Shenzhen Sensor And Control Company Limited Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Shenzhen Sensor And Control Company Limited
Location: Guangdong, China

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Sensor And Control Company Limited is a China-based supplier offering strain gauges, torque sensors, semiconductor strain-related products, and scale sensor components, with listed MOQs ranging from 1 piece to 100 pieces depending on product type. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, including 12 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and certification/industry tags such as Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available, and Warranty available. Commercial performance is also solid, with 400+ orders and CN¥2.9M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 50+ reviews.

However, company scale information is limited. The listed factory area is only 180+㎡, and employee count is not provided, which restricts confidence in production capacity assessment. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified platform credibility, moderate-to-strong transaction validation, customization capability, and reliable delivery performance, while requiring additional due diligence on factory scale and workforce capacity before large-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 180+㎡
• Employee count: Insufficient Data
• Verified supplier/factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a declared physical factory area of 180+㎡, which indicates the existence of production or operational premises but suggests a relatively small-scale facility compared with larger industrial manufacturers. The employee count is not disclosed, making it difficult to evaluate labor capacity, production shifts, engineering support, or scalability for high-volume orders.

The supplier is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a basic level of credibility regarding company existence and operational legitimacy. However, the available data does not include detailed factory audit reports, production lines, equipment lists, monthly production capacity, or workforce structure.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic production presence and supplier verification, which supports a minimum level of operational credibility. However, the small disclosed factory area and missing employee count limit confidence in large-scale manufacturing capability. Based strictly on the provided data, this supplier is better characterized as a small but operationally established supplier rather than a large-scale manufacturer.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification/industry tags: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 12-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides buyers with transaction protection through the platform. The supplier also carries multiple useful commercial and compliance-related tags, including warranty availability, finished product inspection, customization capability, and ODM service availability.

The presence of supplier verification further strengthens platform trustworthiness. These indicators collectively suggest that the supplier has maintained an established online export-facing profile and has adopted several buyer-facing assurance mechanisms.

Scoring Rationale

This dimension is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. The 12-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance participation, supplier verification, and multiple service/quality-related tags represent a relatively complete platform credibility structure. There is no provided evidence of internationally recognized management system certifications or product certifications, so a perfect score is not assigned.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past six months: 400+
• Transaction value in past six months: CN¥2.9M+
• Store rating: 4.8
• Reviews: 50+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated active recent business performance, with more than 400 orders and over CN¥2.9M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates meaningful market activity and a proven ability to convert platform traffic into completed transactions.

The store rating of 4.8 is strong and suggests generally positive buyer experience. The review count of 50+ provides some validation, although it is not extremely high relative to the order count. Still, the combination of order volume, transaction value, and rating supports a favorable commercial track record.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows high order activity and significant transaction value over a recent six-month period, which are strong indicators of commercial validation. The 4.8 rating reinforces buyer satisfaction, while 50+ reviews provide moderate feedback depth. Because the review base is not very large compared with the order volume, the score is strong but not maximum.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Full Customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time of within four hours, which is acceptable for international B2B communication and indicates reasonable responsiveness. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service available tags suggests the supplier can support tailored product requirements rather than only standard catalog sales.

However, the response time is not within one hour, which would represent a higher service-performance benchmark. Also, the data does not specify engineering team size, design support process, sampling lead time, or customization workflow.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service capability through customization and ODM support, combined with a reasonable response time of ≤4 hours. This meets the profile of a responsive supplier with customization capability, though it does not reach the highest service tier due to the absence of ≤1h response time and limited detail on technical support resources.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 99.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate is 99.5%, which is very strong and significantly above the 90% benchmark for top-tier delivery performance. This indicates that the supplier has been able to dispatch orders reliably within expected timelines on the platform.

The data does not include average lead time, production lead time by product category, logistics method, or late-shipment dispute history. However, based on the available on-time dispatch rate, delivery execution appears highly reliable.

Scoring Rationale

With a 99.5% on-time dispatch rate, the supplier clearly falls into the highest scoring band for delivery performance. Since the available delivery metric is both specific and strong, a full score is justified under the provided scoring rules.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.8
• Reviews: 50+
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.8, indicating generally positive customer feedback. The 50+ reviews provide a usable but not extensive feedback base. Finished Product Inspection is listed, which supports basic quality control before shipment. Warranty availability also adds buyer protection from a service and after-sales perspective.

Factory or supplier verification adds another layer of credibility, although the data does not provide detailed inspection procedures, defect rates, quality certificates, testing standards, or third-party product certification documents.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good quality-related indicators through a high rating, verified supplier status, finished product inspection, and warranty availability. However, the review count is moderate rather than large, and there is insufficient data on formal quality management certifications, testing equipment, or defect-control performance. Therefore, the quality profile is strong but not sufficient for a top-tier score.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation with controlled qualification checks.

Shenzhen Sensor And Control Company Limited is suitable for buyers seeking strain gauges, torque sensors, and related sensor components from a supplier with strong platform credibility, proven recent transaction activity, good customer ratings, customization capability, and excellent on-time dispatch performance. The supplier may be especially suitable for small to medium-volume procurement, sample orders, customized sensor-related projects, and buyers who value Trade Assurance protection.

Applicable customer types:
- Buyers requiring platform-verified suppliers with Trade Assurance
- Small and medium-volume industrial component buyers
- Customers needing Full Customization or ODM service
- Buyers prioritizing reliable dispatch performance

Main risks:
- Factory area is only listed as 180+㎡, indicating limited visible production scale
- Employee count is Insufficient Data
- No detailed production capacity, equipment list, or formal certification documents are provided
- Review count is moderate rather than extensive

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong commercial traction, long-term platform presence, and reliable delivery metrics. If additional factory capacity data, employee information, production equipment details, and quality certification evidence can be provided, its procurement suitability for larger or more strategic orders would improve further.