zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Tianjin Dingrunda Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Tianjin Dingrunda Technology Co., Ltd.

Tianjin Dingrunda Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Tianjin Dingrunda Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Tianjin, with a reported factory area of over 22,000㎡ and more than 90 staff. The company appears to operate as a medium-scale manufacturing supplier with verified supplier status and a product portfolio focused on HDPE fish farming cages, fish netting/cage systems, and HDPE plastic pipe products. Its platform profile shows strong credibility indicators, including 10 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection, ODM service availability, warranty availability, and full customization capability. Commercial performance is supported by 50+ orders and CN¥5.5M+ transaction value over the past six months, although the review count is limited at only 3 reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking customized aquaculture cage systems or HDPE pipe-related products, especially those requiring low MOQ trial orders. Key caution areas include limited customer feedback volume and an on-time delivery rate of 89.1%, which is acceptable but slightly below the 90% high-performance benchmark.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — Final Score: 16 / 20

Basis

  • Factory location: Tianjin, China
  • Factory area: 22,000+㎡
  • Employees: 90+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively substantial reported factory area of over 22,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical production base. The workforce size of 90+ staff suggests the company is not a very small workshop-level supplier, but it also does not clearly reach the scale of a large industrial manufacturer with several hundred employees. The verified supplier status provides an additional layer of confidence regarding the existence and basic operational profile of the company.

Scoring Rationale

The factory area is a strong positive indicator and supports the assessment that the company has stable production infrastructure. However, the employee count places it closer to a medium-sized supplier rather than a large-scale supply chain enterprise. Since no additional data is provided regarding annual production capacity, production lines, equipment quantity, export volume, or factory management certifications, the score should remain within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — Final Score: 19 / 20

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 10 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full customization
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility through a 10-year Gold Supplier history, which indicates long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection for buyers. The listed platform labels also cover several important commercial and compliance-related aspects, including warranty availability, finished product inspection, ODM service, and full customization capability.

Scoring Rationale

A 10-year Gold Supplier record, combined with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status, represents a mature and credible platform profile. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and warranty-related labels further improves buyer confidence. The supplier earns a near-top score because the platform credibility indicators are comprehensive. The score is not a full 20 because the provided data does not include details of third-party factory audit reports, ISO certifications, product-specific certifications, or internationally recognized compliance documentation.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — Final Score: 16 / 20

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 50+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥5.5M+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 3

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 50 orders in the past six months, supported by a transaction value exceeding CN¥5.5M. This suggests active recent commercial activity and a meaningful transaction scale. The store rating of 4.7 is positive; however, the review base is very limited, with only 3 reviews available.

Scoring Rationale

The transaction amount is relatively strong and indicates that the supplier has handled higher-value orders within the recent six-month period. The order count is also reasonable, supporting a conclusion of stable business activity. However, the very low review count reduces the strength of commercial validation because the rating is based on limited customer feedback. Therefore, while the supplier shows good transaction performance, the limited review volume prevents classification as a fully high-verification, high-feedback supplier.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — Final Score: 9 / 10

Basis

  • Response time: ≤1 hour
  • Full customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of less than or equal to one hour indicates strong communication responsiveness. The availability of full customization and ODM service suggests that the supplier can support customized buyer requirements rather than only standard product transactions.

Scoring Rationale

Fast response time is a key advantage for international procurement, especially for technical products such as HDPE fish cages, aquaculture cage systems, and HDPE pipe products where specifications may require clarification. The presence of both full customization and ODM service supports strong service flexibility. The score is set at 9 rather than 10 because no additional data is provided on quotation turnaround time, engineering support, after-sales service process, or multilingual communication capability.

Final Score

9 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — Final Score: 8 / 10

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 89.1%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 89.1%, which falls within the 80%–89% scoring band. This indicates generally acceptable delivery reliability, although it is slightly below the 90% threshold that would qualify for the highest delivery performance category.

Scoring Rationale

An 89.1% on-time dispatch rate is close to the high-performance benchmark but still below it. For procurement planning, this means the supplier can likely support regular order fulfillment, but buyers should maintain clear delivery schedules, confirm production lead times in writing, and monitor order progress closely, especially for time-sensitive shipments.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — Final Score: 15 / 20

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 3
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The store rating of 4.7 indicates positive customer satisfaction based on the available data. The supplier also has Finished Product Inspection listed, which is a meaningful quality-control indicator. Verified supplier status further supports the credibility of the company profile. However, the number of reviews is very limited, with only 3 reviews, making the customer feedback base insufficient for a highly confident quality conclusion.

Scoring Rationale

The presence of Finished Product Inspection and a 4.7 store rating are positive indicators. However, the low number of reviews limits the reliability of the feedback score. Since there is no provided data on defect rates, inspection reports, product certifications, warranty claim history, or detailed customer complaint records, the quality assessment should be considered good but not fully validated by broad market feedback.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 9 / 10
Delivery Performance 8 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 83 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation with controlled procurement risk management.

Tianjin Dingrunda Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking HDPE fish farming cages, fish cage systems, fish netting-related products, and HDPE plastic pipe products. The supplier is especially appropriate for customers requiring customization, ODM support, low MOQ trial orders, and Trade Assurance protection.

The main strengths are its 10-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier profile, fast response time, full customization capability, and recent transaction value of CN¥5.5M+ over six months. These indicators suggest a supplier with credible platform history and active commercial operations.

Key risks include the limited review count of only 3 reviews and an on-time delivery rate of 89.1%, which is acceptable but slightly below the strongest delivery benchmark. Buyers should request detailed quotations, product specifications, inspection standards, production timelines, and shipment commitments before placing larger orders.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential and is a reasonable candidate for medium-sized or customized procurement projects, provided that buyers conduct sample verification, confirm technical requirements, and use Trade Assurance or equivalent contractual safeguards for initial transactions.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Tianjin Holladay Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Holladay Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Sunton Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Sunton Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Fussen Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Fussen Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Henghua Pipeline Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Henghua Pipeline Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Lookout Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Lookout Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhixiang Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhixiang Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Kunyu Juyixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Kunyu Juyixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Semri Bearing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Semri Bearing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Lizhong Huihe Technology And Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Lizhong Huihe Technology And Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Winture New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Winture New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Baozhong Electromechanical Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Baozhong Electromechanical Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Bluekin Industries Limited Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Bluekin Industries Limited Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Evermore International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Evermore International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Newspeed Cycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Newspeed Cycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhanzhi Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhanzhi Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zyx Bicycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zyx Bicycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Daqiaodao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tata Steel (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tata Steel (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gnee Tianjin Group Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Gnee Tianjin Group Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yld Water Processing Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yld Water Processing Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Suzhou Cleva Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Cleva Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Fuqian Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Fuqian Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Yuansheng Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Yuansheng Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Youzhiding Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Youzhiding Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gz Leangle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gz Leangle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sunrise Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sunrise Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ounan Industrial And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ounan Industrial And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Runlin Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Runlin Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ablinox (Guangdong) Precision Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ablinox (Guangdong) Precision Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhuoke Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhuoke Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Lusuo Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Lusuo Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuqiang County Huili Fiberglass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuqiang County Huili Fiberglass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Kemao Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Kemao Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Itis Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Itis Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Shaxi Bon Yip Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Shaxi Bon Yip Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kende Mechanical &Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kende Mechanical &Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Guanhua Paper Factory Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Guanhua Paper Factory Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026