Shanghai Tay Washing Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanghai TAY Washing Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 9,400+ sqm and 30+ staff. The supplier appears positioned around washing machinery-related products and accessories, including stainless steel components, drum accessories, washing machine controllers, flexible tubes, and peristaltic pumps, based strictly on the listed product data. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 11 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Commercial performance is moderate to solid, with 50+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months, a 4.8 store rating, and 10+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking verified Chinese manufacturing support, small MOQ access, customization options, and stable delivery performance. Key limitations are the relatively small disclosed workforce and limited review volume.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier reports a factory area of 9,400+ sqm, 30+ staff, and verified supplier status. The factory is located in Shanghai, China.

Elaboration:
The factory area indicates a meaningful physical production or operational footprint. However, the disclosed employee count of 30+ staff suggests a relatively lean organization rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The verified supplier status provides a basic level of external credibility regarding the company’s existence and supplier profile, but no detailed factory audit report, production line count, machinery list, annual capacity, or specific factory certification is provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier does not fit the profile of a large-scale supply chain operation because the employee base is limited and production capacity details are insufficient. However, the factory size and verified supplier status support the conclusion that it has more than basic trading capability and likely maintains stable operational infrastructure. The appropriate rating is therefore in the mid-range for a stable medium-sized or small-to-medium factory with partial but not complete production transparency.

Final Score: 15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is listed as an Gold Supplier for 11 years, supports Trade Assurance, and has platform tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, and Minor customization. Verified supplier status is also provided.

Elaboration:
An 11-year Gold Supplier history is a strong platform credibility indicator, showing long-term presence on . Trade Assurance improves buyer protection during transactions. The presence of inspection and customization-related platform tags strengthens the supplier’s compliance and service profile. However, no independent international certifications, product compliance certificates, or detailed audit documents are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates a strong and long-standing credibility profile. Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status together provide a solid platform-based trust foundation. The absence of named third-party certifications prevents a perfect score, but within the available platform compliance data, the supplier performs strongly.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
Past six-month performance shows 50+ orders, CN¥1M+ transaction value, a 4.8 store rating, and 10+ reviews.

Elaboration:
The order count and transaction value indicate active recent commercial performance. CN¥1M+ over six months suggests measurable market validation rather than only a passive storefront. The 4.8 rating is positive, but the review base of 10+ is still relatively limited, which reduces the statistical strength of customer feedback. No customer names, buyer regions, repeat purchase rate, or category-level sales breakdown are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows stable business activity with a reasonable transaction amount and good rating. However, compared with high-volume suppliers, the order count and review quantity are not large enough to confirm broad market traction. The score reflects a stable but not top-tier commercial performance profile.

Final Score: 16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
Communication response time is reported as ≤2h. Platform labels include Full customization, Minor customization, and ODM service available.

Elaboration:
A response time within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for procurement discussions. The customization labels suggest the supplier can support buyer-specific requirements, ranging from minor adjustments to fuller customization and ODM-related service. However, no data is provided on engineering team size, sample development lead time, language support, quotation turnaround, or after-sales process.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates good service capability due to fast response and customization availability. It does not reach the highest service band because the response time is not stated as ≤1h and detailed service process data is insufficient. The score reflects above-average service readiness with some information gaps.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
The reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%.

Elaboration:
A 100.0% on-time delivery rate is a strong delivery indicator. It suggests that, based on the platform data provided, the supplier has met scheduled shipment commitments. However, the dataset does not include shipment volume, order complexity, average lead time, or whether this rate applies across all product categories.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided figure is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score. The main limitation is that the underlying shipment sample size is not disclosed.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
The supplier has a 4.8 store rating, 10+ reviews, Finished Product Inspection label, and verified supplier status.

Elaboration:
The 4.8 rating is positive and indicates generally favorable customer feedback. Finished Product Inspection is a meaningful quality-control indicator, showing that product inspection is part of the supplier’s listed capability. Verified supplier status further supports basic trust. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits confidence in the rating’s representativeness. No defect rate, inspection standard, product test report, warranty policy, or third-party quality certification is provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has good quality signals through rating, inspection label, and verification status, but the relatively low review volume and lack of detailed quality documentation prevent a high-end score. The assessment supports a solid quality profile with moderate evidence depth.

Final Score: 16 / 20

Total Score

84 / 100

Score breakdown:

• Company Strength: 15 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
• Business Performance: 16 / 20
• Service Capability: 8 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Shanghai TAY Washing Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking washing machinery-related components or accessories with low MOQ options, customization support, Trade Assurance protection, and strong platform credibility.

The supplier is most suitable for small to medium-sized buyers, maintenance and equipment accessory purchasers, customized component buyers, and procurement teams that value verified supplier status and responsive communication. Its strengths include 11 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, 100.0% on-time delivery, Full Customization availability, and Finished Product Inspection.

Main risks include limited disclosed workforce size, limited review quantity, insufficient data on production capacity, and absence of detailed factory audit reports or named product certifications. Growth potential is positive if the supplier can provide more transparent capacity data, quality documentation, and stronger customer feedback evidence. For first orders, buyers should use Trade Assurance, request inspection records, confirm technical specifications, and start with controlled-volume procurement.