zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Foshan Zhongfeixin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

11.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Foshan Zhongfeixin Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 4,900+ m2 and 70+ staff. Its product data indicates a focus on window, balcony, pulley wheel, nylon wheel, stainless steel coated window component, and carbon steel precision-related products, with MOQ levels ranging from 1,000 to 10,000 pieces. The supplier shows solid platform credibility through 10 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and listed capability tags including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and Warranty available. Business performance is moderate, with 30+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is excellent at 5.0, but the review count is limited to 4, which restricts the depth of customer feedback validation. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale, cost-sensitive component sourcing with customization needs, while larger buyers should further verify production capacity, quality records, and order scalability.

Detailed Analysis

Foshan Zhongfeixin Technology Co., Ltd.

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 4,900+ m2
- Employees: 70+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes pulley wheels, sliding balcony wheels, window components, and carbon steel precision products.

Elaboration
The supplier has a moderate physical production base, with nearly 5,000 m2 of factory area and over 70 staff. This indicates more than a very small workshop-level operation, but the available data does not support classification as a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The product range suggests specialization in window, balcony, pulley, nylon wheel, and related hardware/component categories. The presence of verified supplier status improves confidence in the company’s operational legitimacy, but no detailed factory audit report, production line count, annual capacity, machinery list, or formal manufacturing certifications are provided.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates a stable medium-sized manufacturing profile. Its factory size and staff count support basic to mid-level production capability, and verified supplier status adds credibility. However, the available data does not show large-scale capacity indicators such as extensive workforce, large factory area, multiple production bases, or named factory certifications. Therefore, the score fits the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale supply chain range.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 10 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, Full customization, ODM service available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 10-year Gold Supplier history is a significant positive indicator for platform continuity. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with an added transaction protection mechanism. The listed tags show several commercial and compliance-related capabilities, including warranty availability and finished product inspection. Full customization and ODM service availability also support sourcing flexibility. However, the data does not provide named third-party certifications such as ISO, product safety certificates, or detailed audit documentation, so compliance depth beyond platform-level verification remains Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets several major credibility indicators: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple capability tags. The 10-year duration is particularly strong and supports long-term platform reliability. The main limitation is the absence of specific formal certification names or detailed verification documents. As a result, the supplier deserves a high score, though not a perfect score.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 30+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 4

Elaboration
The supplier has visible recent transaction activity, with more than 30 orders and over CN¥270.4K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active commercial operation and some degree of market acceptance on the platform. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review base is very small at only 4 reviews. This limits the reliability of the rating as a broad customer satisfaction indicator. The order count and transaction value are meaningful but do not indicate high-volume platform dominance.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows moderate business performance. The 30+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value suggest stable but not exceptionally high transaction volume. A 5.0 rating supports customer satisfaction, but the low review count reduces confidence in the rating’s statistical strength. The score therefore falls in the stable medium transaction range rather than the high-order, high-review, high-transaction category.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤5h
- Full customization: listed as available
- ODM service: listed as available

Elaboration
The supplier provides a response time of no more than 5 hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication but does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service is a positive indicator for buyers requiring tailored products, private specifications, or design-based production support. However, there is no data on quotation speed, sample lead time, engineering support, multilingual service, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has clear customization capability and reasonable communication responsiveness. Because the response time is ≤5h rather than ≤1h, it does not qualify for the highest service capability range. Still, Full Customization and ODM availability make the supplier suitable for buyers with specification-based sourcing requirements. The score reflects normal-to-good service capability with some limitations in available service detail.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 95.0%

Elaboration
The reported on-time delivery rate of 95.0% is strong and exceeds the 90% benchmark for high delivery reliability. This suggests that the supplier has been able to fulfill platform orders within agreed delivery timelines. However, the data does not include shipment volume, average lead time, logistics methods, delay reasons, or performance consistency across larger orders.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the provided on-time delivery rate, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance range. A 95.0% rate indicates reliable fulfillment performance. The score is high, but not perfect, because supporting details such as order complexity, batch size, and historical delivery trend are not provided.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 4
- Finished product inspection: listed as available
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: listed
- Factory verification / detailed quality certification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status and listed inspection tag

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the rating is based on only 4 reviews. This means customer feedback is favorable but limited in sample size. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and Warranty available tags improves the quality assurance profile. Verified supplier status also supports baseline credibility. However, the data does not include defect rates, inspection standards, QC staffing, test reports, product certificates, or detailed third-party factory audit results.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows good quality-related indicators through finished product inspection, warranty availability, verified supplier status, and a 5.0 rating. The major weakness is the very small number of reviews, which limits confidence in broad customer satisfaction. Because the quality system appears present but not fully documented, the score fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance” range rather than the highest category.

Final Score
16 / 20

Total Score

83 / 100

  • Company Strength: 16 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
  • Business Performance: 15 / 20
  • Service Capability: 8 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order validation.

Foshan Zhongfeixin Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for small to mid-sized buyers, distributors, window and balcony hardware purchasers, and buyers requiring customized pulley wheel or related component products. Its strongest advantages are long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, Full Customization availability, Finished Product Inspection, and a strong 95.0% on-time delivery rate.

The main risks are limited customer review depth, moderate transaction volume, and insufficient data on formal factory certifications, detailed production capacity, QC procedures, machinery, and large-order fulfillment capability. For first-time procurement, buyers should request samples, confirm material specifications, inspection standards, packaging requirements, lead time, and warranty terms before placing larger orders.

The supplier has growth potential as a mid-scale specialized component supplier, especially for buyers seeking customization and stable platform-backed transactions. However, large-volume or high-compliance buyers should conduct additional factory verification and quality documentation review before strategic cooperation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Foshan Zhiguangno Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Zhiguangno Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yihao Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yihao Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Xiaotian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Xiaotian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Lisheng Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Lisheng Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kawa Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kawa Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Carfu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Carfu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kindle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kindle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sunton Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sunton Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jinjian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jinjian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qituo Lubrication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qituo Lubrication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jitian Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jitian Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huanhua Resources Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huanhua Resources Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pengxin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pengxin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shengwei Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shengwei Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yisihang Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yisihang Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kufan Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kufan Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Xincode Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Xincode Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xinyishun Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xinyishun Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangzhou Yupeng Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yupeng Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zonegoing Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zonegoing Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Engineering Plastics Industries (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Engineering Plastics Industries (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Faqi Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Faqi Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Fujiheng Power Machinery Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Fujiheng Power Machinery Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Kst Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kst Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Top Oil Purifier Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Top Oil Purifier Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Bentensh Environmental Protection Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Bentensh Environmental Protection Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cida (Guangzhou) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cida (Guangzhou) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Songmao Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Songmao Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Singokin Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Singokin Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Jetters Home Furnishings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Jetters Home Furnishings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Winstar Electrical Enterprise Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Winstar Electrical Enterprise Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Vital Green Health Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Vital Green Health Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianlv Scarf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianlv Scarf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Inner Mongolia Xuanda Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Inner Mongolia Xuanda Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hongjie International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hongjie International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Small-Bridge Crystal Handicrafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Small-Bridge Crystal Handicrafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huapu Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huapu Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jielong Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jielong Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026