Shanghai Caiyibiao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanghai Caiyibiao Industrial Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, offering custom design red packets / Hongbao matte products with a low MOQ of 100 pieces and a listed price range of CN¥0.0677–0.6762 per piece. Based on the provided data, the supplier appears suitable for small to medium-volume buyers seeking customized paper gifting or festive packaging products with flexible order entry. The company has a reported factory area of 1,900+㎡ and holds verified supplier status, but employee count is not provided, limiting the visibility of its production scale. On -related credibility, the supplier has 3 years as a Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and has completed supplier verification. Business performance is moderate, with 100+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value in the past six months. Its 100% on-time shipment rate is a strong delivery indicator. Key risks include insufficient data on employees, finished product inspection, and full customization capability.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company Name: Shanghai Caiyibiao Industrial Co., Ltd.
• Country / Region: China, Shanghai
• Factory Area: 1,900+㎡
• Employee Count: Insufficient Data
• Verified / Audited Supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a declared factory area of over 1,900㎡, which indicates a physical production or operational base rather than a purely trading-oriented storefront. The presence of verified supplier status also provides some support for the legitimacy of the company profile. However, the absence of employee count limits the ability to assess actual labor capacity, production scalability, management depth, and order handling capability during peak demand periods.

The available product data shows a focus on custom design red packets / Hongbao matte products, suggesting a specialized product offering rather than a broad industrial manufacturing portfolio. The factory size is adequate for basic to moderate production needs, but it does not indicate a large-scale manufacturing operation based on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic manufacturing strength through its 1,900+㎡ facility and verified supplier status. However, the missing employee number creates uncertainty around production manpower and scalability. Based strictly on the available data, the company should be assessed as a small to mid-sized supplier with basic operational capability rather than a large-scale stable supply chain. The verified status supports credibility, but the lack of workforce and production capacity details prevents a higher score.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier Duration: 3 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Supplier / Factory Verification: True
• Certification / Industry Tags: “Response time ≤6h”
• Product or industry certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a credible basic platform profile, including Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements reduce procurement risk compared with suppliers lacking platform-backed verification or transaction protection. A 3-year Gold Supplier history shows some continuity on the platform, although it is not yet a long-established tenure.

The available certification or platform tag only identifies response time within six hours. No product compliance certifications, factory management certifications, quality system certifications, or industry-specific certifications are provided in the dataset. Therefore, while the supplier has essential platform credibility, its compliance documentation appears limited based on the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several core platform credibility indicators: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the 3-year tenure is moderate rather than long-term, and the absence of additional certification details limits compliance confidence. The score reflects a supplier with solid platform fundamentals but incomplete certification depth.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in Past 6 Months: 100+
• Transaction Value in Past 6 Months: CN¥270.4K+
• Store Rating: 4.7 / 5.0
• Number of Reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders over the past six months, which indicates active commercial engagement on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥270.4K+ demonstrates measurable sales activity, though the scale is not high enough to indicate a major high-volume supplier based on the provided figures.

The store rating of 4.7 is positive and suggests general customer satisfaction. However, the review count of 20+ is relatively limited, meaning the rating base is not extensive. The business data supports the conclusion that the supplier has real transaction history and market activity, but the available evidence does not show very large-scale commercial validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable but moderate business performance. The 100+ recent orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value provide reasonable commercial proof, while the 4.7 rating supports a positive customer experience. However, the relatively small review base and moderate transaction amount prevent classification as a high-volume, highly proven supplier.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication Response Time: ≤6h
• Platform Tag: “Response time ≤6h”
• Full Customization Support: Insufficient Data
• Product Description Includes “Custom Design”: Yes, for the listed red packet product

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within six hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for standard procurement communication. This is not at the strongest service level, as the highest benchmark requires response within one hour, but it is still a practical response standard for most sourcing inquiries.

The listed product is described as “Custom Design Red Packets Hongbao Matte,” which indicates that customization is part of the offered product format. However, the dataset does not explicitly state “Full Customization” capability. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that the supplier supports advanced customization such as full structural design, material customization, packaging engineering, or complex OEM/ODM services.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a normal and commercially acceptable response capability, supported by the ≤6h response tag. The product listing suggests customization availability, but full customization capability is not confirmed. Therefore, the service capability is assessed as adequate for standard customized orders but not strong enough for a top-tier service score.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time Shipment Rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. Based on the scoring standard, any on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the highest score range. This suggests that the supplier has demonstrated strong delivery discipline within the available transaction record.

However, the dataset does not provide additional delivery details such as average lead time, peak-season performance, logistics methods, or order volume distribution. Therefore, the assessment is based only on the provided on-time shipment rate.

Scoring Rationale

A 100.0% on-time shipment rate meets the highest delivery performance standard. While further logistics data is unavailable, the provided metric is clear and directly supports a top score for this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store Rating: 4.7 / 5.0
• Number of Reviews: 20+
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory / Supplier Verification: True
• Product Certification or Quality System Certification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s 4.7 store rating is positive and indicates generally favorable customer feedback. The review count of 20+ provides some market validation, but it is not large enough to represent a broad or highly mature customer feedback base. The supplier’s verified status adds a basic layer of credibility, but specific quality assurance systems are not stated.

There is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing, quality management certification, or industry compliance certification. This limits the ability to fully assess quality control depth. For procurement purposes, the supplier appears to have acceptable customer feedback but incomplete documented quality assurance.

Scoring Rationale

The score reflects a supplier with good customer rating and verified supplier status, but limited review volume and insufficient data on formal inspection or quality control systems. The supplier is not positioned as high-risk from the available feedback, but the lack of Finished Product Inspection data prevents a higher quality score.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation is recommended.

Shanghai Caiyibiao Industrial Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking custom design red packets / Hongbao matte products, especially small to medium-volume buyers requiring a low MOQ and acceptable platform protection through Trade Assurance. Its strongest advantages are verified supplier status, 3-year Gold Supplier history, 100+ recent orders, positive 4.7 store rating, and excellent 100.0% on-time shipment rate.

However, procurement should proceed with controlled risk management. Key risks include Insufficient Data on employee count, Insufficient Data on Finished Product Inspection, Insufficient Data on full customization capability, and limited quality-system evidence. The review base of 20+ also provides only moderate customer validation.

For first cooperation, a trial order is advisable before scaling volume. Buyers should request confirmation of production capacity, inspection procedures, customization scope, sample approval process, and pre-shipment quality checks. The supplier shows growth potential as a verified, active platform seller with stable delivery performance, but additional documentation is needed before large-volume or quality-sensitive procurement.