Sichuan Youshilihui Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Sichuan Youshilihui Food Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based food manufacturer located in Sichuan, with a reported factory area of over 60,000㎡ and more than 150 staff. The supplier presents a relatively strong production foundation for canned food products, including canned pork luncheon meat, canned minced pork, and canned braised peanuts. It is listed as a verified supplier and holds Gold Supplier status for 1 year. The supplier also shows relevant capability tags such as Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service availability, and OEM for well-known brands. However, the platform profile lacks Trade Assurance support, and key business validation data—such as six-month order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer review history—is either missing or shows zero reviews. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking factory-direct canned food sourcing with customization needs, but commercial credibility and customer feedback should be further verified before large-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Sichuan, China
• Factory area: 60,000+㎡
• Employees: 150+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope provided: canned pork luncheon meat, canned minced pork, canned braised peanuts

Elaboration

The supplier reports a sizable factory footprint of more than 60,000㎡, which indicates a substantial physical production base. The workforce of over 150 staff suggests an organized manufacturing operation with capacity beyond a small workshop level. The presence of multiple canned food SKUs also indicates the supplier is not limited to a single product format, but the available data does not provide detailed annual capacity, production lines, export volume, or factory audit reports.

The “Verified Supplier” status supports the credibility of the company’s basic profile, although no specific third-party factory audit report or food safety certification is provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates strong physical scale and a verified supplier status, which supports a high score in this dimension. However, the lack of detailed production capacity figures, certification documents, or audit scope prevents assigning a near-perfect score. The supplier appears to be a medium-to-large manufacturing operation with stable basic production capability.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: False
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• OEM for well-known brands
• Finished product inspection
• Full customization
• ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has Gold Supplier status, but the duration is only 1 year, which means the platform history is relatively short. The supplier is also marked as verified, which adds credibility to the profile. The listed capability tags show that the supplier claims to support OEM, ODM, finished product inspection, and full customization.

However, Trade Assurance is not supported according to the provided data. This is a notable limitation because Trade Assurance usually provides buyers with additional transactional protection on . In addition, no detailed compliance certificates, food safety certifications, export licenses, or internationally recognized quality system certifications are included in the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic platform credibility through Gold Supplier and verified supplier status, but the short Gold Supplier history and absence of Trade Assurance reduce the confidence level. The profile contains useful capability tags, yet the compliance documentation is not complete enough to classify the supplier as highly credible from a procurement risk-control perspective.

Final Score

14 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Past 6 months order volume: Insufficient Data
• Past 6 months transaction amount: Insufficient Data
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The business performance data is largely unavailable. There is no disclosed order volume or transaction value for the past six months, and no store rating is provided. The review count is listed as 0, meaning there is no visible customer feedback record in the supplied data.

This lack of transaction and review evidence makes it difficult to confirm actual commercial activity, repeat buyer trust, or buyer satisfaction through platform-based performance indicators.

Scoring Rationale

Although the company appears to have a meaningful production base, business performance must be scored based on transaction validation, order history, ratings, and reviews. Since these indicators are missing or unavailable, the supplier cannot be considered commercially well-validated on the platform. The absence of reviews is a significant limitation for procurement decision-making.

Final Score

6 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Full Customization: Listed
• ODM service available: Listed
• OEM for well-known brands: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported response time is within 4 hours, which indicates acceptable communication responsiveness, though it does not reach the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service tags suggests that the supplier can support customized product development or private-label requirements.

The data also includes an OEM-related tag, but no specific customer names, project cases, customization lead times, R&D team size, or packaging customization details are provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid service capability due to acceptable response speed and stated customization support. However, the response time is not at the fastest level, and the lack of detailed customization case evidence prevents assigning the highest score.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Based on the provided scoring standard, any supplier with an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the highest delivery performance range.

However, the data does not include the number of orders used to calculate this rate. Therefore, while the percentage is excellent, the statistical reliability cannot be fully assessed without order volume data.

Scoring Rationale

The on-time delivery rate meets the top performance threshold. Despite the absence of supporting order-count context, the provided delivery metric itself is strong and justifies a high score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Listed
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory Verification: Insufficient Data
• Trade Assurance: False

Elaboration

The supplier lists Finished Product Inspection as one of its capability tags, which is a positive quality-control indicator. The verified supplier status also provides some baseline confidence in the company profile. However, there is no customer rating, and the number of reviews is 0, meaning there is no direct buyer feedback available in the provided data.

No specific food safety certificates, inspection reports, factory audit certificates, or quality management system certifications are included. For canned food products, quality assurance is especially important, but the provided data is not sufficient to confirm the depth or consistency of the supplier’s quality-control system.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has some basic quality-related indicators, especially Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. However, the absence of store rating, customer reviews, and detailed quality certifications significantly limits quality confidence. The score reflects basic quality-control visibility but weak customer feedback validation.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Sichuan Youshilihui Food Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking a factory-based canned food supplier with a sizable production site, acceptable service response, customization capability, and strong reported delivery performance. The supplier may be appropriate for importers, private-label buyers, distributors, or food product buyers looking for canned pork luncheon meat, canned minced pork, or canned braised peanut products.

However, large-volume procurement should not proceed without further verification. The main risks are the absence of Trade Assurance, short Gold Supplier history of only 1 year, missing six-month transaction data, missing store rating, and zero customer reviews. Quality confidence is also limited because detailed food safety certifications and inspection documentation are not provided.

The supplier shows growth potential due to its factory scale, customization capability, and 100% reported on-time delivery rate. A prudent sourcing approach would be to request product samples, quality documents, production certificates, factory audit materials, and references before confirming bulk orders.