Sun Rise Exact Industrial Company. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

SUN RISE EXACT INDUSTRIAL COMPANY is a Taiwan-based supplier offering electrical and audio connector-related products, including panel mount connectors, XLR connectors, waterproof connectors, and 6.35mm connector products. Based on the provided data, the company shows solid manufacturing fundamentals, with a reported factory area of over 20,000㎡, more than 170 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and tags such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, and Minor Customization.

Commercial performance appears moderate rather than high-volume, with 10+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is excellent at 5.0, but the review base is very limited with only 2 reviews. The main concern is delivery reliability, as the on-time dispatch rate is only 66.7%. This supplier may be suitable for buyers prioritizing verified manufacturing capability and connector product sourcing, but delivery performance should be closely managed.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: SUN RISE EXACT INDUSTRIAL COMPANY
• Country code: TW
• Factory area: 20,000+㎡
• Employees: 170+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Production output capacity: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a relatively strong manufacturing foundation based on its reported factory size and workforce. A factory area exceeding 20,000㎡ indicates a sizeable operating base, while 170+ employees suggests the company has more than basic production staffing. The presence of verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility of its physical operation and supplier profile.

However, the provided data does not include detailed annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment list, automation level, capacity utilization, or major factory certifications beyond the verified supplier indication. Therefore, while the company appears to be a stable manufacturing supplier, its actual production scalability cannot be fully quantified from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier is stronger than a small workshop or trading-only entity due to its factory area, employee base, and verified supplier status. However, the lack of detailed production capacity data prevents assigning a top-tier score. It fits best into the “medium-sized stable factory” to “upper-medium manufacturing base” category rather than a fully proven large-scale supply chain.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verification status: Verified supplier indicated as True
• Certification / industry tags:
• OEM for well-known brands
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 9-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence and continuity. Trade Assurance support adds transactional protection for buyers, while the verified supplier status provides an additional layer of credibility.

The provided platform tags also indicate operational service capabilities, including ODM availability, minor customization, and finished product inspection. The “OEM for well-known brands” tag is present, but no specific brand names or customer references are provided, so this should be treated as a platform label rather than independently verified customer evidence.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has most of the key platform credibility elements: long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, verification status, and multiple operational capability tags. The only limitation is that the data does not include detailed third-party certification documents, named audit reports, or specific compliance certificates. Even so, within the available data, its platform credibility is strong and relatively mature.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated actual platform transaction activity, with more than 10 orders and over CN¥202.8K in transaction value during the past six months. This confirms that the supplier has some recent commercial traction on the platform.

The store rating of 5.0 is positive, but the credibility of this rating is limited by the very small review count of only 2. The order volume is also not high enough to demonstrate large-scale, high-frequency buyer validation. Therefore, while the supplier is commercially active, its business performance should be considered moderate rather than strongly proven.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has measurable transaction data and a perfect rating, but the low number of reviews and relatively limited recent order count restrict the confidence level. The CN¥202.8K+ transaction value indicates some purchasing activity, but not enough to support a high-performance score. The supplier is commercially validated at a basic-to-moderate level.

Final Score

13 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤9h
• Customization-related tags:
• ODM service available
• Minor customization
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time of within 9 hours, which is acceptable but not highly responsive compared with suppliers responding within one hour. The presence of ODM service and minor customization tags suggests the supplier can support some level of product adaptation or development service.

However, the provided data does not confirm Full Customization capability. Since the scoring standard specifically values strong customization and rapid response, the lack of confirmed full customization and the response time of up to 9 hours place the supplier in a mid-level service capability range.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier appears to have functional service capability through ODM and minor customization support. However, its response speed is not among the fastest, and there is no direct evidence of Full Customization capability. This supports a moderate score rather than a premium service score.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 66.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s delivery performance is the weakest area in the available data. An on-time dispatch rate of 66.7% falls below the 70% threshold stated in the scoring framework. This suggests that buyers may face shipment timing uncertainty, especially for time-sensitive procurement projects.

The data does not provide reasons for the delayed dispatch performance, such as product complexity, order customization, raw material lead time, or logistics constraints. Therefore, the analysis can only conclude that the current on-time dispatch indicator is weak and requires buyer attention.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, suppliers with on-time dispatch rates below 70% should receive fewer than 5 points. Since the supplier’s rate is 66.7%, the score must reflect a clear delivery risk. This does not necessarily mean the supplier cannot fulfill orders, but it indicates that delivery reliability should be carefully controlled through confirmed lead times, production milestones, and Trade Assurance terms.

Final Score

4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 2
• Finished Product Inspection: Present as platform tag
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Factory Verification: Indicated through verified supplier status, but detailed audit report is Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 5.0 and includes Finished Product Inspection among its platform tags, which is positive for quality assurance. Verified supplier status also supports the presence of some credibility and supplier-check mechanism.

However, the review count is only 2, which is too limited to strongly validate consistent customer satisfaction. The data does not provide defect rates, inspection reports, quality certifications, product testing standards, return rates, or detailed factory verification documents. As a result, the supplier shows a basic-to-good quality assurance profile, but customer feedback depth remains weak.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves credit for its perfect rating, finished product inspection tag, and verified supplier status. Nevertheless, the very small number of reviews limits the reliability of customer feedback. Since the quality system appears present but not deeply documented, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance” range rather than the top category.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

SUN RISE EXACT INDUSTRIAL COMPANY can be considered a qualified supplier for buyers seeking connector-related products from a verified Taiwan-based manufacturer with a relatively strong factory base and long platform history. The supplier is especially suitable for buyers who value factory scale, Trade Assurance, ODM availability, minor customization, and finished product inspection.

Suitable customer types: - Buyers sourcing audio, electrical, or panel mount connector products
- Small to medium-volume buyers requiring MOQ around 100 pieces
- Buyers needing ODM or minor customization support
- Buyers who prefer suppliers with long Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance protection

Main risks: - On-time dispatch rate is low at 66.7%, creating delivery reliability risk
- Review count is only 2, limiting customer feedback confidence
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- Detailed production capacity, quality certifications, and factory audit documents are Insufficient Data

Growth potential: The supplier has a solid operational base, strong platform credibility, and visible inspection/customization tags. If it improves delivery reliability and accumulates more verified customer feedback, its procurement attractiveness could increase significantly. For initial cooperation, buyers should start with controlled trial orders, confirm lead times in writing, use Trade Assurance, and require pre-shipment inspection or finished product inspection documentation before scaling order volume.