Beijing Stevia Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Beijing Stevia Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Beijing, with a reported factory area of 1,700+ m² and 30+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-to-medium scale supplier with verified supplier status, long Gold Supplier history of 12 years, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including Full Customization, ODM service, Minor Customization, and Warranty available. Its listed products are pumpkin seed-related items with relatively low minimum order quantities ranging from 1 kilogram to 500 kilograms, which may suit buyers requiring flexible trial orders or bulk procurement options. Commercial activity is moderate, with 100+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the store rating of 4.4 and 30+ reviews indicate customer feedback volume is still limited. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking a verified supplier with flexible MOQ and customization support, while quality-system depth requires further confirmation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Beijing, China
- Factory area: 1,700+ m²
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory audit or factory certification details beyond verified supplier status: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical operating base with a reported 1,700+ m² facility and 30+ employees. This indicates a basic manufacturing or processing capability rather than a large-scale industrial supply base. The verified supplier status improves credibility, but the provided data does not include detailed factory audit reports, production lines, annual capacity, machinery, food safety certifications, or third-party factory certification records.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates foundational production strength through its stated factory area, workforce, and verified supplier status. However, the scale is relatively limited compared with large-volume suppliers, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, equipment, or formal factory certifications. Therefore, it fits best within the “small but with basic production capability” to lower “medium stable factory” range.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier history: 12 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization
- Factory or supplier verification: Verified supplier indicated as True
- Other compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform profile, especially due to its 12-year Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. These two elements provide meaningful platform-level credibility and transaction protection. The presence of customization and warranty-related platform labels also strengthens the supplier’s commercial completeness. However, no independent compliance certifications, product certifications, food safety certifications, or detailed audit documents are provided.

Scoring Rationale
A 12-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status represent a relatively strong platform credibility foundation. The compliance profile is not fully complete because the available data does not confirm formal product or factory certifications beyond platform verification. As a result, the supplier scores high, but not at the maximum level.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
- Store rating: 4.4
- Number of reviews: 30+

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated recent commercial activity with more than 100 orders over the past six months and transaction value above CN¥540.9K. This suggests active buyer engagement and a certain level of market validation. However, the review count of 30+ is not large, and the store rating of 4.4 is acceptable but not outstanding. The data supports a moderate transaction base rather than a highly dominant sales performance.

Scoring Rationale
The order volume and transaction amount show stable commercial activity, but the relatively modest review base and mid-level rating reduce confidence in broad customer validation. The supplier is not commercially unproven, yet it does not reach the level of high-order, high-review, high-rating suppliers.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available
- Minor customization: Available

Elaboration
The supplier provides a response time of no more than two hours, which indicates reasonably efficient communication. The platform labels show that the supplier supports Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization, suggesting a flexible service model for buyers with different sourcing requirements. However, the response time is not within the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has good service capability due to customization support and an acceptable response time. Since the response speed is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, it does not qualify for the highest service score range. Still, the presence of multiple customization options supports a strong service assessment.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 89.3%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 89.3% falls just below the 90% threshold. This indicates generally reliable delivery performance, but with some room for improvement. For buyers with strict delivery schedules, this metric should be reviewed carefully before placing time-sensitive orders.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 89.3%, the supplier is close to the higher-performance threshold but remains slightly below 90%, so a high score within the 80–89% range is appropriate.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.4
- Number of reviews: 30+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification data is Insufficient Data
- Product quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.4 store rating and 30+ reviews, which provides some customer feedback but not a large feedback base. Verified supplier status contributes positively to quality confidence at the platform level. However, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing, food safety certification, quality management certification, or detailed inspection workflow. This limits the ability to fully assess quality assurance maturity.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has moderate customer feedback and basic platform verification, but the rating is not exceptionally high and the review volume is limited. More importantly, key quality assurance indicators such as Finished Product Inspection and formal quality certifications are not confirmed in the provided data. Therefore, the quality score should remain in the middle range rather than the high-confidence range.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

74 / 100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 13 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
- Business Performance: 15 / 20
- Service Capability: 8 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 8 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 12 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Beijing Stevia Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking a verified supplier with long platform history, Trade Assurance support, flexible MOQ options, and customization capability. The supplier appears suitable for small-to-medium buyers, trial orders, flexible procurement programs, and buyers who value platform transaction protection.

Key risks include limited confirmed production scale, insufficient data on formal factory certifications, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and a moderate customer feedback profile with a 4.4 rating and 30+ reviews. The 89.3% on-time dispatch rate is acceptable but should be monitored for urgent or time-sensitive orders.

Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s 12-year Gold Supplier status, active six-month transaction record, and customization labels. Before larger-volume procurement, buyers should request factory audit documents, quality inspection procedures, product compliance certificates, and recent batch inspection records.