Tianjin New Rising Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Tianjin New Rising Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Tianjin, with a reported factory area of over 30,000㎡ and verified supplier status. Its listed products focus on dairy and livestock farming equipment, including cow farm fans, cow body cleaners, rubber mats, calf feeders, and teat cleaning brush machines. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, supported by 13 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, warranty availability, and Full Customization. Business activity appears moderate, with 50+ orders and CN¥946.5K+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the store rating of 4.3 and only 5 reviews limit the depth of customer feedback validation. Delivery performance is strong at 91.3% on-time dispatch. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified livestock equipment suppliers with customization capability, while buyers should further verify employee scale, quality consistency, and after-sales performance before large-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Tianjin, China
- Factory area: 30,000+㎡
- Employee count: Insufficient Data
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration
The supplier reports a factory area of more than 30,000㎡, which indicates a relatively substantial physical production base. This level of facility scale is generally supportive of multi-category livestock equipment production and potentially stable order handling. The company is also marked as a verified supplier, which strengthens confidence in its operational presence. However, the employee count is not provided, making it difficult to fully assess labor capacity, production organization, and scalability.

Scoring Rationale
The factory area is a strong positive factor and supports a medium-to-large production profile. Verified supplier status also adds credibility. However, the absence of employee data prevents a full assessment of production manpower and operational depth. Therefore, the supplier should not receive a top-tier score despite having a sizable factory footprint.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full Customization
- Verified supplier status: True

Elaboration
The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 13 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support provides additional transaction protection for buyers. The available labels are relatively complete, covering warranty, inspection, ODM, and customization capabilities. The presence of both platform tenure and verification indicators suggests a comparatively mature supplier profile.

Scoring Rationale
A 13-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status together form a strong credibility base. The certification and service labels are also broad and procurement-relevant. The score is close to the top range, with only minor reservation because no additional third-party management system certifications, such as ISO certificates, are provided in the supplied data.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past six months: 50+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥946.5K+
- Store rating: 4.3
- Review count: 5

Elaboration
The supplier has achieved more than 50 orders and over CN¥946.5K in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates active commercial performance and a certain level of buyer acceptance. However, the number of reviews is very limited at only 5, which reduces the reliability of customer satisfaction analysis. The store rating of 4.3 is acceptable but not exceptionally high.

Scoring Rationale
The order count and transaction value show meaningful recent business activity, supporting a stable mid-level commercial profile. However, the low review volume and moderate 4.3 rating limit confidence in broad market validation. The supplier performs better than a low-activity supplier, but the customer feedback base is not strong enough for a high-score classification.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier provides a response time within two hours, which indicates reasonable communication efficiency for procurement inquiries. Full Customization and ODM service availability suggest that the supplier can support non-standard requirements or buyer-specific product adjustments. This is particularly relevant for agricultural and livestock equipment buyers who may need customized dimensions, configurations, or application-specific solutions.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates solid service capability due to quick response and customization support. However, the response time is not stated as within one hour, so it does not meet the highest service scoring band. Based on the available data, the supplier fits the upper end of normal service capability rather than the top tier.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 91.3%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 91.3% is above the 90% benchmark. This indicates reliable delivery discipline and suggests that the supplier can manage order fulfillment timelines relatively well. For procurement teams, this is an important factor when sourcing equipment or components for scheduled farm operations.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% falls into the 9–10 point range. The supplier qualifies for a strong score. However, since the rate is only moderately above 90%, rather than substantially higher, a 9-point score is more appropriate than a full score.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.3
- Review count: 5
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Factory / supplier verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status, both of which are positive indicators for quality assurance. These mechanisms suggest that some level of product checking and supplier validation is in place. However, the customer feedback base is limited, with only 5 reviews. The store rating of 4.3 is acceptable but does not indicate outstanding customer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
Quality assurance indicators are present, especially Finished Product Inspection and verification status. These support a reasonable quality confidence level. However, the low review count creates uncertainty around consistency across multiple buyers and orders. The rating is not weak, but it is not high enough, nor sufficiently supported by review volume, to justify a top-tier quality score.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

82 / 100

• Company Strength: 16 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
• Business Performance: 15 / 20
• Service Capability: 8 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled procurement validation. Tianjin New Rising Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, a sizable reported factory area, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, customization capability, and good delivery performance. It is suitable for buyers sourcing livestock and dairy farming equipment who value supplier verification, customization options, and moderate recent transaction activity.

The main risks are limited employee data, only 5 customer reviews, and a 4.3 store rating, which restrict visibility into quality consistency and customer satisfaction. For first-time buyers, sample orders, product inspection, and clear quality specifications are recommended before scaling to larger orders. The supplier has growth potential due to its long platform history, factory scale, and service labels, but larger procurement decisions should be supported by additional factory, workforce, and quality documentation.