zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, offering gasoline inverter and generator-related products with listed power ranges including 2kW, 3kW, 4kW, 5kW, 6.5kW, and 8kW. Based on the provided data, the company has a moderate physical operating base with a factory area of over 3,700 m² and more than 30 staff, supported by verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is reasonable, with 3 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and visible transaction activity. Business performance is comparatively strong, with over 300 orders and CN¥3.1M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating and 100+ reviews. Delivery performance is a clear strength, with a 99.5% on-time dispatch rate. However, information on full customization capability, finished product inspection, and formal product or factory certifications is insufficient. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ generator/inverter sourcing with verified platform transaction history.

Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company name: Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Shanghai, China
  • Factory area: 3,700+ m²
  • Employees: 30+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope shown: gasoline inverter / generator-related products
  • MOQ for listed products: 1 set

Elaboration

The supplier has a documented operating site of over 3,700 m² and more than 30 staff, indicating a small-to-medium production or trading-and-production structure rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturing base. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of the company’s basic operational profile. The listed product range is concentrated around inverter and generator models, suggesting a relatively focused product category rather than a broad unrelated catalog.

The low MOQ of 1 set across the provided product listings may be attractive for sample orders, small-volume buyers, testing purchases, or distributors validating demand before scaling. However, the provided data does not include detailed production capacity, monthly output, machinery list, production lines, R&D team size, or formal factory certification details beyond verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic and credible operating strength through its factory area, staff count, and verified supplier status. However, the scale is not large enough to be considered a major high-capacity manufacturing base based on the available information. The staff size of 30+ and factory area of 3,700+ m² place it closer to a small-to-medium supplier profile. The absence of detailed production capacity and factory certification data limits the ability to assign a higher score.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags provided: “Response time ≤3h”
  • Other certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. A 3-year Gold Supplier history shows some continuity on the platform, though it is not yet a long-tenure supplier. Trade Assurance availability provides buyers with a platform-supported transaction protection mechanism. Verified supplier status further supports baseline credibility.

However, the provided certification or industry label information is limited. The only listed tag is related to response time rather than a product certification, quality management certification, or industry-specific compliance standard. No data is provided for ISO certification, CE, EPA, emissions compliance, product test reports, or other generator/inverter-related certification systems. Therefore, while platform credibility is present, compliance depth cannot be fully confirmed from the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. These are positive and reduce procurement uncertainty at the platform level. Nevertheless, the Gold Supplier tenure is moderate at 3 years, and the certification label information is incomplete from a compliance perspective. Because no formal product or factory certifications are provided, the score should remain in the mid-range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 300+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥3.1M+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Review count: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity on the platform. More than 300 orders in the past six months indicates consistent buyer engagement. A transaction value above CN¥3.1M suggests that the supplier has achieved meaningful sales volume within a recent and relevant period. The store rating of 4.6 is positive, though not at the absolute top level. The presence of more than 100 reviews also provides a useful customer feedback base.

Compared with suppliers that have only limited transaction history or minimal review volume, this supplier has stronger commercial validation. The combination of order quantity, transaction value, and review base suggests that buyers are actively purchasing from this supplier. However, the data does not provide repeat buyer rate, dispute rate, refund rate, or customer geography, so deeper commercial stability cannot be fully assessed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in transaction activity, with both high order count and significant transaction value over the past six months. The 4.6 rating and 100+ reviews support a generally positive commercial track record. The score is high because the business data shows active market acceptance, but it is not a perfect score because the store rating is not exceptionally high and additional performance indicators are not provided.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Platform tag: “Response time ≤3h”
  • Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
  • Additional service capability data: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates acceptable communication responsiveness, with a stated response time of no more than 3 hours. This is positive for inquiry handling, quotation discussions, and order coordination. A response time within 3 hours can support normal procurement communication, especially for initial sourcing and routine order follow-up.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM/ODM services, packaging customization, branding, technical modification, or private-label production. Since customization capability is a key component of service evaluation, the lack of confirmation limits the service score. No data is provided regarding multilingual support, engineering support, after-sales response, warranty handling, or technical documentation support.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s response speed is acceptable but not within the highest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. More importantly, Full Customization capability is not provided in the data, so it cannot be credited. The supplier therefore appears capable of basic communication and order handling, but its deeper service capability remains unverified.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 99.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 99.5% is a strong performance indicator. This suggests that, for platform-recorded transactions, the supplier has demonstrated a high level of shipment punctuality. For procurement teams, this is particularly valuable because delivery reliability directly affects inventory planning, customer fulfillment, and project scheduling.

The provided data does not include average lead time, production lead time by order size, logistics methods, shipping destinations, or historical delay reasons. Nevertheless, the on-time dispatch rate alone is clearly strong and falls well above the 90% threshold for the highest scoring band.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the provided 99.5% on-time dispatch rate, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance range. The score reflects excellent punctuality in dispatch performance. No deduction is applied because the available delivery metric is clear and exceeds the top benchmark.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Review count: 100+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided as True
  • Product certifications or quality system certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive customer feedback profile, with a 4.6 store rating and more than 100 reviews. This provides a meaningful base for assessing buyer satisfaction, although the actual content of reviews is not provided. Verified supplier status also supports baseline credibility, but it should not be interpreted as a complete quality management certification unless explicitly stated.

There is no provided data confirming Finished Product Inspection, quality control process, inspection reports, defect rate, warranty claims, product testing procedures, or third-party product certifications. For generator and inverter products, quality control is important due to mechanical, electrical, and safety-related performance expectations; however, no additional certification or inspection evidence is included in the supplied dataset. Therefore, quality confidence is moderate to good, but not fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a solid score because the store rating is favorable, review volume is meaningful, and verified supplier status provides some assurance. However, the absence of Finished Product Inspection data and formal quality certification information prevents the supplier from reaching the highest scoring range. The available evidence supports a good but not fully validated quality profile.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 15 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 6 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking generator or inverter-related products with low MOQ, active platform transaction history, and strong delivery reliability. The supplier is particularly suitable for small-to-medium buyers, trial-order purchasers, distributors testing product demand, and procurement teams that prefer Trade Assurance-supported transactions.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers requiring low MOQ starting from 1 set
- Importers or distributors evaluating gasoline inverter/generator products
- Buyers prioritizing recent transaction history and strong on-time dispatch performance
- Procurement teams comfortable working through Trade Assurance

Main risks:
- Insufficient data on Full Customization capability
- Insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection
- Insufficient data on formal product certifications or quality management certifications
- Limited visibility into actual production capacity, monthly output, and technical testing procedures

Growth potential:
The supplier shows promising commercial momentum, supported by 300+ recent orders, CN¥3.1M+ transaction value, and a 99.5% on-time dispatch rate. If the supplier can provide clearer evidence of product certifications, inspection processes, and customization capability, its procurement attractiveness could improve significantly for larger or more compliance-sensitive buyers.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sunbright Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sunbright Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yucai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yucai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Caiyibiao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Caiyibiao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ranchao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ranchao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sencan Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sencan Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinben Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinben Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lianhua Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lianhua Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Taixiong Magnetic Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Taixiong Magnetic Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Feiyan Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Feiyan Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fa Yu Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fa Yu Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lu Qing Industrial Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lu Qing Industrial Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Enhua Industrial Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enhua Industrial Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cnmi Industrial Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Cnmi Industrial Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Diwei Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Diwei Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Opled Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Opled Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Xingpeng Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Xingpeng Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Jiangsu Yunbian Transformer Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yunbian Transformer Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Mingko Industry Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Mingko Industry Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Shouliang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Shouliang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenxing Baicao (Beijing) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenxing Baicao (Beijing) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Love Building Materials Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Love Building Materials Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Ruian Mingyuan Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruian Mingyuan Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wisdomshow Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wisdomshow Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Xinhengli Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Xinhengli Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huapo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huapo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fitwell Headwear & Bag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fitwell Headwear & Bag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Hongjie Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Hongjie Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tiancheng Superior Clothing Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tiancheng Superior Clothing Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Jeerayfun Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Jeerayfun Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Zhongsheng Constant Magnetic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Zhongsheng Constant Magnetic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ruining Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ruining Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Yunjia Textile Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Yunjia Textile Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chengda Auto Sales Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chengda Auto Sales Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Client Diesel Engine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Client Diesel Engine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Getter Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Getter Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Focuslaser Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Focuslaser Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026