zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Hongweixin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Hongweixin Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering silicone-related products including customized high-temperature transparent silicone items, heat-resistant silicone products, silicone tubing, and silicone foam components. The supplier shows a basic-to-moderate production foundation, with a reported factory area of 3,200+㎡, 30+ staff, and verified supplier status. On platform credibility, it performs strongly with 7 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. Business activity is moderate, with 20+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months, though customer feedback is limited to only 1 review despite a 5.0 store rating. The main concern is delivery performance, with an on-time delivery rate of 71.4%, which indicates execution risk for time-sensitive procurement. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking silicone products with moderate customization needs, platform protection, and manageable order volumes, but not for projects requiring highly reliable delivery performance or extensively validated customer feedback.

Shenzhen Hongweixin Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 3,200+㎡
  • Employees: 30+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical factory base with a reported area of more than 3,200㎡ and a workforce of over 30 employees. This indicates that the company has basic manufacturing infrastructure rather than operating purely as a trading entity. The verified supplier status adds credibility to its operational presence. However, the employee count remains relatively limited, and the available data does not show evidence of large-scale production lines, multi-site operations, or advanced factory certifications beyond supplier verification.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic-to-moderate production capacity supported by a real factory footprint and verified supplier status. However, the scale is not large enough to be classified as a major or highly mature supply chain operation. The workforce size suggests the supplier may be better suited for small to medium procurement projects rather than very large-volume or highly complex production programs.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤6h”, “On-time delivery 71.4%”

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 7 years, which provides a meaningful record of platform presence. Trade Assurance support gives buyers additional transactional protection. Verified supplier status further strengthens credibility. However, the listed tags mainly relate to response time and delivery performance, and there is no provided evidence of broader product certifications, industry compliance certificates, or complete certification label coverage.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile due to its 7-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified status. These are important trust signals for international procurement. The score is not maximized because the provided data does not include detailed product compliance certifications or a broader certification portfolio.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 20+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥338K+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier shows active commercial performance with more than 20 orders and over CN¥338K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has recent buyer activity and is not inactive on the platform. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review count is only 1, which significantly limits the reliability of the rating as a broad customer satisfaction indicator.

Scoring Rationale

The order count and transaction value suggest moderate business traction, but not high-volume platform performance. The very low review count weakens the commercial validation, as there is insufficient customer feedback to confirm consistency across multiple buyers. Therefore, the supplier fits a stable but still limited business-performance profile.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤6h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response-time indicator of ≤6 hours, which is acceptable for regular business communication but does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. Some listed products include the word “Customized,” but the provided service capability data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization support as a platform service capability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier appears responsive enough for standard procurement communication, but the response time is not at the highest service level. Since Full Customization is not clearly confirmed in the provided service data, the customization capability cannot be fully credited under this dimension. This places the supplier in the lower end of the normal service capability range.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 71.4%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 71.4%, which falls within the 70–79% range. This indicates that delivery reliability is a notable concern, especially for buyers with strict project timelines, fixed launch dates, or supply chain continuity requirements.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 70% and 79% corresponds to 5–6 points. Since 71.4% is close to the lower end of this band, the supplier receives the lower score within the range. This is one of the supplier’s key operational weaknesses.

Final Score

5 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Reviews: 1
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the rating is based on only 1 review. This makes the feedback sample too small to draw strong conclusions about consistent product quality or after-sales performance. Verified supplier status supports basic credibility, but there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection or other detailed quality assurance systems.

Scoring Rationale

The high rating is encouraging but not statistically strong due to the very limited number of reviews. Factory verification provides some assurance of supplier legitimacy, but the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection data limits the ability to assess quality control depth. Therefore, the supplier receives a moderate-low quality feedback score.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

69 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking silicone products in small to medium order volumes, especially when Trade Assurance is desired for transaction protection. The supplier is more suitable for buyers who can tolerate moderate delivery risk and who are able to conduct additional pre-shipment checks.

Main risk points include the 71.4% on-time delivery rate, limited customer review base, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization capability. Its growth potential lies in its 7-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, active recent transaction record, and focused silicone product offering. For larger or time-critical procurement programs, buyers should request delivery commitments, quality inspection evidence, and sample validation before placing bulk orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Weituo Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Weituo Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Ningbo Airbrisk Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Airbrisk Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanshan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanshan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lei Rong Fluid Tech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lei Rong Fluid Tech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Humen Yihao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Humen Yihao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Connectech Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Connectech Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Xin Xin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Xin Xin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Senbi Home Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Senbi Home Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comstar Office Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comstar Office Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Xiou Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Xiou Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Dingbang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Dingbang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Trump Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Trump Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fresh Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fresh Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rungoal Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rungoal Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sanhok Hitech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sanhok Hitech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hong Kong Amorge Trading Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hong Kong Amorge Trading Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Shellight Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Shellight Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jaya International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jaya International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Ruiwo Phytochem Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Ruiwo Phytochem Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Lansing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Lansing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangli Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangli Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026