zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Huizhou Bolide Ls Adhesive Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Huizhou Bolide Ls Adhesive Technology Co., Ltd.
Country/Region: Guangdong, China

Huizhou Bolide Ls Adhesive Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Huizhou Bolide Ls Adhesive Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based adhesive technology supplier with a reported factory area of over 5,000㎡ and more than 50 staff. The company presents a moderate production foundation and has supplier verification status, which supports a basic level of operational credibility. On , the supplier has been a Gold Supplier for 5 years, supports Trade Assurance, and displays compliance-related labels including Finished Product Inspection and 98.5% on-time delivery. Its business performance is relatively strong, with 100+ orders and CN¥7.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, though the review base remains limited at 20+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking adhesive-related products, die-cut flexible materials, pimple patches, grip tapes, and other listed products with relatively stable delivery performance. Key limitations include limited visibility on advanced factory certifications, detailed production capacity, and full customization capability.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 5,000+㎡
  • Employee count: 50+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • No detailed production capacity data provided
  • No specific factory certifications provided beyond supplier verification

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical factory scale of over 5,000㎡ and a workforce exceeding 50 employees. This indicates that the company is not a purely trading-oriented entity based on the provided data and has a measurable operational base. The factory size and staff number suggest a small-to-medium manufacturing setup rather than a large-scale industrial supplier.

The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operational profile. However, the data does not provide detailed monthly production capacity, number of production lines, equipment list, quality laboratory setup, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, while the company demonstrates basic manufacturing strength, the available information does not fully support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has enough factory and staffing information to confirm a foundational manufacturing capability. A factory area above 5,000㎡ and 50+ staff supports a mid-level operational profile. However, the absence of detailed production capacity and specific factory certifications limits confidence in scalability and long-term high-volume supply assurance. Based on the scoring criteria, this supplier fits best within the “medium stable factory” range, but toward the lower-middle side due to incomplete capacity data.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification/industry labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • Response time ≤7h
  • On-time delivery 98.5%

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively solid platform profile. A 5-year Gold Supplier history indicates a sustained presence on the platform rather than a newly established storefront. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with an additional transactional protection mechanism. Supplier verification status further strengthens platform credibility.

The available platform labels are relevant to procurement evaluation, particularly Finished Product Inspection and on-time delivery performance. These labels suggest that the supplier has some level of quality and delivery process visibility on the platform. However, the data does not mention internationally recognized certifications such as ISO, GMP, FDA, CE, or other industry-specific compliance certificates. Therefore, compliance credibility is strong at the platform level but not fully substantiated at the broader certification level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several core credibility indicators: 5 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and multiple platform labels. This supports a strong platform-based trust profile. However, because the provided data does not include detailed third-party factory audit reports or formal industry certifications, the supplier should not receive a perfect score. It falls within the high range due to complete core credibility signals.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥7.4M+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier shows meaningful recent transaction activity. More than 100 orders in the past six months indicates an active commercial operation rather than an inactive or unproven seller. The reported transaction value of CN¥7.4M+ is relatively strong and suggests that the supplier has handled a notable volume of business during the evaluation period.

The store rating of 4.6 is positive, though not at the highest performance level. The review count of 20+ provides some customer feedback reference but remains limited compared with suppliers that have hundreds or thousands of reviews. This means business activity is validated by order and transaction data, but customer feedback depth is still moderate.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates strong transaction performance through both order count and transaction value. The combination of 100+ orders and CN¥7.4M+ in six months supports a stable and commercially active supplier profile. However, the 4.6 rating and 20+ reviews indicate that customer feedback volume is not extensive. This prevents the supplier from being rated in the very top band, but the transaction data justifies a strong score.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤7h
  • Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
  • Product listings include customized-shape products, but explicit Full Customization capability is not provided

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of ≤7 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness. This is not fast enough to qualify for the highest service tier, which requires response time of ≤1 hour, but it still reflects a reasonable service standard for general procurement communication.

The data includes a product described as “Customized Shape Colorful Stars Pimple Patches,” which indicates the supplier may handle some customized product formats. However, the dataset does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” support as a service capability. Therefore, this report cannot assume advanced customization capacity, private-label development, packaging customization, OEM/ODM support, or technical design support.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a normal response speed and some product-level indication of customization, but explicit full customization capability is not confirmed. Since service capability scoring depends on both response time and customization support, the lack of clear data limits the score. The supplier is suitable for standard inquiries and potentially limited customization based on listed products, but buyers requiring complex customization should verify capability directly.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 98.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 98.5% is a strong indicator of delivery reliability. According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. This performance suggests that the supplier has demonstrated effective order fulfillment discipline on the platform.

However, the data does not provide additional delivery details such as average lead time, logistics partners, export experience, peak-season capacity, or delayed order handling process. Therefore, the delivery evaluation is based strictly on the provided on-time shipment rate.

Scoring Rationale

A 98.5% on-time delivery rate is well above the 90% threshold for the highest delivery performance band. Based on the available data, delivery reliability is one of the supplier’s strongest measurable advantages. While more detailed logistics data would improve visibility, the reported on-time rate supports a top-tier score in this category.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 20+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Present
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Present
  • No detailed defect rate, inspection standard, test report, or product certification data provided

Elaboration

The supplier has several quality-related signals. Finished Product Inspection is an important quality assurance indicator, suggesting that completed goods may undergo inspection before shipment. Verified supplier status and warranty availability further support a basic quality assurance framework.

The store rating of 4.6 is generally positive, but the review count of 20+ is not large enough to provide a broad customer feedback base. The available data does not include detailed product test reports, defect rate, return rate, batch inspection standards, or specific certifications. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have a reasonable quality foundation, the quality system cannot be considered fully transparent or highly mature based only on the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a solid score because it combines a positive rating, Finished Product Inspection, supplier verification, and warranty availability. However, the limited number of reviews and absence of deeper quality documentation prevent a top-tier rating. The quality profile is suitable for standard procurement, but buyers should request product samples and inspection documentation before large-scale orders.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 6 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Huizhou Bolide Ls Adhesive Technology Co., Ltd. demonstrates a solid platform profile, strong recent transaction performance, and excellent reported delivery reliability. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking adhesive-related products, flexible die-cut materials, pimple patches, grip tapes, and other listed product categories, especially for standard or moderately customized orders.

Suitable customer types:
- Small to mid-sized importers
- E-commerce sellers
- Brand owners requiring listed adhesive or patch-related products
- Buyers prioritizing Trade Assurance and stable delivery performance
- Purchasers seeking suppliers with moderate factory scale and active transaction history

Main risks:
- Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data
- No detailed production capacity information provided
- No specific factory certifications or international compliance certificates provided
- Review count is limited at 20+, despite good transaction value
- Quality system depth cannot be fully verified beyond Finished Product Inspection and supplier verification

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good commercial momentum with CN¥7.4M+ transaction value and 100+ orders over six months. If it can provide clearer production capacity data, formal certifications, stronger customization documentation, and more quality control records, its procurement attractiveness could improve further. For initial cooperation, sample testing, specification confirmation, and pre-shipment inspection are recommended before placing large-volume orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen Ls Vision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ls Vision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lixin Adhesive Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lixin Adhesive Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongli Adhesive Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongli Adhesive Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huade Adhesive Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huade Adhesive Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yongguan Adhesive Products Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yongguan Adhesive Products Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Youmei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Youmei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Suan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Suan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Jixinghong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Jixinghong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Chuangjing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Chuangjing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Hongjie Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Hongjie Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Huiheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Huiheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Honesty Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Honesty Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinyi Self Adhesive Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinyi Self Adhesive Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yixing City Yulong Plastic Adhesive Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yixing City Yulong Plastic Adhesive Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Jiadalong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Jiadalong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Longzhixin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Longzhixin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Shangmeijia Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Shangmeijia Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huanan Lineng Technology (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huanan Lineng Technology (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Haorui Hardware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Haorui Hardware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Newstar(Quanzhou) Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Newstar(Quanzhou) Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Karsun Access Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Karsun Access Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Gaolong Textile Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Gaolong Textile Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shenxiangyu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shenxiangyu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Boost Temperature Control Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Boost Temperature Control Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan New Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan New Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sanvo Chemical Industry Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sanvo Chemical Industry Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Liyan Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Liyan Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Hilt Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Hilt Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huihao Packing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huihao Packing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Nateen Intelligence Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Nateen Intelligence Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yihua Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yihua Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Newstar(Quanzhou) Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Newstar(Quanzhou) Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fold Art Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fold Art Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taicang Daorong Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taicang Daorong Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yibo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yibo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hanse Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hanse Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruzhou Yunfan Textile Import Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruzhou Yunfan Textile Import Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Ronsun Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Ronsun Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Yunwei Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Yunwei Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026