Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd. is a China-based food supplier located in Tianjin, with a reported factory area of over 52,000㎡ and more than 1,400 staff. Based on the provided data, the company demonstrates strong physical production capacity and is marked as a verified supplier, which supports its suitability for large-volume procurement in frozen dessert and ice cream-related product categories. The supplier is an Gold Supplier for 1 year and supports Trade Assurance, with platform labels including Full Customization, ODM service, Minor Customization, and Warranty available. However, its commercial performance data is mixed: the past six-month transaction amount is listed as CN¥405.6K+, but the order count is 0, with no shop rating and 0 reviews. This limits buyer-side validation. Overall, the supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking scalable production and customization, but initial cooperation should include sample validation, quality checks, and controlled trial orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company name: Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China, Tianjin
• Factory area: 52,000+㎡
• Employee count: 1,400+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope shown: ice cream, frozen dessert snacks, fruit-flavored ice cream products

Elaboration

The supplier reports a large factory footprint of more than 52,000㎡ and a workforce exceeding 1,400 employees. These figures indicate a substantial operating base compared with small or workshop-level suppliers. The listed product MOQs, such as 42,000 pieces, 3,000 cartons, and 3,000 boxes, also suggest that the supplier is positioned toward bulk or wholesale procurement rather than very small trial quantities.

The verified supplier status further supports the existence of a more formal supplier profile. However, the provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, annual output, cold-chain storage capacity, food safety certifications, or third-party factory audit reports beyond the “verified supplier” indication. Therefore, while the physical scale is strong, some operational details remain unconfirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier qualifies as a large-scale manufacturing entity based on the reported factory area and employee count. The combination of 52,000+㎡ and 1,400+ staff is consistent with a strong production foundation and suggests the ability to support volume-oriented purchasing. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company profile.

However, the score is not given as a perfect 20 because the data does not provide specific factory certification names, production capacity figures, audit details, or food safety management documentation. These missing elements prevent a complete assessment of operational maturity.

Final Score

19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry labels:
• Warranty available
• Full customization
• ODM service available
• Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has core platform trust indicators, including Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support. Trade Assurance is a useful mechanism for buyers because it provides a transactional protection framework through the platform. The verified supplier designation also strengthens baseline credibility.

The supplier also lists service and capability-related labels such as Full Customization, ODM service available, Minor customization, and Warranty available. These labels suggest the supplier is positioning itself for both standard wholesale and customized procurement requirements.

However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which is relatively short. In addition, the provided data does not include recognized food safety certifications, export compliance certificates, product testing reports, or detailed certification documents. Therefore, while platform credibility is present, compliance transparency is not fully demonstrated.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several important platform credibility requirements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These are positive signals for procurement risk control, especially for first-stage supplier screening.

The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier duration of 1 year. Long-term platform presence usually provides stronger confidence through accumulated transaction history and customer feedback. In this case, the supplier has the platform framework but lacks longer historical validation and detailed compliance documentation in the provided data.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Past 6-month order quantity: 0
• Past 6-month transaction amount: CN¥405.6K+
• Shop rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0

Elaboration

The business performance data is mixed. On one hand, the supplier reports a past six-month transaction amount of CN¥405.6K+, which indicates some level of transaction activity or commercial record on the platform. On the other hand, the past six-month order quantity is listed as 0, and the review count is also 0. No shop rating is provided.

This creates a limited basis for evaluating actual buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing, or market acceptance through platform feedback. The absence of rating and reviews is particularly important because business performance is not only measured by transaction value but also by order frequency, customer evaluation, and visible market validation.

Scoring Rationale

The transaction amount of CN¥405.6K+ prevents the supplier from being assessed as having no commercial activity at all. However, the reported 0 orders, 0 reviews, and missing shop rating significantly weaken the supplier’s commercial validation. From a procurement perspective, this means the supplier’s business scale cannot be confidently confirmed through completed order count or buyer feedback.

Because the available data does not show high order volume, high review volume, or rating performance, the supplier cannot be scored in the high or medium-high range for this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Full customization: Listed
• ODM service available: Listed
• Minor customization: Listed
• Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier reports a communication response time of within 4 hours, which is acceptable for international B2B communication. It is not at the fastest level, such as within 1 hour, but it still suggests a reasonable ability to respond to buyer inquiries.

The platform labels show support for Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization. This indicates the supplier may be able to handle different levels of customization, from minor adjustments to deeper product development services. However, the data does not provide details on customization lead time, design support process, R&D capability, sample development cycle, or minimum customization quantity.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates above-basic service capability because it combines acceptable response time with multiple customization-related labels. This makes it potentially suitable for buyers seeking private label, ODM, or product variation support.

The score is not placed in the 9–10 range because the response time is ≤4h rather than ≤1h, and there is no detailed evidence of customization execution capability beyond platform labels. The service capability appears solid but not fully proven at premium level.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s provided on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is an excellent delivery performance indicator. According to the scoring standard, any on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range.

For frozen dessert and ice cream products, delivery performance is especially important because product condition may depend on timing and logistics coordination. However, the provided data only confirms the on-time delivery percentage and does not include shipment volume, delivery regions, cold-chain logistics capability, or historical shipment count.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the provided on-time delivery rate, the supplier achieves the maximum score in this category. A 100.0% on-time delivery rate indicates strong delivery reliability within the available data.

The limitation is that the data does not show the number of shipments behind this percentage. Nevertheless, the scoring rule directly assigns the highest range to suppliers with over 90% on-time delivery, and this supplier clearly meets that threshold.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Shop rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Supplier is marked as verified
• Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

Quality and customer feedback are only partially supported by the provided information. The supplier is marked as verified, and the “Warranty available” label suggests some after-sales or product assurance positioning. However, there is no shop rating, no customer reviews, and no provided Finished Product Inspection information.

For food products such as ice cream and frozen desserts, quality assurance is especially important. Buyers would normally need evidence such as product inspection procedures, food safety certifications, batch control systems, cold-chain handling standards, and customer complaint records. None of these are included in the provided dataset.

The lack of reviews and shop rating means there is no visible customer-side confirmation of product consistency, service quality, or post-delivery satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives some credit because it is marked as verified and has a warranty-related platform label. These are positive but limited indicators.

However, the absence of shop rating, 0 reviews, and missing Finished Product Inspection information significantly restrict the quality assessment. Since quality performance cannot be strongly validated through customer feedback or inspection-system data, the score must remain in the lower-middle range rather than the strong quality range.

Final Score

10 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation Recommendation

Recommended for cautious preliminary cooperation, especially for buyers requiring large-scale frozen dessert or ice cream product sourcing with customization needs. The supplier shows strong company scale, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and excellent stated on-time delivery performance.

Suitable Buyer Types

This supplier is most suitable for:

• Bulk buyers seeking large-volume ice cream or frozen dessert products
• Importers or distributors requiring wholesale quantities
• Buyers interested in ODM, full customization, or minor customization
• Customers who can conduct sample testing and quality verification before mass orders

Key Risks

• Limited customer feedback: Review count is 0 and shop rating is not provided.
• Commercial validation gap: Past six-month order quantity is listed as 0 despite a transaction amount of CN¥405.6K+.
• Quality system uncertainty: Finished Product Inspection information is not provided.
• Compliance details insufficient: No specific food safety certificates or product inspection certificates are included in the provided data.
• Short platform history: Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year.

Growth Potential

The supplier has strong growth potential due to its large factory area, large workforce, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and customization labels. If the company can provide stronger quality documentation, food safety certifications, inspection records, customer reviews, and clearer transaction history, its procurement attractiveness would increase significantly.

Suggested procurement approach: Start with documentation review, sample approval, and a controlled trial order before entering long-term or high-value procurement cooperation.