zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Foshan Sunton Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Foshan Sunton Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering glass mosaic and decorative glass mural products, including swimming pool glass mosaic tiles, patterned wall mural craft glass, irregular art glass mosaic, customized flower glass mosaic, and bathroom glass flower mural products. The supplier shows a credible platform profile, with 5 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and listed service/quality tags such as ODM service available, Finished Product Inspection, Project solutions, and On-site installation. Business activity appears moderate, with 10+ orders and CN¥608.5K+ transaction value over the past six months, but the very limited review count of 2 reduces confidence in customer feedback depth. Key limitations include missing factory area and employee count data, which restrict assessment of production scale, and a low on-time dispatch rate of 37.5%, which represents a significant delivery risk. This supplier may be suitable for buyers prioritizing customized mosaic or decorative glass products, but delivery performance requires careful verification before bulk procurement.

Foshan Sunton Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Company name: Foshan Sunton Technology Co., Ltd.
- Country/region: China, Guangdong Province
- Factory area: Insufficient Data
- Number of employees: Insufficient Data
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes glass mosaic pool tiles, art glass mosaics, glass murals, and customized flower glass mosaic products.

Elaboration
The supplier has a verified supplier status, which provides some confidence that the business has undergone a platform-level verification process. Its listed product range suggests specialization in glass mosaic and decorative glass applications, including pool, bathroom, wall mural, and customized artistic mosaic products. However, key indicators of manufacturing capacity, such as factory size and workforce scale, are not provided. Without factory area or employee count, it is not possible to determine whether the supplier operates as a large-scale manufacturer, mid-sized factory, or smaller production unit.

Scoring Rationale
The verified supplier status supports a basic level of operational credibility, and the product portfolio indicates a focused supply category. However, the absence of factory area and employee data significantly limits the ability to evaluate production scale, capacity stability, or ability to handle large-volume orders. Therefore, the company cannot be scored as a large or clearly mid-sized stable factory based on the available data. A moderate score is appropriate because there is verified supplier backing, but production scale remains insufficiently evidenced.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry labels: Project solutions, ODM service available, Finished product inspection, On-site installation

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively strong platform credibility profile. A 5-year Gold Supplier history indicates an established presence on rather than a newly created supplier profile. Trade Assurance support adds transactional protection for buyers, while verified supplier status improves trust in the supplier’s business identity and platform compliance. The presence of labels such as Finished product inspection and ODM service available further supports the supplier’s credibility in quality handling and customization-related service capability.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets several important platform credibility indicators: Gold Supplier status, 5-year operating history on the platform, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple relevant service/quality tags. While the provided data does not specify detailed factory audit documents or third-party certification names beyond the listed platform tags, the available compliance indicators are relatively complete for -based sourcing evaluation. This supports a high score, though not the maximum due to limited detail on formal factory audit scope or independent certifications.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥608.5K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded commercial activity over the past six months, with more than 10 orders and transaction value above CN¥608.5K. This suggests actual buyer engagement and some level of market validation. The store rating of 5.0 is positive, but the review count is only 2, which makes the rating statistically weak. A small number of reviews means the score may not fully represent broad customer experience across multiple buyers or order types.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction value is meaningful and indicates that the supplier has completed orders with measurable commercial volume. However, the order count of 10+ is not high, and only 2 reviews provide limited customer feedback evidence. The supplier therefore shows moderate business performance rather than strong, high-volume market validation. The 5.0 rating is favorable, but its reliability is constrained by the low number of reviews.

Final Score
14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤4h
- ODM service available: Listed under platform certification/industry labels
- Project solutions: Listed
- On-site installation: Listed
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the highest standard of within 1 hour. The ODM service available tag suggests the supplier can support design or product development needs to some extent. Project solutions and on-site installation labels also indicate service orientation beyond basic product sales. However, the data does not explicitly state Full Customization support, so customization strength cannot be rated at the highest level.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates a reasonable service profile through ≤4h response time, ODM service availability, project solutions, and on-site installation. These are positive for buyers requiring decorative glass or project-based mosaic applications. However, response speed is not at the fastest level, and Full Customization is not confirmed in the provided data. Therefore, the supplier fits the “normal response and basic customization capability” range rather than the top service tier.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 37.5%

Elaboration
The reported on-time dispatch rate is significantly low. At 37.5%, the supplier’s delivery reliability is well below the 70% threshold. This is a critical concern for buyers with fixed project schedules, installation timelines, seasonal demand, or strict inventory planning requirements. Even if the supplier has acceptable product and platform credentials, poor dispatch performance can create procurement risk.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, delivery rates below 70% should receive fewer than 5 points. A 37.5% on-time dispatch rate indicates substantial delivery inconsistency. This is the weakest area in the supplier profile and should be treated as a major operational risk before placing bulk or time-sensitive orders.

Final Score
3 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect listed store rating of 5.0, and Finished Product Inspection is included among its platform labels, which supports the existence of some quality control process. Verified supplier status also adds credibility. However, the review count is very limited at only 2, so the available customer feedback base is not broad enough to strongly confirm consistent quality performance. Factory Verification is not explicitly provided, so this element must be treated as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has positive quality indicators, especially the 5.0 rating and Finished Product Inspection label. However, the low review count restricts confidence in customer satisfaction consistency. Since Factory Verification is not clearly stated and customer feedback volume is very small, the supplier cannot be scored in the highest quality tier. A mid-level score is justified because the available quality signals are positive but not yet strongly validated by sufficient buyer feedback.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 68 / 100

  • Company Strength: 12 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
  • Business Performance: 14 / 20
  • Service Capability: 7 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 3 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 14 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Foshan Sunton Technology Co., Ltd. can be considered a conditionally recommended supplier for buyers sourcing glass mosaic tiles, decorative glass murals, and art glass mosaic products, especially where Trade Assurance, ODM service availability, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status are important procurement filters.

The supplier appears more suitable for small to medium-sized project buyers, decorative material distributors, renovation contractors, and buyers seeking customized or project-oriented glass mosaic products. However, it is not recommended for urgent, time-sensitive, or large-scale procurement without additional delivery verification.

Main risk points include insufficient data on factory area and employee count, very limited customer review volume, unclear Factory Verification status, and especially the low 37.5% on-time dispatch rate. Before cooperation, buyers should request updated production capacity information, delivery lead time commitments, quality inspection procedures, and recent order fulfillment records.

Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s 5-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, CN¥608.5K+ recent transaction value, and service-related labels such as ODM service, project solutions, and on-site installation. However, delivery reliability must improve before the supplier can be considered a strong long-term procurement partner.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Tianjin Sunton Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Sunton Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Zhiguangno Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Zhiguangno Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yihao Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yihao Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Xiaotian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Xiaotian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Lisheng Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Lisheng Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kawa Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kawa Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Carfu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Carfu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kindle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kindle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jinjian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jinjian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Zhongfeixin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Zhongfeixin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qituo Lubrication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qituo Lubrication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jitian Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jitian Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pinheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huanhua Resources Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huanhua Resources Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pengxin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Pengxin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shengwei Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shengwei Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yisihang Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yisihang Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kufan Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kufan Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinhongfa Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinhongfa Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Locat Intelligent Equipment (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Locat Intelligent Equipment (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Mecalo Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Mecalo Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Masin International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Masin International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Yfy Chemical & Plastics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Yfy Chemical & Plastics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Kunyu Juyixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Kunyu Juyixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meifei Building Materials (Hebei) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meifei Building Materials (Hebei) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Zhongda Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Zhongda Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Techgong (Shanghai) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Techgong (Shanghai) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jianning Metals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jianning Metals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Becoan Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Becoan Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cammi House International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cammi House International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Rinntin Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Rinntin Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Prima Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Prima Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Freefly Paper Packaging Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Freefly Paper Packaging Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Gongyi Xiaoyi Mingyang Machinery Plant Supplier Evaluation
Gongyi Xiaoyi Mingyang Machinery Plant Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hym Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hym Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Chemlead New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Chemlead New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Getogether Sujiao Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Getogether Sujiao Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiahao Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiahao Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026