zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai Jinyi Self Adhesive Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shanghai Jinyi Self Adhesive Material Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, offering self-adhesive decorative materials such as custom wallpaper printing, wall stickers, wood-pattern vinyl PVC peel products, marble laminating PVC, tartan design PVC, and textured wood backsplash materials. Based on the provided data, the company shows a solid operating foundation with a reported factory area of over 30,000 sqm, more than 130 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 7 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance availability. Commercial performance appears moderate, with 50+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a high store rating of 4.9 but only 7 reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking decorative PVC or wallpaper-related products with moderate order volume and platform-backed transaction protection. Key limitations include limited review depth, no provided Finished Product Inspection data, and insufficient information on customization capability.

Shanghai Jinyi Self Adhesive Material Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shanghai, China
- Factory area: 30,000+ sqm
- Staff size: 130+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier reports a sizable factory area of more than 30,000 sqm, which indicates a meaningful physical production base for self-adhesive decorative materials. The employee count of 130+ staff suggests a medium-sized manufacturing organization rather than a very small workshop. The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the stated company profile and supports the view that the company has a basic supplier verification foundation.

Scoring Rationale
The company has clear manufacturing scale indicators, especially the 30,000+ sqm factory area. However, the staff size of 130+ places it closer to a medium-sized stable factory rather than a clearly large-scale supply chain organization. The data supports stable production capability, but does not provide further evidence such as production lines, annual capacity, equipment lists, or detailed audit reports. Therefore, the score is positioned in the upper range for a medium-sized stable factory, but not at the maximum level.

Final Score
17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags provided: “Response time ≤5h”, “On-time delivery 89.5%”

Elaboration
The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 7 years, which indicates a relatively long-standing platform presence. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with transaction protection through the platform. Verified supplier status further strengthens platform credibility. However, the provided certification or industry tags are operational performance indicators rather than product certifications, management system certifications, or compliance certificates.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs strongly in platform credibility due to its 7-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are important trust signals for procurement evaluation. At the same time, the available data does not show a complete compliance certification profile, such as product safety certifications, quality management certifications, or detailed audit documentation. As a result, the score is strong but slightly below the highest possible range.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 50+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 7

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 50 orders over the past six months, which demonstrates active transaction history on the platform. The transaction amount of CN¥202.8K+ indicates a measurable but not exceptionally high commercial scale. The store rating of 4.9 is positive, but the review count of 7 is limited, meaning the rating is based on a relatively small sample size.

Scoring Rationale
The order quantity and transaction value show that the supplier has real platform activity and some level of market acceptance. However, the business performance does not reach the level of high-volume, high-value transaction activity. The limited number of reviews weakens the reliability of the rating as a broad customer satisfaction indicator. Therefore, the supplier fits the category of stable medium-level business performance rather than a high-performing commercial benchmark supplier.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤5h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of within 5 hours indicates a reasonable communication speed for international procurement discussions. This is useful for quotation requests, product clarification, and order coordination. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, such as custom design, material specification, packaging, branding, or OEM/ODM development.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is acceptable but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be scored as having strong service capability. The score therefore reflects normal communication responsiveness with insufficient evidence of advanced customization support.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 89.5%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 89.5%, which is close to the 90% threshold but remains within the 80%–89% evaluation band. This suggests generally stable delivery performance, though there is still a measurable risk of delayed shipments compared with suppliers consistently exceeding 90%.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since the supplier’s rate is 89.5%, it is at the high end of this band and very close to the next performance tier. Therefore, the supplier receives the upper score within this range.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 7
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status provided

Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive quality and customer satisfaction signal. However, the total number of reviews is only 7, limiting the statistical reliability of the rating. Verified supplier status supports a basic level of company credibility, but the data does not provide clear evidence of Finished Product Inspection, quality control procedures, defect rates, inspection reports, or third-party product testing.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating supports a positive quality impression, but the small review base prevents a stronger conclusion. The lack of provided Finished Product Inspection information is a key limitation because it reduces visibility into the supplier’s quality assurance process before shipment. The supplier can be considered to have acceptable quality feedback and basic verification support, but the available data is not sufficient to classify its quality system as highly mature.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

79 / 100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 17 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
- Business Performance: 15 / 20
- Service Capability: 7 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 8 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 14 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled risk management. Shanghai Jinyi Self Adhesive Material Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking self-adhesive wallpaper, PVC decorative film, wall sticker, wood-pattern vinyl, marble-pattern PVC, and related decorative surface materials at moderate procurement volume.

The supplier is most suitable for:
- Small to medium importers seeking platform-protected sourcing
- Buyers requiring low to moderate MOQ products
- Decorative material distributors testing new patterns or product categories
- Procurement teams that value Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance

Main risk points:
- Limited customer review count, with only 7 reviews supporting the 4.9 rating
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- On-time delivery rate is 89.5%, close to but still below 90%
- No product certification or formal quality management certification data is provided

Growth potential is moderate to positive. The supplier has a meaningful factory scale, long platform history, Trade Assurance support, and active recent transactions. If future data confirms stronger quality inspection systems, broader customer feedback, and clear customization capability, the supplier’s procurement attractiveness would improve further.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Lixin Adhesive Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lixin Adhesive Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yongguan Adhesive Products Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yongguan Adhesive Products Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yunlin Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yunlin Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Jinyi Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Jinyi Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Jinyi Food Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Jinyi Food Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Shanghua Fluoro Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Shanghua Fluoro Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Tankii Alloy Material Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Tankii Alloy Material Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jiraw Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jiraw Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Flying New Material Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Flying New Material Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Haobin Stationery & Art Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Haobin Stationery & Art Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Bentensh Environmental Protection Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Bentensh Environmental Protection Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Nailite New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Nailite New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Moben New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Moben New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongli Adhesive Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongli Adhesive Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huade Adhesive Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Huade Adhesive Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Bolide Ls Adhesive Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Bolide Ls Adhesive Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yixing City Yulong Plastic Adhesive Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yixing City Yulong Plastic Adhesive Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Tinghao Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Tinghao Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Henan Drills-King Mining Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Drills-King Mining Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Daxia Medical Technology (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Daxia Medical Technology (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Weizhengheng Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Weizhengheng Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Dianpin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Dianpin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuzhou Mythweft Handicrafts Business Department Supplier Evaluation
Yuzhou Mythweft Handicrafts Business Department Supplier Evaluation
Icen Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Icen Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Jiaxing Fengshang Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiaxing Fengshang Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huapo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huapo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wanfeng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wanfeng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ems Pioneer International Limited Supplier Evaluation
Ems Pioneer International Limited Supplier Evaluation
Kong Seng Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kong Seng Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Lafulaifu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Lafulaifu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yuedisi Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yuedisi Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Small-Bridge Crystal Handicrafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Small-Bridge Crystal Handicrafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Green Pedel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Green Pedel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Puye Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Puye Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Youhuo Fashion Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Youhuo Fashion Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Tongda Jiean Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Tongda Jiean Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026