Hebei Xiongan Tongqu Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Hebei Xiongan Tongqu Trading Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, offering plush-related products including dinosaur skeleton plush toys, arcade plush supplies, children’s plush sofa items, low-price plush products, and mini key pendants. Based on the provided data, the supplier appears to be a small-scale but commercially active vendor, with a reported factory area of 130+㎡ and 10+ staff. Its operational scale is limited, but it has supplier verification, Gold Supplier status for 4 years, Trade Assurance support, and customization-related service tags including Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization.

Commercially, the supplier demonstrates relatively strong recent activity, with 200+ orders and CN¥1.8M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 30+ reviews. It is most suitable for buyers seeking low-to-mid MOQ plush products, customization options, and platform-backed transactions. Key limitations relate to small production scale and insufficient disclosed quality inspection data.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company name: Hebei Xiongan Tongqu Trading Co., Ltd.
• Country/Province: China, Hebei
• Factory area: 130+㎡
• Employees: 10+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively small physical footprint and workforce, with only 130+㎡ of factory area and 10+ staff reported. This indicates a limited production scale compared with medium or large factories. However, the presence of supplier verification provides some baseline credibility regarding the company’s operational existence and platform-recognized supplier status.

The product portfolio covers multiple plush-related items with MOQs ranging from 20 pieces to 100 pieces, suggesting the supplier may be better positioned for small-batch procurement, trial orders, promotional plush sourcing, or flexible replenishment rather than large-scale industrial production programs.

Scoring Rationale

The company does not meet the indicators of a large-scale or medium-sized manufacturing base due to the limited factory area and small staff size. Nevertheless, it has basic production capability indicators and verified supplier status, which prevents the score from falling into the weak-capability range. The supplier is best assessed as a small-scale operation with basic supply capability rather than a large manufacturing partner.

Final Score

11 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verification status: True
• Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile. It has maintained Gold Supplier status for 4 years and supports Trade Assurance, which gives buyers a more structured transaction framework through the platform. The verification status further strengthens the supplier’s credibility compared with unverified vendors.

The available platform tags also indicate service-related capabilities, including warranty availability and customization options. However, no independent third-party product certifications, factory management system certifications, or specific compliance certificates are provided in the data. Therefore, the evaluation must remain limited to platform-based credibility rather than broader compliance assurance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several important platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, 4-year operating history on the platform, Trade Assurance, and verification. These are strong signals for -based sourcing. However, because the data does not include specific product safety certifications, factory management certifications, or detailed compliance documentation, the supplier cannot be scored at the absolute top level.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.8M+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity. More than 200 orders over six months indicates active market demand and a reasonable level of buyer engagement. The transaction value of CN¥1.8M+ further suggests that the supplier is not only receiving small trial orders but also generating meaningful sales volume through the platform.

The 4.9 store rating is a positive performance signal, while 30+ reviews provide some degree of customer feedback validation. The review count is not extremely large, but it is sufficient to support a basic commercial track record when combined with the order and transaction data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in recent platform sales, with both order count and transaction value at a strong level for a small-scale supplier. The high store rating supports positive buyer satisfaction. The only limitation is that the review base, at 30+, is moderate rather than extensive, so the score is strong but not maximum.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Full Customization: Available
• ODM service: Available
• Minor customization: Available

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates solid service capability, especially in customization. The presence of Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization indicates that the supplier can support different levels of buyer requirements, from small changes to more developed product customization.

The response time of ≤2 hours is commercially acceptable and suggests reasonable communication efficiency. However, it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. Therefore, the service capability is good but not at the highest level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier offers strong customization-related service tags, which is valuable for buyers sourcing plush products that may require design, size, color, or branding adjustments. The response speed is acceptable but not top-tier under the given criteria. Based on the available data, the supplier fits the “normal response with customization capability” range, leaning toward the upper end due to Full Customization and ODM availability.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided in the dataset. This suggests that recent orders have been shipped according to committed schedules on the platform.

For buyers, this is a meaningful operational advantage, especially for plush products used in promotions, retail replenishment, arcade supply, or seasonal sales where timing can directly affect sales performance.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it meets the highest delivery performance range. No negative delivery data is provided.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 30+
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Supplier verification data provided as True

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9, which indicates positive customer feedback. The review count of 30+ provides some support, though it is not a large feedback base. Supplier verification also adds a layer of quality-related credibility from a platform perspective.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available. There is also no detailed information on formal quality management systems, product testing reports, defect rates, inspection standards, or third-party product certifications. Therefore, the quality assessment must rely mainly on store rating, reviews, and supplier verification.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s customer feedback is positive, and the rating is high. Verification status also supports baseline trust. However, the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and the limited number of reviews prevent the supplier from being rated as having a fully developed quality assurance system. The score reflects good customer feedback with only partial quality system visibility.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Hebei Xiongan Tongqu Trading Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking plush products with relatively low MOQs, platform-backed transactions, and customization options. The supplier is especially appropriate for small to mid-sized buyers, trial orders, promotional product sourcing, arcade plush procurement, and buyers who prioritize Trade Assurance and responsive customization support.

Main strengths include:
- Strong recent business activity: 200+ orders and CN¥1.8M+ transactions in six months
- High store rating of 4.9
- 100.0% on-time delivery rate
- Gold Supplier for 4 years with Trade Assurance
- Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization available

Main risks include:
- Small factory scale: 130+㎡ and 10+ staff
- Limited disclosed production capacity information
- Finished Product Inspection status: Insufficient Data
- No provided data on product certifications, testing reports, or formal quality management systems
- Review quantity is moderate rather than extensive

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong commercial momentum despite its small scale. If it can provide more transparent quality control documentation, inspection processes, and production capacity details, it may become a stronger sourcing option for repeat plush product orders and customized small-to-medium batch programs.