zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Yihao Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Yihao Technology (foshan) Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based Chinese supplier focused on ice bath and chiller-related products, including OEM ice bath units, spa cold plunge chillers, WiFi rapid cooling models, and commercial chiller products. The company reports a factory area of 1,100+㎡ and 90+ staff, indicating a small-to-medium manufacturing scale with basic production capacity. It is marked as a verified/audited supplier and has Gold Supplier status for 3 years, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, and Full Customization capability. Business performance appears moderate, with 70+ orders and CN¥1.8M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating but only 10+ reviews. Delivery performance is acceptable but not excellent, with an 88.2% on-time shipping rate. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ, customized ice bath/chiller products, and moderate-volume procurement, while larger buyers should further verify production capacity and delivery stability.

Yihao Technology (foshan) Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Final Score: 14 / 20

Basis

  • Company name: Yihao Technology (foshan) Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 1,100+㎡
  • Employees: 90+ staff
  • Verified/audited supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area of over 1,100 square meters and more than 90 employees. This suggests that the company has an established operational base and a defined workforce, rather than being a purely trading-oriented or very small workshop-style supplier. The presence of a verified/audited supplier status provides additional credibility regarding its operational existence and basic factory capability.

However, the factory size is not large compared with large-scale industrial manufacturers, and the employee count indicates a small-to-medium production organization. The available data does not include details such as annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment list, factory ownership, R&D team size, or capacity utilization rate. Therefore, while the supplier demonstrates basic and stable production capability, there is insufficient data to classify it as a large-scale supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 14 is appropriate because the supplier has measurable factory infrastructure, a workforce of 90+ staff, and verified/audited supplier status. These factors support a medium-level manufacturing capability. However, the factory area of 1,100+㎡ is relatively modest, and the lack of disclosed production capacity, equipment details, and factory certification information limits confidence in large-volume scalability. The supplier fits the lower end of the “medium stable factory” range rather than the high end.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Final Score: 16 / 20

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified/audited supplier: True
  • Certification/industry tags:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available
  • Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a solid platform credibility profile. It has been an Gold Supplier for 3 years and supports Trade Assurance, which provides a basic transaction protection framework for buyers using the platform. The verified/audited supplier status further strengthens platform-level trust.

The supplier also displays several useful platform tags, including warranty availability, finished product inspection, ODM service, and full customization. These tags suggest that the supplier is positioned to support customized product requirements and has at least some inspection-related quality control process. However, the data does not include internationally recognized certifications, specific factory audit reports, ISO certification, product safety certifications, or compliance documents. Therefore, its compliance credibility is good at platform level but not fully substantiated from a broader certification perspective.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives 16 points because its core platform credibility indicators are present: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified/audited status, and relevant service/inspection tags. The 3-year Gold Supplier period is credible but not long enough to be considered a long-term platform history. In addition, the absence of detailed third-party certification data prevents a higher score. The supplier fits the “core certifications complete but tenure relatively short” category.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Final Score: 16 / 20

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 70+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.8M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Review count: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier shows a reasonable level of commercial activity on the platform. Over the past six months, it has received more than 70 orders and achieved more than CN¥1.8 million in transaction value. This indicates that the supplier is not inactive and has recent buyer engagement.

The store rating of 4.9 is strong and suggests positive buyer satisfaction among available reviewers. However, the number of reviews is only 10+, which is relatively limited. This means the high rating should be interpreted with some caution, as the sample size is not large enough to provide a fully mature picture of long-term customer satisfaction. The transaction value is meaningful, but the available data does not show order distribution, repeat buyer ratio, major customer types, or historical growth trend.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 16 reflects stable medium-scale business performance. The supplier has a healthy transaction value and order count for the recent six-month period, and its rating is strong. However, the relatively low review count limits the depth of commercial validation. The supplier appears commercially active and reasonably proven, but not yet at the level of a highly validated high-volume supplier with extensive review history.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Final Score: 7 / 10

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤7h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier supports Full Customization and ODM service, which indicates flexibility in product adaptation and buyer-specific requirements. This is valuable for buyers sourcing ice bath or chiller products that may require branding, specification adjustment, or customized configurations.

The reported communication response time is within 7 hours. This is acceptable for ordinary international sourcing communication, but it is not at the highest level of responsiveness. According to the scoring framework, the strongest service capability would require response time within one hour combined with strong customization capability. This supplier has customization capability but does not meet the top response-speed threshold.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives 7 points because it offers meaningful customization support through Full Customization and ODM service, which strengthens its service profile. However, the response time of ≤7h is moderate rather than highly responsive. This places the supplier in the normal service capability range rather than the premium service tier.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Final Score: 8 / 10

Basis

  • On-time shipping rate: 88.2%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time shipping rate is 88.2%, which falls within the 80% to 89% range. This indicates acceptable but not excellent delivery reliability. For buyers with flexible timelines or moderate urgency, this performance may be workable. However, for buyers requiring strict launch schedules, seasonal inventory planning, or tightly controlled delivery windows, the current on-time rate may represent a manageable but important risk.

The data does not include average lead time, production cycle, logistics method, historical delay reasons, or order-size-based delivery performance. Therefore, the assessment is limited strictly to the provided on-time shipment rate.

Scoring Rationale

Based on the defined scoring standard, an on-time shipping rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. The supplier’s 88.2% is close to the upper end of this band, so 8 points is justified. It is below the 90% threshold required for the highest delivery performance range.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Final Score: 16 / 20

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Review count: 10+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified/audited supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive indicator of buyer satisfaction. It also has Finished Product Inspection listed, suggesting that some level of inspection is available before shipment. Warranty availability further supports the supplier’s quality service positioning, while verified/audited supplier status adds credibility to its operational profile.

However, the review count is only 10+, which is relatively limited. A high rating based on a smaller number of reviews provides less statistical confidence than a similar rating supported by hundreds of customer evaluations. In addition, the data does not provide specific quality certifications, inspection standards, defect rates, return rates, product test reports, or customer complaint records. Therefore, quality confidence is positive but not fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns 16 points because it combines a strong rating, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified/audited supplier status. These are meaningful quality assurance indicators. Nevertheless, the limited number of reviews and lack of detailed quality documentation prevent the score from reaching the top range. The supplier appears to have a solid basic quality framework, but more data would be needed for high-confidence large-scale procurement decisions.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 8 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Yihao Technology (foshan) Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking ice bath and chiller-related products with low MOQ flexibility, customization options, ODM service, and platform-backed transaction protection. The supplier is particularly appropriate for small-to-medium buyers, trial orders, customized product sourcing, and moderate-volume procurement where Trade Assurance and finished product inspection can be used to reduce sourcing risk.

Key strengths include:
- Verified/audited supplier status
- 3-year Gold Supplier history
- Trade Assurance support
- Full Customization and ODM service availability
- 4.9 store rating
- CN¥1.8M+ transaction value over the past six months
- Low MOQ of 1 unit across listed products

Main risks include:
- Factory scale is moderate, not large
- Review count is limited at 10+
- On-time shipping rate is 88.2%, below the 90% top-tier benchmark
- No detailed data on production capacity, equipment, international certifications, product test reports, or defect rates
- Response time of ≤7h is acceptable but not highly responsive

Growth potential:
The supplier shows growth potential due to its active transaction record, customization capability, and platform credibility. If it improves delivery reliability, accumulates more customer reviews, and provides more detailed certification or factory capacity documentation, it could become a stronger candidate for higher-volume or longer-term procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dongguan Humen Yihao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Humen Yihao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yihao Fluorine Plastic Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yihao Fluorine Plastic Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Zhiguangno Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Zhiguangno Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Xiaotian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Xiaotian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Lisheng Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Lisheng Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kawa Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kawa Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Carfu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Carfu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kindle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kindle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sunton Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sunton Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jinjian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jinjian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Zhongfeixin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Zhongfeixin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qituo Lubrication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qituo Lubrication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jitian Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jitian Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huanhua Resources Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huanhua Resources Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pengxin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pengxin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shengwei Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shengwei Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yisihang Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yisihang Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Litai Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Litai Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shaanxi Xinshengtai Environment Engineering Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Xinshengtai Environment Engineering Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Fashion Business Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Fashion Business Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Docan Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Docan Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huaqi Sealing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huaqi Sealing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jackbond Electromechanical Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jackbond Electromechanical Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Heze Raycrown Hats Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Heze Raycrown Hats Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Langri Heating And Cooling Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Langri Heating And Cooling Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Huazhong Power Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Huazhong Power Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Tongxing Construction Equipment Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Tongxing Construction Equipment Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Yuxuan Technologies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Yuxuan Technologies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fupower Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fupower Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cnrm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cnrm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Xiangtai Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Xiangtai Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Hongshi Machinery Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Hongshi Machinery Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Hengliyou Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Hengliyou Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yichuang Hat And Bag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yichuang Hat And Bag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Lantai Paper Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Lantai Paper Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Oone International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Oone International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongya Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongya Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Kunteng Machinery Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Kunteng Machinery Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026