zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Jiangxi Yufresh Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Jiangxi Yufresh Food Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based food ingredient supplier located in Jiangxi, with a reported factory area of 2,100+ m² and 130+ staff. The company offers products including soft ice cream powder, ice cream mix, high-fat powder, yoghurt starter powder, and sachet-format food products, with MOQ levels ranging from 50 boxes to 1 ton depending on product type. Based on the available data, the supplier shows a moderate production base, verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 1 year, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection, full customization capability, and strong response speed within 1 hour. Commercially, it has achieved 70+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.9 store rating and 10+ reviews. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking responsive communication, moderate-scale sourcing, and customized food powder products, while buyers requiring extensive transaction history or large-scale proven export performance should conduct further validation.

Jiangxi Yufresh Food Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Jiangxi, China
  • Factory area: 2,100+ m²
  • Employees: 130+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined physical manufacturing base with more than 2,100 m² of factory space and over 130 employees. This indicates a structured operational setup rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The presence of verified supplier status adds a degree of credibility to the company’s physical and operational existence. However, the provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, annual output capacity, equipment lists, food safety certifications, or third-party factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication.

Scoring Rationale

The company appears to have a medium-sized production base with sufficient staff and factory space to support regular production activities. The scale is not large enough, based on the available data, to classify it as a large-scale stable supply chain. At the same time, the combination of 130+ staff, 2,100+ m² facility area, and verified supplier status places it above a small or weak-capability supplier. The lack of detailed capacity data limits the score from reaching the upper range.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier tenure: 1 year
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Supplier verification: True
  • Platform tags: Finished product inspection, Response time ≤1h, On-time delivery 91.5%, Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has core platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification. These factors improve transaction transparency and provide buyers with a basic level of platform-backed protection. The listed tags also suggest the presence of process-related capabilities such as finished product inspection and customization. However, the Gold Supplier tenure is only 1 year, which limits the length of platform track record available for assessment. No additional compliance certifications are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the essential credibility elements expected from an -based supplier: Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These support a reasonable level of buyer confidence. However, the short 1-year Gold Supplier history means the company has not yet demonstrated long-term platform consistency. Because the compliance indicators are present but not yet supported by a long history or broader certification set, the score falls in the mid-to-good range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 70+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 70 orders over the past six months, showing active commercial engagement on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ indicates measurable but not high-volume sales performance. A 4.9 store rating is positive, although the review base of 10+ is still relatively limited. This means the rating is favorable but supported by a modest number of customer evaluations.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates real business activity with a meaningful number of recent orders and a strong rating. However, the transaction value is moderate, and the number of reviews remains limited, reducing the depth of commercial validation. The supplier is not underperforming, but the available transaction evidence does not support classification as a high-volume or highly proven supplier. Therefore, it fits the stable medium-performance range.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Response time: ≤1h
  • Full customization: Listed as platform tag

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported response time of within 1 hour indicates strong communication speed, which is important for quotation handling, order clarification, sampling discussions, and customization coordination. The full customization tag suggests the supplier can support customized requirements, though the data does not specify customization scope, such as formula adjustment, packaging design, private label service, or MOQ conditions for customized products.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets the strongest response-time benchmark, with response speed at or below 1 hour. It also has a full customization capability tag, which supports its suitability for buyers needing product or packaging adaptation. Because both fast communication and customization capability are present in the provided data, the supplier earns a high service capability score. The score is not reduced materially, although the precise customization scope remains unspecified.

Final Score

10 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 91.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 91.5%, which is above the 90% threshold for strong delivery performance. This suggests that the majority of platform-recorded orders are shipped according to the agreed timeline. For procurement buyers, this is a positive indicator for order reliability, especially for repeat purchases and time-sensitive replenishment cycles.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The supplier’s 91.5% performance clears this threshold, but it is still close to the lower end of the highest band rather than a near-perfect delivery rate. Therefore, a strong but not maximum score is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 10+
  • Finished product inspection: Listed as platform tag
  • Factory verification / verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which indicates positive customer feedback from available reviews. The finished product inspection tag is a useful quality-control indicator, suggesting that final goods are checked before shipment. Verified supplier status further supports the supplier’s credibility. However, the review count of 10+ is relatively limited, so the quality feedback base is not yet extensive. No specific food safety certifications, laboratory testing records, or third-party quality audit documents are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows several positive quality indicators: high rating, finished product inspection, and verified supplier status. These support confidence in basic quality management and customer satisfaction. However, the limited review volume prevents the rating from being considered highly mature or broadly validated. In addition, the absence of detailed quality certifications or inspection documentation means the quality assurance system cannot be assessed beyond the stated platform tags.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

81 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Jiangxi Yufresh Food Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking food powder products, ice cream mix-related items, yoghurt powder ingredients, and suppliers with responsive communication and customization capability.

The supplier is suitable for: - Small to medium-sized buyers requiring flexible sourcing - Buyers prioritizing fast response and Trade Assurance protection - Customers seeking moderate MOQ options such as 50 boxes, 200 bags, or 1-ton bulk orders - Buyers willing to validate product quality through samples before scaling orders

Main risk points: - Gold Supplier history is only 1 year - Review count is limited at 10+ - Transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ over six months is moderate rather than high - Detailed production capacity, food safety certifications, and third-party audit documentation are not provided - Halal appears only in a product title; no Halal certification data is provided, so certification status is Insufficient Data

Growth potential: The supplier has positive indicators in response speed, customization, delivery performance, and store rating. If it continues to increase transaction volume, accumulate more verified reviews, and provide stronger quality or compliance documentation, it could become a more competitive supplier for larger or more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Jiangxi Dedu Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Dedu Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Kangyi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Kangyi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengyuan Technology (Jiangxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengyuan Technology (Jiangxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Boman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Boman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pulek (Jiangxi) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pulek (Jiangxi) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xintao Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xintao Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Meierle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Meierle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Heying Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Heying Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Shengming Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Shengming Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Jinhang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Jinhang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Miji Electronics And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Miji Electronics And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Yuhao Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Yuhao Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Honghaili Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Honghaili Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Sanjianke Gas Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Sanjianke Gas Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Charm Food Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Charm Food Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Huasang Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Huasang Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shengyifan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shengyifan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Youshilihui Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Youshilihui Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Rongheyuan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Rongheyuan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kindle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kindle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Lianshi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Lianshi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Keycool Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Keycool Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xin Yuhui Biotech (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xin Yuhui Biotech (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shunde Changsheng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shunde Changsheng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Macon New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Macon New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Mengran Brush Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Mengran Brush Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Loven Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Loven Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Yeson Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Yeson Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Xindun Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Xindun Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Tuhe Elevator Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Tuhe Elevator Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changge City Lingxing Power Machinery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Changge City Lingxing Power Machinery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Henan Botai Chemical Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Botai Chemical Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongsheng (Tianjin) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongsheng (Tianjin) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tianhuibao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tianhuibao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chars Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chars Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhonggang (Fujian) Aquatic Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhonggang (Fujian) Aquatic Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhilv Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhilv Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Puretal Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Puretal Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Jitian Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Jitian Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026