Jiangsu Yihao Fluorine Plastic Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Jiangsu Yihao Fluorine Plastic Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is a China-based PTFE and fluoroplastic supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 26,000+ m² and 180+ staff. The supplier shows solid manufacturing fundamentals and appears suitable for buyers seeking PTFE raw materials, powders, tubes, and related fluoroplastic products with low MOQ options on several listed items. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and minor customization tags. However, commercial performance data is limited: only 8 orders and CN¥60.8K+ transaction value in the past six months, with no available store rating and 0 reviews. The major procurement concern is delivery performance, as the reported on-time dispatch rate is only 66.7%. Overall, this supplier is more suitable for cautious trial orders, sample development, or technically specified sourcing rather than immediate high-volume, time-critical procurement.
Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis:
- Factory area: 26,000+ m²
- Employees: 180+ staff
- Verified/audited supplier: True
- Product scope includes PTFE materials, powders, tubes, and related fluoroplastic products.
Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a meaningful physical manufacturing base, with a factory size above 26,000 m² and more than 180 staff. This indicates more than a small trading operation and suggests the company has an established production setup for fluoroplastic-related products. The presence of a verified/audited supplier status further strengthens confidence in its operational existence and basic factory capability.
Scoring Rationale:
The company appears to fall into the medium-to-strong manufacturing category. Its factory area and workforce are substantial, but the available data does not include detailed production capacity, annual output, equipment list, or factory certification names. Therefore, it should not be scored as a fully large-scale supply-chain leader, but it clearly exceeds the threshold for a small basic producer.
Final Score: 17/20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified/audited supplier: True
- Certification/platform tags: Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available, Minor customization.
Elaboration:
The supplier has a relatively mature profile, with 7 years of Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support. These are important platform-level credibility indicators for international buyers. The listed platform tags also show that has recorded certain operational and service capabilities, including product inspection and customization support.
Scoring Rationale:
A 7-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status create a strong platform credibility foundation. The certification/tag system is also relatively complete for -based sourcing. However, the provided data does not include named third-party certifications such as ISO, FDA, RoHS, REACH, or other industry-specific compliance documents, so the score should remain slightly below the maximum.
Final Score: 18/20
3. Business Performance
Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 8
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥60.8K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0
Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded platform transaction activity, but the scale is limited. Eight orders over six months and CN¥60.8K+ transaction value show that the supplier has some commercial traction, but not a high-volume transaction record. The lack of store rating and absence of reviews significantly weakens buyer-side validation.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier cannot be considered high-performing from a business-volume perspective based on the provided data. While there is evidence of recent orders and transaction value, the order count is modest, transaction scale is limited, and customer feedback data is missing. This supports a lower-to-mid score rather than a strong commercial performance rating.
Final Score: 11/20
4. Service Capability
Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤5h
- Full Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available
- Minor customization: Available
Elaboration:
The response time of within 5 hours is acceptable for international B2B communication, though it is not at the fastest level. The supplier’s platform tags indicate multiple customization options, including full customization, ODM service, and minor customization, which is valuable for buyers with product-specific requirements.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has stronger-than-basic service capability due to its customization and ODM support. However, since the response time is not within one hour, it does not qualify for the highest service score band. The service profile is suitable for buyers requiring technical adaptation or customized specifications, provided communication expectations are managed.
Final Score: 8/10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis:
- On-time dispatch rate: 66.7%
Elaboration:
Delivery reliability is the supplier’s weakest reported area. A 66.7% on-time dispatch rate means roughly one-third of recorded shipments may not have been dispatched on time, based on the provided metric. For buyers with strict project timelines, production schedules, or downstream delivery commitments, this is a material procurement risk.
Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate below 70% should receive fewer than 5 points. Since the supplier’s rate is 66.7%, it falls clearly below the acceptable threshold for stable delivery performance.
Final Score: 4/10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis:
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified/audited supplier: True
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0
Elaboration:
The supplier has some quality-related safeguards, especially the Finished Product Inspection tag and verified/audited supplier status. These indicators suggest a basic quality control framework is present. However, there is no available store rating and no customer reviews, which limits the ability to assess real buyer satisfaction, complaint history, consistency, or post-delivery quality performance.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier should receive credit for having Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status, but the absence of rating and review data prevents a strong quality-feedback score. The quality assurance structure appears basic to moderate, while customer validation is insufficient.
Final Score: 12/20
Total Score
70/100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Jiangsu Yihao Fluorine Plastic Manufacturing Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking PTFE and fluoroplastic materials with customization or ODM needs, especially for sample orders, trial procurement, or non-urgent sourcing projects. The supplier has solid company scale and strong platform credibility, but buyers should proceed cautiously due to limited transaction volume, 0 reviews, missing store rating, and a low 66.7% on-time dispatch rate. The main risks are delivery reliability and insufficient customer feedback validation. Its growth potential is moderate if delivery performance improves and more verified customer feedback becomes available.
Leave your comment