Dalian Yida Precision Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Dalian Yida Precision Rubber Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based rubber products supplier located in Liaoning, with a reported factory area of 16,000+ sqm and 190+ staff. The supplier presents a solid manufacturing profile for customized rubber sealing products, including NBR, Buna N, FKM, and EPDM O-rings or rubber sealing components, with relatively flexible MOQs ranging from 99 to 500 pieces based on the listed products. On , the company is a 2-year Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and has supplier/factory verification indicators, supported by platform labels including response time within 3 hours and 100.0% on-time delivery. Commercial performance is still limited, with 10+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, although the store rating is high at 4.9. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume customized rubber sealing components, especially those prioritizing verified production capacity and delivery reliability over extensive transaction history.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 16,000+ sqm
- Employees: 190+ staff
- Verified supplier/factory status: True
- Product scope shown: customized NBR, Buna N, FKM, EPDM O-rings and rubber sealing products

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with 16,000+ sqm of factory space and more than 190 staff, indicating a meaningful manufacturing footprint. This scale is stronger than a small workshop and supports the supplier’s positioning as a factory-oriented rubber product manufacturer. The presence of multiple customized rubber sealing product listings also suggests operational focus within rubber precision components rather than a broad trading-only profile.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates medium-to-strong factory capacity through its factory area, employee count, and verified supplier/factory status. However, the available data does not include annual production capacity, machinery list, production lines, export history, or formal factory management certifications. Therefore, it should not be rated as a top-tier large-scale supply chain, but it is clearly above a small or weak-capacity supplier.

Final Score
17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry labels: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier/factory status: True

Elaboration
The supplier has several important credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verification-related information. These elements help reduce basic platform risk for buyers. The 2-year Gold Supplier duration provides some platform history, though it is still relatively short compared with long-established suppliers with many years of verified activity.

Scoring Rationale
Core platform credibility is present: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification indicators are all positive. The limitation is the short Gold Supplier tenure of 2 years and the lack of additional disclosed compliance certifications, such as ISO, product compliance certificates, or third-party audit documents. Based strictly on the provided data, the supplier has credible but not fully mature platform backing.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 4

Elaboration
The supplier’s recent transaction activity shows active business, but the scale is modest. A 4.9 store rating is strong, yet the review count of 4 is limited and does not provide a broad customer feedback base. The six-month transaction amount of CN¥67.6K+ and 10+ orders indicates that the supplier has completed platform transactions, but the commercial validation remains relatively early-stage or low-volume based on the available figures.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier earns credit for having actual recent orders, a positive transaction amount, and a high store rating. However, the order quantity, transaction value, and review base are not high enough to support a strong business performance score. The limited number of reviews also reduces confidence in the stability of customer satisfaction across a larger buyer base.

Final Score
12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Platform label: “Response time ≤3h”
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours is acceptable and indicates reasonable communication responsiveness on the platform. Several product listings include “Custom” in the product names, which suggests customized product offerings are listed; however, the provided data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability. Therefore, customization strength cannot be fully validated beyond the product descriptions.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is good but does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The supplier appears relevant to custom rubber products, but because explicit Full Customization capability is not provided, the service score should remain moderate rather than high. The available information supports basic-to-good service capability, but not a premium service rating.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
- Platform label: “On-time delivery 100.0%”

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery-related indicator provided. This is highly positive for procurement planning, especially for buyers who require predictable shipment execution. However, the delivery performance should be interpreted alongside the relatively limited recent order volume of 10+ orders over six months.

Scoring Rationale
Based on the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it deserves a high score. A perfect score is not assigned because the underlying order volume is not large, so the delivery record has not been validated across a broad transaction base.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 4
- Verified supplier/factory status: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: indicated as True through verified supplier/factory status

Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive sign for customer satisfaction. However, the review count is only 4, so the feedback sample is small. The supplier/factory verification indicator supports basic quality confidence at the company level, but no specific Finished Product Inspection information is provided. There is also no disclosed data on defect rate, inspection process, quality certifications, or customer complaint history.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating and verified supplier/factory status support a moderate-to-good quality assessment. Nevertheless, the very limited number of reviews and missing Finished Product Inspection data prevent a higher score. The supplier has positive quality signals, but the evidence base is not yet deep enough to classify it as having a mature and fully proven quality assurance system.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

75 / 100

• Company Strength: 17 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16 / 20
• Business Performance: 12 / 20
• Service Capability: 7 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 14 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scope and appropriate pre-shipment quality checks. Dalian Yida Precision Rubber Products Co., Ltd. appears suitable for small-to-medium volume buyers seeking customized rubber O-rings, NBR/Buna N/FKM/EPDM sealing parts, and flexible MOQ procurement. The supplier’s main strengths are its verified factory profile, 16,000+ sqm facility, 190+ staff, Trade Assurance support, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate.

The main risks are limited commercial validation, with only 10+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, as well as only 4 customer reviews. Quality assurance data is also incomplete because Finished Product Inspection information is not provided. For new buyers, a sample order or pilot batch is advisable before scaling purchasing volume. Growth potential is present if the supplier continues to build transaction volume, expand review history, and provide clearer quality control documentation.