Hangzhou Paishun Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Hangzhou Paishun Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Hangzhou Paishun Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang-based Chinese supplier focused on rubber, plastic, and silicone hose-related products, including refrigerant charging hoses, silicone caps, silicone elbow hoses, and custom molded rubber parts. Based on the provided data, the company operates with a factory area of over 2,500㎡ and more than 80 staff, indicating a small-to-medium manufacturing setup with basic production stability. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and compliance support: it has 19 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and is listed as a verified supplier with tags such as Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and Warranty available. Business activity is moderate, with 40+ orders and CN¥608.5K+ transaction value over the past six months, but customer feedback is weak due to 0 reviews and unavailable store rating. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking flexible customization and moderate-volume sourcing, while review-based quality validation remains a key risk.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 2,500+㎡
• Employees: 80+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope includes rubber/plastic/silicone hose and molded rubber parts

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated factory scale, with over 2,500㎡ of operating area and more than 80 employees. This indicates that the company is not merely a trading entity based on the provided information, especially as it is marked as a verified supplier. The product range also suggests manufacturing capability in rubber and silicone-related industrial components, including standard hose products and custom molded rubber parts.

However, the factory size and workforce are not large enough to classify the supplier as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer. The data supports a profile of a small-to-medium production operation with basic manufacturing capacity and some level of production organization.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a stable manufacturing base with verified supplier status, a defined factory area, and a meaningful employee count. These factors support a positive assessment of production capability. Nevertheless, compared with large-scale factories, the available data does not show extensive production capacity, multiple facilities, advanced automation, or large workforce scale. Therefore, the score falls within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the large-scale category.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 19 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Warranty available
• Finished Product Inspection
• Full customization
• ODM service available

Elaboration

This is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. A 19-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, which is a meaningful credibility factor on . Trade Assurance availability provides buyers with transaction protection mechanisms. The supplier is also marked as verified, and the platform tags cover quality inspection, customization, ODM capability, and warranty availability.

The provided tags appear relatively complete for a platform-based procurement evaluation, especially for buyers who require customization and inspection support. No additional third-party international certifications are listed in the provided data, so no assumptions can be made beyond the stated platform and supplier verification information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets nearly all key criteria for platform credibility: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple relevant capability tags. The 19-year platform history significantly strengthens its trust profile. The only reason for not assigning a perfect score is that the data does not provide further details on factory audit reports, international quality certifications, or specific compliance documentation beyond platform tags.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past six months: 40+
• Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥608.5K+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier shows measurable commercial activity, with more than 40 orders and over CN¥608.5K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has active buyers and recent sales traction on the platform. The transaction amount is meaningful for a small-to-medium supplier and suggests that it has completed orders of some commercial scale.

However, the absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews create a limitation in validating customer satisfaction, repeat buyer confidence, and post-transaction performance. While order and transaction data support basic business credibility, the lack of review-based evidence weakens the overall business performance assessment.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs better than a low-activity vendor due to its recent order count and transaction value. However, it cannot be rated as a high-performing supplier because there is no available store score and no customer reviews. This creates a gap in commercial validation, especially for buyers relying on customer feedback before procurement decisions. Therefore, the score is placed in the lower-middle range.

Final Score

13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Response time: ≤3 hours
• Full customization: Listed
• ODM service available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates acceptable service responsiveness, with communication response time listed as within three hours. This is suitable for standard procurement communication, quotation discussion, and order clarification. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service tags also indicates that the supplier can support customized requirements rather than only supplying fixed catalog items.

However, the response time is not within one hour, so it does not meet the highest service capability threshold. Also, the provided data does not include details such as engineering support, sample lead time, dedicated account management, language support, or technical design assistance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a solid service foundation due to acceptable response speed and customization capability. It is suitable for buyers requiring product adjustments or ODM-style sourcing. The score is not higher because the response time is moderate rather than excellent, and the available data does not provide deeper evidence of advanced service infrastructure.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 96.2%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 96.2% is strong and exceeds the 90% benchmark for top-tier delivery performance under the provided scoring rules. This suggests that the supplier has demonstrated reliable fulfillment performance on recorded platform transactions.

This metric is particularly important for buyers managing replenishment cycles, production schedules, or project-based procurement timelines. However, the data does not provide further detail on average lead time, urgent order handling, logistics modes, or historical delivery volume by product type.

Scoring Rationale

A 96.2% on-time shipment rate clearly qualifies for the highest scoring band. While additional logistics data would be helpful for deeper assessment, the provided delivery metric is strong and directly supports a high score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Listed
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier has several quality-related platform indicators, including Finished Product Inspection, verified supplier status, and Warranty available. These are positive signals, particularly for buyers sourcing rubber, silicone, or molded components where dimensional accuracy, material consistency, and product durability may be important.

However, the customer feedback side is weak. The store rating is not provided, and the review count is 0. This means there is no customer-generated evidence available in the supplied data to confirm product satisfaction, complaint handling, consistency across orders, or after-sales performance. As a result, quality assurance appears supported by process-related tags, but not by buyer feedback.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves credit for having Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status, which are relevant quality safeguards. Nevertheless, the absence of store rating and customer reviews limits confidence in real-world quality performance. The score therefore remains moderate, reflecting a basic quality assurance structure but insufficient customer feedback validation.

Final Score

13 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Hangzhou Paishun Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking rubber, plastic, and silicone hose-related products with customization or ODM requirements. It is especially appropriate for small-to-medium volume procurement, sample development, replacement parts sourcing, and buyers who value platform protection through Trade Assurance.

The supplier’s key strengths are its long 19-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection tag, Full Customization capability, and strong 96.2% on-time delivery rate. These factors make it a credible platform-based sourcing option.

The main risks are the absence of store rating data and 0 customer reviews, which limit independent validation of customer satisfaction and product consistency. Buyers should request samples, inspection reports, technical specifications, and pre-shipment quality confirmation before placing larger orders.

Overall, the supplier shows solid platform credibility and delivery reliability, with moderate production scale and customization potential. Its growth potential is positive if it can accumulate stronger customer feedback and provide more transparent quality documentation.