain.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the “medium-sized stable factory” range due to its factory size, employee count, and verified supplier status. The score is not placed in the 18–20 range because the data does not provide evidence of large-scale production volume, advanced factory certifications, or extensive manufacturing infrastructure.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Minor customization
• Verified supplier status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and relevant service/inspection tags. Trade Assurance provides transaction-level protection, while verified supplier status improves buyer confidence compared with unverified sellers. The availability of finished product inspection is also a positive signal for compliance and quality control at the product stage.

However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established platform suppliers. In addition, the provided data does not mention internationally recognized certifications, food-grade certifications, management system certifications, or third-party audit reports. Therefore, the supplier has a credible basic platform compliance structure, but the compliance profile is not yet comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core credibility elements, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and inspection-related tags. However, the relatively short Gold Supplier duration and lack of detailed certification information prevent a higher rating.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 50+
• Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
• Store rating: 4.5
• Review count: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has visible recent transaction activity, with more than 50 orders in the past six months. This indicates that the store is commercially active and has some level of market acceptance. The transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ shows measurable sales performance, but it does not indicate a high-volume or high-value commercial track record.

The store rating of 4.5 is acceptable and suggests generally positive buyer feedback. However, the review count of only 10+ is limited, which weakens the reliability of the rating as a broad market validation indicator. A small review base means the score may not fully reflect consistent long-term buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates moderate recent business activity but not strong commercial validation. The order count is acceptable, while transaction value and review volume remain relatively limited. The 4.5 rating supports a fair assessment but does not offset the small number of reviews.

Final Score

13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Response time: ≤2 hours
• ODM service available
• Minor customization available
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of no more than 2 hours reflects a reasonably responsive communication standard, although it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The availability of ODM service and minor customization indicates that the supplier can support some product adaptation or private-label-type requirements.

However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability. Since only ODM service and minor customization are listed, it would be inappropriate to assume full formulation development, packaging development, or end-to-end customization capability beyond the provided information. Therefore, the service capability is considered functional and suitable for buyers with standard or moderately customized requirements.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has acceptable response speed and evidence of basic customization support. The score is not higher because response time is above the top-tier threshold and Full Customization is not confirmed.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 82.1%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time shipment rate of 82.1% falls within the 80%–89% range. This indicates that delivery performance is acceptable but not highly reliable. Buyers should expect a generally functional delivery process, but the data suggests there may still be some shipment delays.

For procurement planning, this supplier may be suitable for orders where moderate delivery flexibility is acceptable. For time-sensitive launches, seasonal campaigns, or strict replenishment schedules, buyers may need to confirm lead times, production scheduling, and shipment commitments in advance.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Given the rate is closer to the lower-middle of this band at 82.1%, a conservative score is appropriate.

Final Score

7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.5
• Review count: 10+
• Finished product inspection: Available
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Warranty available
• Factory Verification: True, based on provided verified supplier status
• Additional quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has several positive quality-related indicators. Finished product inspection suggests that products are checked before dispatch, while verified supplier status provides an additional level of platform-backed credibility. Warranty availability also indicates some post-sale support structure.

The store rating of 4.5 is reasonably good, but the review count of 10+ is relatively limited. This means the quality feedback base is not large enough to strongly validate consistent performance across many buyers or repeated bulk orders. In addition, the data does not provide information on product testing standards, batch testing, food safety certifications, laboratory reports, or third-party quality certifications. For nutrition powder products, such missing quality documentation should be treated as a key due diligence item before bulk procurement.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection and verified status, supported by a decent store rating. However, the limited review count and lack of detailed certification or testing data restrict the score to the mid-range rather than a high-quality assurance level.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended

Ganzhou Quanbiao Biological Technology Co., Ltd. can be considered for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking medium-scale sourcing of whey protein powder, mass gainer, vitamin/mineral whey products, or creatine products with platform-backed transaction protection. The supplier is most suitable for small to mid-sized brands, distributors, or buyers requiring ODM service and minor customization rather than highly complex full customization.

Suitable customer types: - Buyers seeking moderate-volume procurement with MOQ tolerance of 1,000 barrels or 1,000 bags
- Sports nutrition product distributors
- Private-label buyers requiring basic ODM or minor customization
- Buyers who prefer Trade Assurance-backed transactions

Main risks: - Limited customer review base of only 10+ reviews
- Moderate on-time shipment rate of 82.1%
- Gold Supplier history is only 2 years
- Insufficient data on food safety certifications, laboratory testing, production capacity, and full customization capability

Growth potential: The supplier has a solid medium-scale factory foundation, verified status, finished product inspection, and measurable recent transaction activity. If it can improve delivery reliability, increase review volume, and provide stronger certification or testing documentation, its procurement attractiveness would improve significantly.