zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Suzhou Getogether Sujiao Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Suzhou Getogether Sujiao Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, offering customized car diffuser stones, perfume bottles, and air freshener bottles with low to moderate MOQ levels ranging from 50 to 1,000 pieces. The company shows strong platform credibility, with 12 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and listed service/quality tags including low MOQ customization and finished product inspection. Its recent commercial performance is solid, with 400+ orders and CN¥2.6M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 80+ reviews. Operationally, the company appears more suitable for small to medium buyers, promotional product buyers, private-label fragrance accessory brands, and customers requiring flexible customization rather than very large-scale industrial procurement. Key strengths include platform maturity, good delivery reliability, and proven transaction activity, while the main limitation is its relatively small factory scale based on the provided area and staffing data.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier is located in Jiangsu, China, with a reported factory area of 490+ m² and 30+ staff. The data also indicates that it is a verified factory supplier.

Elaboration:
The company has a physical manufacturing base and a staff size sufficient for basic production and customization-related operations. However, the reported factory area of 490+ m² and 30+ employees indicates a relatively small-scale operation rather than a large industrial manufacturing facility. The verified supplier/factory status adds credibility to the existence and operational legitimacy of the business, but the provided data does not show large-scale production capacity, multiple production lines, advanced equipment, or large workforce depth.

Scoring Rationale:
Given the small factory footprint and modest employee count, the supplier should not be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain provider. At the same time, the presence of factory verification and active product offerings suggests that it has basic production capability and is not merely a trading profile with insufficient operational evidence. The score therefore fits the “small but with basic production capability” range.

Final Score: 12/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is listed as an Gold Supplier for 12 years, supports Trade Assurance, is marked as a verified supplier, and carries platform/industry tags including “Low MOQ for customization,” “Finished product inspection,” and “Response time ≤2h.”

Elaboration:
A 12-year Gold Supplier history represents strong platform continuity and a long-standing presence on . Trade Assurance provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers. The verified supplier status and listed tags improve buyer confidence by showing that the platform has recognized certain service and inspection-related capabilities. The available data does not include external certifications such as ISO, BSCI, or product-specific compliance certificates, so the assessment is limited to platform-based credibility.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates a complete and mature credibility profile: long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, factory/supplier verification, and relevant operational tags. Although no third-party management or product compliance certifications are provided, the platform-side credibility is strong and long established. This justifies a high score within the 18–20 range, while leaving a small deduction for missing broader certification data.

Final Score: 18/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
The supplier recorded 400+ orders and CN¥2.6M+ transaction value in the past six months. The store rating is 4.7, with 80+ reviews.

Elaboration:
The recent six-month order count indicates active commercial traction on the platform. CN¥2.6M+ in transaction value reflects meaningful sales activity rather than minimal or occasional transactions. A 4.7 rating suggests generally positive customer satisfaction, while 80+ reviews provide a reasonable feedback base. However, the review volume is not exceptionally large, and the rating, while good, is not at the highest level.

Scoring Rationale:
The business data supports a stable and commercially validated supplier profile. The 400+ recent orders and CN¥2.6M+ transaction value indicate stronger-than-basic market acceptance. The 4.7 rating and 80+ reviews reinforce buyer confidence, though they do not reach the level of a very high-volume, top-rated supplier with extensive review depth. Therefore, the supplier fits the upper end of stable medium-scale transaction performance.

Final Score: 17/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
The listed communication response time is ≤2h. Platform tags include “Low MOQ for customization.” Product titles also indicate custom brand logo and customized perfume/air freshener bottle offerings.

Elaboration:
A response time of within two hours indicates reasonably efficient communication, though it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of within one hour. The low MOQ customization tag and product listings with custom branding suggest that the supplier supports customization-oriented orders. The MOQ range, including 50 pieces and 100 pieces for several items, is favorable for buyers testing customized products or running small promotional batches. However, the provided data does not explicitly state “Full Customization,” so full-scope customization capability cannot be confirmed.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows practical service capability through fast response and low-MOQ customization support. Since the response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, and because full customization is not explicitly confirmed, the score should not reach the 9–10 range. It is best assessed as responsive with customization support at a solid but not maximum level.

Final Score: 8/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 95.7%.

Elaboration:
A 95.7% on-time shipping rate is a strong indicator of delivery reliability. This performance level exceeds the 90% threshold and suggests that the supplier is generally capable of meeting agreed dispatch schedules. For buyers managing replenishment, promotional campaigns, or seasonal product launches, this delivery record is a meaningful operational advantage.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 95.7%, the supplier clearly meets the high-performance range. A minor deduction is retained because the data only provides the percentage and does not include order complexity, lead-time consistency by product type, or late-shipment root causes.

Final Score: 9/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
The supplier has a 4.7 store rating, 80+ reviews, a “Finished product inspection” tag, and verified supplier/factory status.

Elaboration:
The 4.7 rating indicates generally favorable customer feedback, and 80+ reviews offer a moderate level of evidence from past buyers. The finished product inspection tag is an important quality-control indicator, suggesting that goods are inspected before shipment. Verified supplier/factory status also supports confidence in the supplier’s operational transparency. However, the review count is not very large, and the provided data does not include defect rates, inspection reports, product certificates, or detailed customer complaint history.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a good quality-feedback profile supported by both customer rating and platform quality tags. The combination of a 4.7 rating, 80+ reviews, finished product inspection, and verification justifies a score in the good-quality range. It does not reach the highest band because review volume is moderate and no additional quality system certifications or inspection performance metrics are provided.

Final Score: 16/20

Total Score

Company Strength: 12/20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18/20
Business Performance: 17/20
Service Capability: 8/10
Delivery Performance: 9/10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 16/20

Total Score: 80/100

Procurement Recommendation

Suzhou Getogether Sujiao Co., Ltd. is recommended for cooperation, especially for small to medium-sized buyers seeking customized car air fresheners, diffuser stones, perfume bottles, promotional fragrance products, or private-label low-MOQ orders. The supplier’s strongest advantages are its 12-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified status, active recent transaction record, low-MOQ customization positioning, finished product inspection tag, and strong 95.7% on-time delivery rate.

The main procurement risks are related to scale and information completeness. The reported factory area of 490+ m² and 30+ staff indicate limited production scale, so buyers with very large-volume or highly time-sensitive mass production requirements should verify capacity before placing major orders. In addition, no external product compliance certificates, quality system certifications, or detailed inspection reports are provided in the dataset, so compliance-sensitive buyers should request supporting documents before purchase.

Overall, the supplier has good growth potential in flexible customization, promotional products, and small-to-medium private-label fragrance accessories. A trial order or phased procurement approach is advisable before scaling to larger recurring orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Suzhou Guanhua Paper Factory Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Guanhua Paper Factory Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Youzhuyuan Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Youzhuyuan Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Xinhuilun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Xinhuilun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Minghuiyuan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Minghuiyuan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Tengda Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Tengda Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zhijie Advertising Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zhijie Advertising Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zhongmaozhu Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zhongmaozhu Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jacket Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jacket Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Nuotai Fashion Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Nuotai Fashion Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Huijin Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Huijin Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kare Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kare Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Puretal Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Puretal Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kvc Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kvc Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Nanovela Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Nanovela Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kd Elevater Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kd Elevater Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hicen Tools (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hicen Tools (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Leaders Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Leaders Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Forst Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Forst Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Unity 4Wd Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Unity 4Wd Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shaanxi Enze Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Enze Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ouyou Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ouyou Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chunwang Import&Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chunwang Import&Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tuton Textile (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tuton Textile (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jinhua New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jinhua New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Flt Chain Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Flt Chain Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Nan Yun Packing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Nan Yun Packing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Flanne Water Purification Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Flanne Water Purification Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Hongda Phytochemistry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Hongda Phytochemistry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Fuxin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Fuxin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Danq Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Danq Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Laihong Bicycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Laihong Bicycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Everyoung Metals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Everyoung Metals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Youshilihui Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Youshilihui Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Longze Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Longze Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qiandu Automobile Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qiandu Automobile Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Lingge Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Lingge Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fresh Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fresh Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Jingzhi Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Jingzhi Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026