zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Qingdao Skyjade Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Qingdao SkyJade Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, offering multifunctional self-adhesive turf jointing tapes with a listed MOQ of 10 rolls and a sample product price of CN¥60.86. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-to-medium supplier rather than a large-scale manufacturer, with 110+㎡ factory area and 50+ staff. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and commercial activity: it has 16 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, holds supplier verification status, and reports 100+ orders with CN¥3.5M+ transaction value over the past six months. Delivery performance is strong, with a 96.6% on-time delivery rate. However, the available quality evidence is limited by only 10+ reviews and no provided Finished Product Inspection data. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, stable platform-backed trading, and reliable delivery, while requiring additional quality confirmation before larger procurement commitments.

Detailed Analysis

Qingdao SkyJade Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd.

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 110+㎡
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined factory location and reports more than 50 employees, which indicates basic operational staffing capacity. However, the factory area of 110+㎡ is relatively small and does not indicate large-scale production infrastructure. The verified supplier status provides some credibility regarding operational existence, but the data does not include detailed production lines, annual output, equipment scale, or capacity utilization.

Scoring Rationale
The company has stronger evidence than a purely unverified small trader because it reports staff size and supplier verification. However, the very limited factory area restricts confidence in large-volume manufacturing capability. Based strictly on the data, it fits best into the “small but with basic production capability” range rather than the medium or large factory category.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Supplier verification: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Low MOQ for customization”, “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 96.6%”

Elaboration
The supplier shows strong platform credibility, especially through a 16-year Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. These are meaningful indicators for buyers who rely on -based transaction protection and supplier continuity. The presence of verification status further supports credibility. However, the provided certification or industry tags are mainly platform service indicators rather than formal product certifications or internationally recognized compliance certificates.

Scoring Rationale
The long Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support place the supplier in the upper scoring range. The only limitation is that no specific product certification, management system certification, or detailed factory audit document is provided. Therefore, the supplier has strong platform credibility, but the compliance profile is not fully complete.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past six months: 100+
- Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥3.5M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Number of reviews: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates clear commercial traction, with more than 100 orders and over CN¥3.5M in transaction value during the past six months. This suggests active market demand and a reasonable level of buyer acceptance. The 4.8 store rating is positive, but the review count of 10+ is relatively limited compared with the transaction volume, which reduces the depth of publicly visible customer validation.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs well in order count, transaction value, and rating. However, the limited review base means customer feedback is not broad enough to fully confirm consistency across many buyers. The business record supports a stable medium-to-strong commercial profile, but not the highest score tier.

Final Score
17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Customization-related tag: “Low MOQ for customization”
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of two hours or less indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag suggests some customization accessibility, especially for smaller buyers or trial orders. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, such as product structure changes, private labeling, packaging design, or technical specification adjustment.

Scoring Rationale
The service capability is above basic level due to timely response and low-MOQ customization indication. However, since response time is not within one hour and Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier does not qualify for the highest service score range.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 96.6%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 96.6% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong logistics and fulfillment indicator. This level exceeds the 90% benchmark for the highest delivery scoring range and suggests that the supplier is generally reliable in meeting agreed shipment timelines.

Scoring Rationale
Because the on-time delivery rate is above 90%, the supplier falls clearly into the 9–10 point range. The score is placed at the maximum level due to the strong reported delivery percentage, although no additional data is provided regarding average lead time or delay handling.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 10+
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supplier verification is provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The 4.8 store rating is a positive quality-related signal, and supplier verification adds a basic layer of trust. However, the number of reviews is limited at 10+, which makes it difficult to assess consistency across a wider customer base. Additionally, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control workflow, product testing reports, or third-party inspection records.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a good rating and some verification support, so it should not be scored as weak. However, the limited review count and missing Finished Product Inspection data prevent a higher score. Quality confidence is acceptable for trial or controlled purchases, but larger orders should require pre-shipment inspection or sample validation.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled risk management. Qingdao SkyJade Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking turf jointing tapes with low MOQ access, Trade Assurance protection, responsive communication, and strong delivery reliability. It is especially appropriate for small-to-medium buyers, trial orders, or buyers who prioritize platform credibility and on-time shipment.

Main risks include the small reported factory area, limited review volume, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, full customization capability, production capacity, and formal product certifications. For larger or quality-sensitive orders, buyers should request samples, confirm technical specifications, require pre-shipment inspection, and clarify quality control procedures before placing bulk orders.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its 16-year Gold Supplier history, recent transaction volume of CN¥3.5M+, and 96.6% on-time delivery rate. However, stronger quality documentation and broader customer feedback would be needed to improve procurement confidence for high-volume or long-term sourcing programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Qingdao Zhongsi Rubber & Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Zhongsi Rubber & Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Doowin Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Doowin Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Paishun Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Paishun Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Stone Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Stone Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Neway Rubber & Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Neway Rubber & Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Quanyi Rubber Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Quanyi Rubber Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Qiwo Rubber & Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Qiwo Rubber & Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mingze Rubber & Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mingze Rubber & Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Keyuan Rubber & Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Keyuan Rubber & Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Taizhou Girui Plastic & Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Taizhou Girui Plastic & Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Funaiwei Rubber & Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Funaiwei Rubber & Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Jingtu Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Jingtu Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Kangyuan Rubber And Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Kangyuan Rubber And Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dongyang Yongmin Rubber Plastic Magnet Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dongyang Yongmin Rubber Plastic Magnet Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin New Rising Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin New Rising Rubber And Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tracy Future Tech Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tracy Future Tech Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tongtianxia Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tongtianxia Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kaili Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kaili Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Julu Yuanjia Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Julu Yuanjia Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yixing Zhongfu Carbon Fiber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yixing Zhongfu Carbon Fiber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Fujian Yobest New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Yobest New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jiami Fluid Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jiami Fluid Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhongli Tools Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhongli Tools Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Honggao Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Honggao Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Jinshan Magnetic Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Jinshan Magnetic Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Usborn Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Usborn Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangnan Fulida Sign Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangnan Fulida Sign Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan United Star Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan United Star Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Taizheng Precision Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Taizheng Precision Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueyang Dongting Sealing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueyang Dongting Sealing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yishang Metal Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yishang Metal Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tianma Sling Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tianma Sling Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Feiyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Feiyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Henghui International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Henghui International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kongyue Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kongyue Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lanxi Wangxing Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lanxi Wangxing Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haifei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haifei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Lfn Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Lfn Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026